上海交通大学：《探索物质微观世界》课程教学资源（文献资料）Advances in multiphoton microscopy technology

nature REVIEW ARTICLES photonics PUBLISHED ONLINE:31 JANUARY 2013DOI:10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361 Advances in multiphoton microscopy technology Erich E.Hoover12*and Jeff A.Squier1.2* Multiphoton microscopy has enabled unprecedented dynamic exploration in living organisms.A significant challenge in bio- logical research is the dynamic imaging of features deep within living organisms,which permits the real-time analysis of cellular structure and function.To make progress in our understanding of biological machinery,optical microscopes must be capable of rapid,targeted access deep within samples at high resolution.In this Review,we discuss the basic architecture of a multiphoton microscope capable of such analysis and summarize the state-of-the-art technologies for the quantitative imag- ing of biological phenomena. ew windows in biological exploration are being opened from the entire imaging plane simultaneously.This important dis- through the continuing development of novel optical mul- tinction allows multiphoton microscopes to perform efficient,deep tiphoton microscopy (MPM)techniques.In this imaging explorations within scattering tissues6 by including data from paradigm,near-infrared (near-IR)femtosecond lasers are used to multiply scattered signal photons,which might otherwise introduce excite optical processes that can be accessed only through the appli- a background fog?s.Whole-field detection comes at the cost of con- cation of two (or more)photons.Two-photon excitation fluores- fining imaging to within a few tens of micrometres of the surface cence(TPEF)-a process driven by the simultaneous absorption of of a scattering sample;this trade-off is an important consideration two near-infrared photons by a single fluorophore-is one example when exploring biological behaviour in scattering media. of such a technique'.The probability of triggering a multiphoton The multiphoton microscope design discussed here allows MPM process,such as TPEF,is extremely unlikely to occur.Interactions to address one of the toughest challenges since the inception of are therefore restricted to the focal plane of the objective,where the optical microscopy:achieving image contrast at the cellular level in beam intensity is maximized,which provides the optical sectioning thick,scattering specimens.By their very nature,cells are quite thin necessary for the non-perturbative analysis of living systems. (a few micrometres);such small path lengths provide little absorp- Since its inception,MPM has permitted a variety of unique tion,path length differences or scattering-all of which can pro- explorations into highly scattering materials.These studies have vide a detailed view of the intricacies of the biological machinery. examined membrane potentials on the single-molecule scale2,the The use of a femtosecond laser as the light source for the micro- non-invasive observation of embryo development3 and the simul- scope has enabled the generation of an entirely new class of con- taneous multiplane imaging of calcium transportation in transgenic trast mechanisms within such specimens.Remarkably,these lasers mice.The ability to perform such explorations is a direct result of provide intensities of the order of tens of gigawatts per square cen- the inherent optical sectioning of multiphoton microscopes's and timetre with modest focusing (for example,0.65 NA)and relatively the reduction in photobleaching outside of the imaging planes-7. low average powers(milliwatts).At such intensities,the electric field Multiphoton microscopes also benefit from the ability to utilize at the focus creates a separation of positive and negative charges, longer excitation wavelengths(700 nm and greater)than confocal thus momentarily polarizing the material.In fact,the induced time- techniques,thus making them less biologically harmfuls7 and more varying polarization is significantly overdriven,resulting in the penetrating in scattering tissue2.In addition,multiphoton micro- generation of new optical signals-distinctive from the excitation scopes can frequently take advantage of the endogenous contrast beam-that can be used to visualize structure and function in an mechanisms inherent to many samples,thus permitting the explo- unprecedented fashion.Substantive reviews of the broad array of ration of untreated specimens325. nonlinear processes now used in imaging can be found in studies by As shown in Fig.1,a typical multiphoton microscope is com- Yue et al.7 and Chung et al.is. posed of a femtosecond laser,a scanning system,a low-magnifi- Today,this nonlinear polarization can be generated with pulses as cation high-numerical-aperture (NA)microscope objective,a short as 10 fs,which represents a pulse consisting of only five or six wavelength-sensitive dichroic and a single-element detector.The optical cycles.This result is remarkable given the complexity of scanning system is an intermediate optical system that is used to the optical system that is necessary to deliver such broadband light raster the excitation beam in a two-dimensional(2D)field at the to the specimen.Combining scan optics with well-corrected high- full NA of the objective.The objective is generally used both for NA optics poses significant challenges for producing a focal spot that excitation and to collect the signal photons.These signal photons is both diffraction-limited in space and transform-limited in time. are separated from the excitation beam on the return path using Whether a pulse of 100 fs or 10 fs is used as the excitation source,it is a wavelength-sensitive dichroic.Finally,the separated signal is desirable to achieve these space-time limits in order to optimize the collected by a single-element detector such as a photomultiplier detected optical signals and get the most out of each pixel. tube(PMT). In addition to maximizing information content,deep imaging This scanning behaviour and point-by-point detection is a defin-is also of great interest to the biological community.As a result,a ing characteristic of most MPM systems,and differs significantly variety of approaches have been developed to help multiphoton from more traditional 'whole-field'microscopy platforms,which microscopes overcome depth limitations.In this Review,we discuss generally use a 2D detector such as a CCD camera to collect data a number of strategies and design constraints for imaging at depth. Center for Microintegrated Optics for Advanced Bioimaging and Control,Colorado School of Mines,1523 Illinois Street,Golden,Colorado 80401,USA. 2Department of Physics,Colorado School of Mines,1523 lllinois Street,Golden,Colorado 80401,USA.e-mail:ehoover@mines.edu,jsquier@mines.edu NATURE PHOTONICS VOL 7|FEBRUARY 2013 www.nature.com/naturephotonics 号 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.All rights reserved

© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. NATURE PHOTONICS | VOL 7 | FEBRUARY 2013 | www.nature.com/naturephotonics 93 New windows in biological exploration are being opened through the continuing development of novel optical mul￾tiphoton microscopy (MPM) techniques. In this imaging paradigm, near-infrared (near-IR) femtosecond lasers are used to excite optical processes that can be accessed only through the appli￾cation of two (or more) photons. Two-photon excitation fluores￾cence (TPEF) — a process driven by the simultaneous absorption of two near-infrared photons by a single fluorophore — is one example of such a technique1 . The probability of triggering a multiphoton process, such as TPEF, is extremely unlikely to occur. Interactions are therefore restricted to the focal plane of the objective, where the beam intensity is maximized, which provides the optical sectioning necessary for the non-perturbative analysis of living systems. Since its inception, MPM has permitted a variety of unique explorations into highly scattering materials. These studies have examined membrane potentials on the single-molecule scale2 , the non-invasive observation of embryo development3 and the simul￾taneous multiplane imaging of calcium transportation in transgenic mice4 . The ability to perform such explorations is a direct result of the inherent optical sectioning of multiphoton microscopes1,5 and the reduction in photobleaching outside of the imaging plane1,5–7. Multiphoton microscopes also benefit from the ability to utilize longer excitation wavelengths (700 nm and greater) than confocal techniques, thus making them less biologically harmful6,7 and more penetrating in scattering tissue7–11. In addition, multiphoton micro￾scopes can frequently take advantage of the endogenous contrast mechanisms inherent to many samples, thus permitting the explo￾ration of untreated specimens3,12–15. As shown in Fig. 1, a typical multiphoton microscope is com￾posed of a femtosecond laser, a scanning system, a low-magnifi￾cation high-numerical-aperture (NA) microscope objective, a wavelength-sensitive dichroic and a single-element detector. The scanning system is an intermediate optical system that is used to raster the excitation beam in a two-dimensional (2D) field at the full NA of the objective. The objective is generally used both for excitation and to collect the signal photons. These signal photons are separated from the excitation beam on the return path using a wavelength-sensitive dichroic. Finally, the separated signal is collected by a single-element detector such as a photomultiplier tube (PMT). This scanning behaviour and point-by-point detection is a defin￾ing characteristic of most MPM systems, and differs significantly from more traditional ‘whole-field’ microscopy platforms, which generally use a 2D detector such as a CCD camera to collect data Advances in multiphoton microscopy technology Erich E. Hoover1,2* and Jeff A. Squier1,2* Multiphoton microscopy has enabled unprecedented dynamic exploration in living organisms. A significant challenge in bio￾logical research is the dynamic imaging of features deep within living organisms, which permits the real-time analysis of cellular structure and function. To make progress in our understanding of biological machinery, optical microscopes must be capable of rapid, targeted access deep within samples at high resolution. In this Review, we discuss the basic architecture of a multiphoton microscope capable of such analysis and summarize the state-of-the-art technologies for the quantitative imag￾ing of biological phenomena. from the entire imaging plane simultaneously. This important dis￾tinction allows multiphoton microscopes to perform efficient, deep explorations within scattering tissues10,16 by including data from multiply scattered signal photons, which might otherwise introduce a background fog7,9. Whole-field detection comes at the cost of con￾fining imaging to within a few tens of micrometres of the surface of a scattering sample; this trade-off is an important consideration when exploring biological behaviour in scattering media. The multiphoton microscope design discussed here allows MPM to address one of the toughest challenges since the inception of optical microscopy: achieving image contrast at the cellular level in thick, scattering specimens. By their very nature, cells are quite thin (a few micrometres); such small path lengths provide little absorp￾tion, path length differences or scattering — all of which can pro￾vide a detailed view of the intricacies of the biological machinery. The use of a femtosecond laser as the light source for the micro￾scope has enabled the generation of an entirely new class of con￾trast mechanisms within such specimens. Remarkably, these lasers provide intensities of the order of tens of gigawatts per square cen￾timetre with modest focusing (for example, 0.65 NA) and relatively low average powers (milliwatts). At such intensities, the electric field at the focus creates a separation of positive and negative charges, thus momentarily polarizing the material. In fact, the induced time￾varying polarization is significantly overdriven, resulting in the generation of new optical signals — distinctive from the excitation beam — that can be used to visualize structure and function in an unprecedented fashion. Substantive reviews of the broad array of nonlinear processes now used in imaging can be found in studies by Yue et al.17 and Chung et al.18. Today, this nonlinear polarization can be generated with pulses as short as 10 fs, which represents a pulse consisting of only five or six optical cycles19–21. This result is remarkable given the complexity of the optical system that is necessary to deliver such broadband light to the specimen. Combining scan optics with well-corrected high￾NA optics poses significant challenges for producing a focal spot that is both diffraction-limited in space and transform-limited in time. Whether a pulse of 100 fs or 10 fs is used as the excitation source, it is desirable to achieve these space–time limits in order to optimize the detected optical signals and get the most out of each pixel. In addition to maximizing information content, deep imaging is also of great interest to the biological community. As a result, a variety of approaches have been developed to help multiphoton microscopes overcome depth limitations. In this Review, we discuss a number of strategies and design constraints for imaging at depth. 1 Center for Microintegrated Optics for Advanced Bioimaging and Control, Colorado School of Mines, 1523 Illinois Street, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA. 2 Department of Physics, Colorado School of Mines, 1523 Illinois Street, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA. *e-mail: ehoover@mines.edu, jsquier@mines.edu REVIEW ARTICLES PUBLISHED ONLINE: 31 JANUARY 2013 |DOI: 10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361

