点击切换搜索课件文库搜索结果(525)
文档格式:PPT 文档大小:1.53MB 文档页数:29
Language Definition of human language ----A system of vocal symbols used human communication
文档格式:PPT 文档大小:128.5KB 文档页数:23
一、语言获得 二、字词识别中的词频效应 三、句子理解时间的测量
文档格式:PPT 文档大小:100.5KB 文档页数:9
Do Children Learn By Imitation? Stages of first language learning a. one word Apple. (I would like to have an apple. This is an apple.) b. two words Daddy, apple. C. more words Doggy sit here
文档格式:PPT 文档大小:150KB 文档页数:21
The Definitions of Pragmatics speaker listener context social interaction functions of language
文档格式:PPT 文档大小:106KB 文档页数:11
ChapterⅣ Syntax Syntax and grammar Syntax: A Definition Syntax and chomsky
文档格式:PPT 文档大小:110KB 文档页数:14
Chapter IIi Sound Forms- Morphology Language and Form 1 Form of sounds 2 Form patterns
文档格式:PDF 文档大小:34.32KB 文档页数:4
Prof. Sally Haslanger December 2, 2001 Kantian Ethics (and more on famine) So far we've looked at egoist and utilitarian approaches to ethics. The main objection we considered to egoism was that it failed to accommodate the common sense idea that morality involves a kind of impartiality, at the very least it seems that
文档格式:PDF 文档大小:30.67KB 文档页数:4
December 10. 2001 (Meta-Ethical Subjectivism(or Non-cognitivism) For the past couple of weeks we have been focusing on the following questions i)Which acts are right and which are wrong? Which acts ought we to perform? ii)What makes an action right or wrong? What about the action determines its moral status? Our third question has received less attention
文档格式:PDF 文档大小:42.95KB 文档页数:5
November 29, 2001 Duty and Famine: Singer Last time we considered Mill's version of Utilitarianism, called Eudaimonistic Utilitarianism characterized by what he calls \the greatest-happiness principle\: You ought always to act so as to maximize happiness, i.e., the right act is the act that results in the greatest amount of happiness overall. The \greatest-happiness principle\, however, just states one version of Utilitarianism. Other versions of
文档格式:PDF 文档大小:26.43KB 文档页数:4
Moral Luck One of the important themes in the freewill debate is the idea that freedom is necessary for moral responsibility. In effect, if hard determinism is the correct view, then we should not hold ourselves or others morally responsible. Libertarians, in particular, seem to hold that in order to be responsible for an act, we must be its \sole author. Here is the principle at issue: Control Principle: You are only responsible for what you have control over. If you steal an axe from my garage and use it to break into a gas station, there's no point in holding me responsible, I didn't
首页上页3233343536373839下页末页
热门关键字
搜索一下,找到相关课件或文库资源 525 个  
©2008-现在 cucdc.com 高等教育资讯网 版权所有