REVIEW ARTICLES NATURE PHOTONICS DOL:10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361 Pulsed near-IR laser Specimen Objective Figure 1|A typical multiphoton microscope fed by a near-IR laser.Typical multiphoton systems utilize near-IR(700-1,300 nm)light and use a raster scanning system to control the beam,either with 'close coupled'scan mirrors or with image-relayed scan mirrors (SM,and SM,as shown here).In this epi-detection configuration,a dichroic (D)is used to separate two-photon excited fluorescence from the excitation light and direct this fluorescence to a PMT.L=lens. Finally,we survey a number of technologies that can be used to basic light-matter interaction perspective.Additionally,there is a increase the frame rate of a multiphoton microscope,and thus its pragmatic side to extending this limit,as the extreme bandwidth of ability to measure dynamics.From this perspective,the most sig- short pulses(>100 nm)requires a highly achromatic imaging system. nificant issue is photon scarcity at high imaging rates(>30 Hz for a Designing for this constraint also benefits users who operate at longer 2D image-less than 1 us per pixel),as the number of laser pulses pulse durations(100 fs)but desire an efficient tunable microscope per pixel dwell time and the excitation efficiency of the nonlinearity over tens or even hundreds of nanometres.Furthermore,higher- of interest become critical issues that dictate image contrast. order dispersion compensation,even at these modest pulsewidths, After taking into account these disparate issues involved in gen- can have a quantifiable increase in the detected photon yield2. erating image contrast,MPM provides a set of dynamic tools for Once diffraction-limited focal conditions are achieved,a remark- addressing a variety of problems.This Review will help facilitate able number of multiphoton processes become accessible.An enor- an understanding of the strengths and limitations of many of the mous amount of information can be obtained from each image pixel common MPM techniques,thus allowing the reader to utilize MPM simultaneously,which typically encompasses a femtolitre volume of to its full potential for addressing a variety of real-world imaging the specimen.The most commonly exploited nonlinear processes tasks.The range of technology being developed in this field is truly so far include absorptive mechanisms,such as TPEF,and paramet- impressive and,as such,the scope of this Review is limited.More ric processes,such as second-harmonic generation(SHG)2,third- than ever,it is important to consult the literature when developing a harmonic generation,sum-frequency generations2,stimulated multiphoton microscope for specific applications?2. Raman scattering and coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering Used in combination,these techniques provide information about Getting the most out of each pixel a microscopic environment in terms of the chemical,structural and There is an incredible amount of information available at the focus operative mechanisms within living systems. of a multiphoton microscope;however,optimizing image content is only possible by paying careful attention to the production of a well- Multimodal imaging.Lasers capable of simultaneously and effi- focused pulse in terms of both the spatial wavefront and the tempo- ciently exciting a broad range of these nonlinearities are not pro- ral pulsefront.This attention is crucial because the production of a hibitively complex,as demonstrated by Chen et al..Their system well-focused pulse ensures the highest possible intensity at the focus, incorporates a femtosecond laser that pumps an optical parametric thereby maximizing the multiphoton signal generation.The qual- oscillator in tandem.The fundamental beam from the Ti:sapphire ity of this focus is reduced by linear dispersion from the refractive oscillator is tuned to 790 nm and used to drive the optical parametric optics in the microscope resulting from:first,an increase in the pulse oscillator,as well as provide an excitation source for TPEF and SHG duration;and,second,asymmetric distortion of the pulse in time2 imaging.The optical parametric oscillator signal(1,290 nm)and Most of these effects can effectively be pre-compensated through any idler(2,036 nm)beams perform several functions.The 1,290 nm number of means,including prism pairs,dispersion-compensating beam can be used for both SHG and third-harmonic generation mirrors and active pulse-shaping schemes.Work on improving imaging,whereas the frequency-doubled idler beam (1,018 nm)is compensation to enable the production of extremely short pulses used as the Stokes wavelength in conjunction with the main laser (10 fs and less)is particularly exciting.As stated earlier,with care- wavelength(790 nm)to provide a pump for coherent anti-Stokes ful attention to the net dispersion of the microscope,pulsewidths of Raman scattering,which is tuned to the vibrational CH,stretch less than 10 fs can be produced at the focus-Invariably,as the suitable for lipid detection. pulse duration limits are advanced,researchers also push the bound- Figure 2 is an image of a blood vessel in kidney tissue-an aries for new discoveries,from both an imaging perspective and a excellent example of a multimodal image that combines the 94 NATURE PHOTONICS VOL 7 FEBRUARY 2013 www.nature.com/naturephotonics 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.All rights reserved

© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. 94 NATURE PHOTONICS | VOL 7 | FEBRUARY 2013 | www.nature.com/naturephotonics Finally, we survey a number of technologies that can be used to increase the frame rate of a multiphoton microscope, and thus its ability to measure dynamics. From this perspective, the most sig￾nificant issue is photon scarcity at high imaging rates (>30 Hz for a 2D image — less than 1 μs per pixel), as the number of laser pulses per pixel dwell time and the excitation efficiency of the nonlinearity of interest become critical issues that dictate image contrast. After taking into account these disparate issues involved in gen￾erating image contrast, MPM provides a set of dynamic tools for addressing a variety of problems. This Review will help facilitate an understanding of the strengths and limitations of many of the common MPM techniques, thus allowing the reader to utilize MPM to its full potential for addressing a variety of real-world imaging tasks. The range of technology being developed in this field is truly impressive and, as such, the scope of this Review is limited. More than ever, it is important to consult the literature when developing a multiphoton microscope for specific applications7,22–26. Getting the most out of each pixel There is an incredible amount of information available at the focus of a multiphoton microscope; however, optimizing image content is only possible by paying careful attention to the production of a well￾focused pulse in terms of both the spatial wavefront and the tempo￾ral pulsefront. This attention is crucial because the production of a well-focused pulse ensures the highest possible intensity at the focus, thereby maximizing the multiphoton signal generation. The qual￾ity of this focus is reduced by linear dispersion from the refractive optics in the microscope resulting from: first, an increase in the pulse duration; and, second, asymmetric distortion of the pulse in time25,26. Most of these effects can effectively be pre-compensated through any number of means, including prism pairs, dispersion-compensating mirrors and active pulse-shaping schemes. Work on improving compensation to enable the production of extremely short pulses (10 fs and less) is particularly exciting. As stated earlier, with care￾ful attention to the net dispersion of the microscope, pulsewidths of less than 10 fs can be produced at the focus19–21. Invariably, as the pulse duration limits are advanced, researchers also push the bound￾aries for new discoveries, from both an imaging perspective and a basic light–matter interaction perspective. Additionally, there is a pragmatic side to extending this limit, as the extreme bandwidth of short pulses (>100 nm) requires a highly achromatic imaging system. Designing for this constraint also benefits users who operate at longer pulse durations (100 fs) but desire an efficient tunable microscope over tens or even hundreds of nanometres. Furthermore, higher￾order dispersion compensation, even at these modest pulsewidths, can have a quantifiable increase in the detected photon yield27. Once diffraction-limited focal conditions are achieved, a remark￾able number of multiphoton processes become accessible. An enor￾mous amount of information can be obtained from each image pixel simultaneously, which typically encompasses a femtolitre volume of the specimen. The most commonly exploited nonlinear processes so far include absorptive mechanisms, such as TPEF1 , and paramet￾ric processes, such as second-harmonic generation (SHG)28, third￾harmonic generation12, sum-frequency generation15,29, stimulated Raman scattering30 and coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering17,31. Used in combination, these techniques provide information about a microscopic environment in terms of the chemical, structural and operative mechanisms within living systems. Multimodal imaging. Lasers capable of simultaneously and effi￾ciently exciting a broad range of these nonlinearities are not pro￾hibitively complex, as demonstrated by Chen et al.32. Their system incorporates a femtosecond laser that pumps an optical parametric oscillator in tandem. The fundamental beam from the Ti:sapphire oscillator is tuned to 790 nm and used to drive the optical parametric oscillator, as well as provide an excitation source for TPEF and SHG imaging. The optical parametric oscillator signal (1,290  nm) and idler (2,036  nm) beams perform several functions. The 1,290  nm beam can be used for both SHG and third-harmonic generation imaging, whereas the frequency-doubled idler beam (1,018 nm) is used as the Stokes wavelength in conjunction with the main laser wavelength (790 nm) to provide a pump for coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering, which is tuned to the vibrational CH2 stretch suitable for lipid detection. Figure  2 is an image of a blood vessel in kidney tissue — an excellent example of a multimodal image that combines the L L L PMT D Objective Specimen L L SMy SMx Pulsed near-IR laser Figure 1 | A typical multiphoton microscope fed by a near-IR laser. Typical multiphoton systems utilize near-IR (700–1,300 nm) light and use a raster scanning system to control the beam, either with ‘close coupled’ scan mirrors or with image-relayed scan mirrors (SMx and SMy, as shown here). In this epi-detection configuration, a dichroic (D) is used to separate two-photon excited fluorescence from the excitation light and direct this fluorescence to a PMT. L = lens. REVIEW ARTICLES NATURE PHOTONICS DOI: 10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361

NATURE PHOTONICS DOL:10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361 REVIEW ARTICLES aforementioned contrast mechanisms.In this case,the SHG signal for many efforts to use pulse shape as a contrast mechanism is the (blue)delineates collagen,the TPEF signal (green)marks the elastin formative work of Meshulach and Silberberg3.For example,by of the vascular wall in addition to intracellular nicotinamide ade- controlling the third-order spectral phase of a broadband excitation nine dinucleotide (NADH),and the coherent anti-Stokes Raman pulse,Pillai et al.demonstrated selective TPEF imaging in living scattering signal (red)shows lipids in adipose cells.The image was Drosophila embryos.In this approach,phase-only control enables taken at 0.75 NA,with a pixel dwell time of 4 us and a field-of-view selective excitation of either endogenous fluorescence or enhanced measuring300m×300m. green fluorescence protein(eGFP)-labelled bodies,and altering the pulse shape at kilohertz rates readily enables dynamic imaging. Fluorescence lifetime.Remarkably,even considering this broad New classes of contrast mechanisms can also be exploited if one array of contrast mechanisms,there is still more information to be alters the pulse amplitude,rather than relying solely on phase control. had from each pixel of a multiphoton image.The environment can For example,by reshaping the pulse such that a high-intensity fast often be further explored,for example,by measuring fluorophore component resides on a slower low-intensity background compo- lifetimes.Additionally,lifetime measurements can provide a mecha- nent,with each component consisting of equal areas,it becomes pos- nism for discriminating between different fluorescent labels that sible to measure the amount of two-photon absorption or self-phase may have spectrally similar signatures.Fluorescent lifetime imaging modulation that is accumulated by the pulse at the focal plane- lends itself quite naturally to TPEF imaging as a result of the three- This pulse shape is created by effectively masking out the central fre- dimensional (3D)confinement of the excitation.Time-correlated quency of the pulse in the spectral domain(that is,digging a hole single-photon counting is one of the most mature technologies for at the central wavelength in the pulse spectrum).At the focus,this performing lifetime measurements,and it is extremely well-suited spectral hole is refilled through two-photon absorption processes or to today's multiphoton imaging platforms In this approach,the self-phase modulation.Fortunately,these two mechanisms can be dis- lifetime of a sample is given by a histogram built from the arrival tinguished as the field at the replenished frequency is 90 out of phase times of individual signal photons collected by a fast detector (for for two-photon absorption,with respect to self-phase modulation. example,a PMT),which makes it suitable for use even within scat- Significantly,endogenous molecular tags such as melanin or haemo- tering specimens. globin",which are nominally transparent,can be distinguished by Figure 3 is an example of using lifetime measurements to dis- using two-photon absorption as the contrast agent,whereas neuronal criminate between spectrally similar fluorophoresss.In this case, activity can be tracked using self-phase modulation. cells labelled with propidium iodide and vessels labelled with Texas Red dextran are indistinguishable when measuring the intensity Imaging deep of the TPEF signal alone.This situation is particularly evident in One task that compounds the challenge of generating image contrast Fig.3a.However,if the image is reformulated based on the fluores- in a thin specimen (such as a cell)is the task of imaging cells and cence lifetime (Fig.3b),contrast between the labels becomes evi- cellular function while embedded deep(hundreds of micrometres) dent.A final image based on fluorescent lifetime and photon counts within an organism.Switching to the longer wavelengths necessary renders a composite image(Fig.3c)that enables the unambiguous to promote efficient multiphoton excitation and detection(near- determination of the fluorophore and its targeted structure. infrared,750-1,100 nm)can increase image depths by a factor of two or three in multiphoton systems,when compared with their tra- Pulse shaping.Fluorophores can also be selectively excited or dis- ditional confocal counterparts.These wavelengths are intrinsically tinguished by altering the shape of the excitation pulse The basis more penetrating owing to their increased scattering length,with the maximum wavelength being limited by the absorption properties of the materials in the specimen.In neuronal tissue-a common MPM application-this limit is set by the blood and water in the brain and therefore limits the excitation wavelength to around 1,300 nm (ref.10).However,it is important to note that the two-photon cross- section for any fluorophore is spectrally dependent and can therefore also limit the excitation wavelength when performing TPEE High-energy lasers.Different strategies can be employed to push the maximum imaging depth,which has now exceeded 1 mm.To maintain sufficient intensity at the focus when reaching signifi- cant depths in scattering media,one of the primary tactics is to increase the energy of the excitation pulse44.For example,using ~150 fs pulses,amplified to the microjoule level (at a repetition rate of 200 kHz)and centred at a wavelength of 953 nm,Theer et al.6 used TPEF to image GFP-labelled neurons at depths of up to a mil- limetre within a sample.This strategy functions as a result of the signal dependence on unscattered (or ballistic)excitation light.As the focus is pushed deeper into the specimen,the excitation beam is depleted of these ballistic photons,primarily as a result of scattering, and the excitation efficiency is subsequently reduced.Increasing the pulse energy therefore results in more ballistic photons at depth,but this approach has its limits. In fact,it has been shown that in biological tissue the ballistic power decreases exponentially with depth as a result of scattering? Consequently,as the input power is increased to counteract this Figure2 Multimodal image of a blood vessel in kidney tissue.SHG effect,a new problem emerges.The beam intensity becomes high (blue),TPEF (green)and coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (red). enough such that tissue at the surface of the sample-outside of Image courtesy of Eric Potma,University of California,Irvine,USA. the perifocal region-can fluoresce.This out-of-focus fluorescence NATURE PHOTONICS VOL 7|FEBRUARY 2013 www.nature.com/naturephotonics 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.All rights reserved

© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. NATURE PHOTONICS | VOL 7 | FEBRUARY 2013 | www.nature.com/naturephotonics 95 aforementioned contrast mechanisms. In this case, the SHG signal (blue) delineates collagen, the TPEF signal (green) marks the elastin of the vascular wall in addition to intracellular nicotinamide ade￾nine dinucleotide (NADH), and the coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering signal (red) shows lipids in adipose cells. The image was taken at 0.75 NA, with a pixel dwell time of 4 μs and a field-of-view measuring 300 μm × 300 μm. Fluorescence lifetime. Remarkably, even considering this broad array of contrast mechanisms, there is still more information to be had from each pixel of a multiphoton image. The environment can often be further explored, for example, by measuring fluorophore lifetimes. Additionally, lifetime measurements can provide a mecha￾nism for discriminating between different fluorescent labels that may have spectrally similar signatures. Fluorescent lifetime imaging lends itself quite naturally to TPEF imaging as a result of the three￾dimensional (3D) confinement of the excitation. Time-correlated single-photon counting is one of the most mature technologies for performing lifetime measurements, and it is extremely well-suited to today’s multiphoton imaging platforms33,34. In this approach, the lifetime of a sample is given by a histogram built from the arrival times of individual signal photons collected by a fast detector (for example, a PMT), which makes it suitable for use even within scat￾tering specimens. Figure  3 is an example of using lifetime measurements to dis￾criminate between spectrally similar fluorophores35. In this case, cells labelled with propidium iodide and vessels labelled with Texas Red dextran are indistinguishable when measuring the intensity of the TPEF signal alone. This situation is particularly evident in Fig. 3a. However, if the image is reformulated based on the fluores￾cence lifetime (Fig. 3b), contrast between the labels becomes evi￾dent. A final image based on fluorescent lifetime and photon counts renders a composite image (Fig. 3c) that enables the unambiguous determination of the fluorophore and its targeted structure. Pulse shaping. Fluorophores can also be selectively excited or dis￾tinguished by altering the shape of the excitation pulse36–38.The basis for many efforts to use pulse shape as a contrast mechanism is the formative work of Meshulach and Silberberg39. For example, by controlling the third-order spectral phase of a broadband excitation pulse, Pillai et al.40 demonstrated selective TPEF imaging in living Drosophila embryos. In this approach, phase-only control enables selective excitation of either endogenous fluorescence or enhanced green fluorescence protein (eGFP)-labelled bodies, and altering the pulse shape at kilohertz rates readily enables dynamic imaging. New classes of contrast mechanisms can also be exploited if one alters the pulse amplitude, rather than relying solely on phase control. For example, by reshaping the pulse such that a high-intensity fast component resides on a slower low-intensity background compo￾nent, with each component consisting of equal areas, it becomes pos￾sible to measure the amount of two-photon absorption or self-phase modulation that is accumulated by the pulse at the focal plane41–43. This pulse shape is created by effectively masking out the central fre￾quency of the pulse in the spectral domain (that is, digging a hole at the central wavelength in the pulse spectrum). At the focus, this spectral hole is refilled through two-photon absorption processes or self-phase modulation. Fortunately, these two mechanisms can be dis￾tinguished as the field at the replenished frequency is 90° out of phase for two-photon absorption, with respect to self-phase modulation. Significantly, endogenous molecular tags such as melanin or haemo￾globin41, which are nominally transparent, can be distinguished by using two-photon absorption as the contrast agent, whereas neuronal activity can be tracked using self-phase modulation43. Imaging deep One task that compounds the challenge of generating image contrast in a thin specimen (such as a cell) is the task of imaging cells and cellular function while embedded deep (hundreds of micrometres) within an organism. Switching to the longer wavelengths necessary to promote efficient multiphoton excitation and detection (near￾infrared, 750–1,100  nm) can increase image depths by a factor of two or three in multiphoton systems, when compared with their tra￾ditional confocal counterparts. These wavelengths are intrinsically more penetrating owing to their increased scattering length, with the maximum wavelength being limited by the absorption properties of the materials in the specimen. In neuronal tissue — a common MPM application — this limit is set by the blood and water in the brain and therefore limits the excitation wavelength to around 1,300 nm (ref. 10). However, it is important to note that the two-photon cross￾section for any fluorophore is spectrally dependent and can therefore also limit the excitation wavelength when performing TPEF. High-energy lasers. Different strategies can be employed to push the maximum imaging depth, which has now exceeded 1 mm. To maintain sufficient intensity at the focus when reaching signifi￾cant depths in scattering media, one of the primary tactics is to increase the energy of the excitation pulse44–46. For example, using ~150 fs pulses, amplified to the microjoule level (at a repetition rate of 200 kHz) and centred at a wavelength of 953 nm, Theer et al.16 used TPEF to image GFP-labelled neurons at depths of up to a mil￾limetre within a sample. This strategy functions as a result of the signal dependence on unscattered (or ballistic) excitation light. As the focus is pushed deeper into the specimen, the excitation beam is depleted of these ballistic photons, primarily as a result of scattering, and the excitation efficiency is subsequently reduced. Increasing the pulse energy therefore results in more ballistic photons at depth, but this approach has its limits. In fact, it has been shown that in biological tissue the ballistic power decreases exponentially with depth as a result of scattering7 . Consequently, as the input power is increased to counteract this effect, a new problem emerges. The beam intensity becomes high enough such that tissue at the surface of the sample — outside of the perifocal region — can fluoresce. This out-of-focus fluorescence Figure 2 | Multimodal image of a blood vessel in kidney tissue. SHG (blue), TPEF (green) and coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (red). Image courtesy of Eric Potma, University of California, Irvine, USA. NATURE PHOTONICS DOI: 10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361 REVIEW ARTICLES

REVIEW ARTICLES NATURE PHOTONICS DOL:10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361 results in undesired photons obscuring the features of interest and, Total counts 6,400 Composite once again,limits the depth at which effective imaging can be per- formed.It is this undesired fluorescence that limited the amplified ,600 approach of Theer et al.,as the features in their images became clouded at depths of around 1 mm.This loss of signal compared 600 with the noise is not a result of limited pulse energy-only 225 nl 400 of the ~3 uJ available (roughly 29%of the available laser power) 0 was used-but rather results from the out-of-focus fluorescence at the surface of the specimen.Hence,alternative strategies are now b Lifetime,r actively being pursued. 6 Long-wavelength excitation.One of the most effective tactics 4 for imaging at depth exploits a key feature that made nonlinear imaging compelling in the first place:the use of longer excitation 0 wavelengths.By moving away from 800 nm towards 1,280 nm, Kobat et al.1047 have been able to perform in vivo TPEF imaging in a mouse cortex at depths as great as 1.6 mm(Fig.4).This improve- Figure3 lllustrative fluorescence lifetime image with two similar ment in depth is a result of decreased scattering at the 1,280 nm fluorophores and comparison to TPEF imaging.Fluorescence intensity wavelength generated from their Ti:sapphire pumped optical para- and lifetime imaging of propidium iodide(Pl)-labelled cells and Texas Red metric oscillator.This choice of laser is significant,as it provides a dextran (TR)-labelled vessels in a mouse model.a,TPEF image shows that high-repetition-rate (80 MHz)pulse train with modest pulse ener- the two dyes are indistinguishable.Scale bar (right)represents photon gies(~1.5 n),which facilitates rapid imaging.Although the use ofa counts.b,Image is rescaled according to the measured fluorescent lifetime; longer wavelength compromises the resolution slightly,the benefits the Pl-label and the TR-label are now spatially distinct.Scale bar (right)is of improved depth penetration and facile multimodal detection34 in nanoseconds.c,The images in a and b are combined,thus enabling facile makes the concession worthwhile for many applications. detection of the two fluorophores.The arrowhead points to a Pl-labelled cell,whereas the arrow points to a TR-labelled vessel.Figure reproduced Imaging through gradient-index lenses.The dual complications with permission from ref.35,2011 APS. of reduced power as a function of depth and increased out-of-focus background fluorescence can be completely obviated through the Photon counting.As the imaging depth is increased,another addi- use of gradient-index(GRIN)lenses.This technique was demon- tional complication is the scattering of the signal photons.If the sig- strated by Levene et al.s,who used needle-like(320 um diameter) nal light is collected in a non-imaging modality using single-element GRIN lenses that can penetrate directly into the specimen and per- detection,such as with a PMT,multiple scattering events en route form in vivo multiphoton imaging at depths of several millimetres. to the detector are not necessarily detrimental.Essentially,collect- Appropriately engineered GRIN lenses effectively relay the focal ing scattered light at angles or in regions beyond the cone of light plane of the microscope over tens of millimetres(even centimetre) defined by the excitation beam enforces the requirement of main- distances,as the lens is pressed into the tissue up to the layer of taining high-NA collection over a large field-of-view;hence the interest.Using 0.6-NA GRIN lenses,Levene et al.achieved a circu- drive towards high-NA,low-magnification objectivess.Having col- lar field-of-view measuring 58 um in diameter and axially scanned lected the light,it is often the case when working in this regime that over a distance of 95 um without needing to shift the GRIN lens. there is essentially less than one signal photon generated per excita- A natural extension of GRIN technology is to consider complete tion pulse.In such a situation,it becomes beneficial to incorporate endoscopic multiphoton imaging platforms.Indeed,this is a vibrant photon counting detection in order to discriminate signal photons area of developments-s and features millimetre-diameter probes from background noise.Until recently,this was considered prohibi- that are suitable for clinical applicationss tive given the repetition rates of the lasers,which are in the range of 70-100 MHz.However,with the advent of inexpensive,high-perfor- Photo-activatable fluorophores.Other approaches for imag- mance microelectronics such as field-programmable gate arrays0-3 ing at depth that are less invasive than GRIN technology include the implementation of photon-counting circuitry is not only quite the incorporation of photo-activatable fluorophoresss,as recently feasible,but also very economical.Driscoll et al.s have shown that demonstrated by Chen et al..In their technique,the fluorophores through proper implementation of photon counting,and by account- remain in a dark state(that is,a non-fluorescent state)until opti- ing for the censor period of the detector,the signal-to-noise ratio can cally triggered by multiphoton excitation.In this case,the ratio of be measurably improved.This improvement is sufficient to extend the signal-to-background fluorescence is improved by using one photon counting for operation in the high-emission-rate regime, multiphoton source,centred at 830 nm,to activate the fluoro- where analogue integration is generally thought to be requiredss phores,and a second source,centred at 920 nm,to produce TPEF signal from the activated sites.This multiphoton activation strategy Adaptive optics.A final notable consideration for improving mul- allows a larger number of fluorophores to be activated within the tiphoton imaging at depth is the incorporation of adaptive optical focal plane compared with the out-of-focus regions,thus resulting schemes.The breadth ofinnovation in terms of adaptive optical cor- in a measurable increase in the signal-to-background ratio.Indeed, rection is worthy of a review in and of itself,and is therefore only starting with control samples that are engineered to mimic the fun- briefly considered here.One of the most intriguing pathways for damental depth limits(where the signal-to-background ratio equals the implementation of adaptive optics,with respect to deep imag- unity),Chen et al.s6 have demonstrated signal-to-background ratios ing,is to incorporate a system that is capable of rapidly adjusting the of around 20 by using the photo-activation approach.In general, wavefront to accommodate aberrations induced by both the opti- customizing probess for deep imaging,as briefly discussed here,is cal delivery system and the specimen without a direct assessment a field in and of itself (see Extermann et al.for an example of a of the aberrated wavefront7.Rather than assessing the wavefront deep SHG probe-a completely different approach from the one directly,the image is corrected based on metrics derived from the discussed here)and further elaboration is outside the scope of image itself.This 'sensorless'approach has recently been analysed in this Review. detail by Facomprezet al.",who established a useful series of guiding 96 NATURE PHOTONICS VOL 7 FEBRUARY 2013 www.nature.com/naturephotonics 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.All rights reserved

© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. 96 NATURE PHOTONICS | VOL 7 | FEBRUARY 2013 | www.nature.com/naturephotonics results in undesired photons obscuring the features of interest and, once again, limits the depth at which effective imaging can be per￾formed9 . It is this undesired fluorescence that limited the amplified approach of Theer et al.16, as the features in their images became clouded at depths of around 1  mm. This loss of signal compared with the noise is not a result of limited pulse energy — only 225 nJ of the ~3  μJ available (roughly 29% of the available laser power) was used — but rather results from the out-of-focus fluorescence at the surface of the specimen. Hence, alternative strategies are now actively being pursued. Long-wavelength excitation. One of the most effective tactics for imaging at depth exploits a key feature that made nonlinear imaging compelling in the first place: the use of longer excitation wavelengths. By moving away from 800  nm towards 1,280  nm, Kobat et al.10,47 have been able to perform in vivo TPEF imaging in a mouse cortex at depths as great as 1.6 mm (Fig. 4). This improve￾ment in depth is a result of decreased scattering at the 1,280  nm wavelength generated from their Ti:sapphire pumped optical para￾metric oscillator. This choice of laser is significant, as it provides a high-repetition-rate (80 MHz) pulse train with modest pulse ener￾gies (~1.5 nJ), which facilitates rapid imaging. Although the use of a longer wavelength compromises the resolution slightly, the benefits of improved depth penetration48 and facile multimodal detection3,49 makes the concession worthwhile for many applications. Imaging through gradient-index lenses. The dual complications of reduced power as a function of depth and increased out-of-focus background fluorescence can be completely obviated through the use of gradient-index (GRIN) lenses. This technique was demon￾strated by Levene et al.50, who used needle-like (320 μm diameter) GRIN lenses that can penetrate directly into the specimen and per￾form in vivo multiphoton imaging at depths of several millimetres. Appropriately engineered GRIN lenses effectively relay the focal plane of the microscope over tens of millimetres (even centimetre) distances, as the lens is pressed into the tissue up to the layer of interest. Using 0.6-NA GRIN lenses, Levene et al. achieved a circu￾lar field-of-view measuring 58 μm in diameter and axially scanned over a distance of 95 μm without needing to shift the GRIN lens. A natural extension of GRIN technology is to consider complete endoscopic multiphoton imaging platforms. Indeed, this is a vibrant area of development51–54 and features millimetre-diameter probes that are suitable for clinical applications54. Photo-activatable fluorophores. Other approaches for imag￾ing at depth that are less invasive than GRIN technology include the incorporation of photo-activatable fluorophores55, as recently demonstrated by Chen et al.56. In their technique, the fluorophores remain in a dark state (that is, a non-fluorescent state) until opti￾cally triggered by multiphoton excitation. In this case, the ratio of the signal-to-background fluorescence is improved by using one multiphoton source, centred at 830  nm, to activate the fluoro￾phores, and a second source, centred at 920 nm, to produce TPEF signal from the activated sites. This multiphoton activation strategy allows a larger number of fluorophores to be activated within the focal plane compared with the out-of-focus regions, thus resulting in a measurable increase in the signal-to-background ratio. Indeed, starting with control samples that are engineered to mimic the fun￾damental depth limits (where the signal-to-background ratio equals unity), Chen et al.56 have demonstrated signal-to-background ratios of around 20 by using the photo-activation approach. In general, customizing probes57 for deep imaging, as briefly discussed here, is a field in and of itself (see Extermann et al.58 for an example of a deep SHG probe — a completely different approach from the one discussed here) and further elaboration is outside the scope of this Review. Photon counting. As the imaging depth is increased, another addi￾tional complication is the scattering of the signal photons. If the sig￾nal light is collected in a non-imaging modality using single-element detection, such as with a PMT, multiple scattering events en route to the detector are not necessarily detrimental. Essentially, collect￾ing scattered light at angles or in regions beyond the cone of light defined by the excitation beam enforces the requirement of main￾taining high-NA collection over a large field-of-view; hence the drive towards high-NA, low-magnification objectives59. Having col￾lected the light, it is often the case when working in this regime that there is essentially less than one signal photon generated per excita￾tion pulse. In such a situation, it becomes beneficial to incorporate photon counting detection in order to discriminate signal photons from background noise. Until recently, this was considered prohibi￾tive given the repetition rates of the lasers, which are in the range of 70–100 MHz. However, with the advent of inexpensive, high-perfor￾mance microelectronics such as field-programmable gate arrays60–63, the implementation of photon-counting circuitry is not only quite feasible, but also very economical. Driscoll et al.35 have shown that through proper implementation of photon counting, and by account￾ing for the censor period of the detector, the signal-to-noise ratio can be measurably improved. This improvement is sufficient to extend photon counting for operation in the high-emission-rate regime, where analogue integration is generally thought to be required35. Adaptive optics. A final notable consideration for improving mul￾tiphoton imaging at depth is the incorporation of adaptive optical schemes. The breadth of innovation in terms of adaptive optical cor￾rection is worthy of a review in and of itself, and is therefore only briefly considered here. One of the most intriguing pathways for the implementation of adaptive optics, with respect to deep imag￾ing, is to incorporate a system that is capable of rapidly adjusting the wavefront to accommodate aberrations induced by both the opti￾cal delivery system and the specimen without a direct assessment of the aberrated wavefront64–70. Rather than assessing the wavefront directly, the image is corrected based on metrics derived from the image itself. This ‘sensorless’ approach has recently been analysed in detail by Facomprez et al.71, who established a useful series of guiding 6,400 3,600 1,600 400 0 a Total counts c b Composite Lifetime, τ 0 ns 2 4 6 8 10 10 µm 10 µm 10 µm Figure 3 | Illustrative fluorescence lifetime image with two similar fluorophores and comparison to TPEF imaging. Fluorescence intensity and lifetime imaging of propidium iodide (PI)-labelled cells and Texas Red dextran (TR)-labelled vessels in a mouse model. a, TPEF image shows that the two dyes are indistinguishable. Scale bar (right) represents photon counts. b, Image is rescaled according to the measured fluorescent lifetime; the PI-label and the TR-label are now spatially distinct. Scale bar (right) is in nanoseconds. c, The images in a and b are combined, thus enabling facile detection of the two fluorophores. The arrowhead points to a PI-labelled cell, whereas the arrow points to a TR-labelled vessel. Figure reproduced with permission from ref. 35, © 2011 APS. REVIEW ARTICLES NATURE PHOTONICS DOI: 10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361

NATURE PHOTONICS DOL:10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361 REVIEW ARTICLES 400 Surface 1,150 元 200 10 450 8 400 Slope=-0.007 1,200 600 1,500 & 4 800 1,250 2 1,000 1550 0- 02004006008001,0001.2001,4001,600 1,300 1.200 Depth (um) Depth 1.090 um 1,600 Depth 1,300 um Depth 1,460 um Depth 1,600 um 1,400 1,350 1,600 um μm 1,650 um Figure 4 Example of deep invivo imaging through the use of longer excitation wavelengths.1,280 nm light from an optical parametric oscillator is used to perform TPEF imaging of mouse vasculature labelled with Alexa680-Dextran.a,Invivo two-photon fluorescence images of cortical vasculature in mouse brain.235 x-y frames from 60 um above the cortical surface to 1,110 um below are taken at depth increments of 5 um.The depth increments in the stack are 20 um in the range of 1,110-1,490 um and 30 um in the range of 1,490-1,670 um.3D reconstruction is made in Image J software using the volume viewer plug-in.Expanded 3D stacks are shown for the deepest sections (>1,130 um).b,Fluorescence intensity as a function of imaging depth for the stack shown in a.Fluorescence signal strength at a particular depth is represented by the average value of the brightest 1%of the pixels in the x-y image at that depth.Scale bars are 50 um for both a and b.Figure reproduced with permission from ref.47,2011 SPIE. principles that can be employed to optimize adaptive optical strate- foci within the sample.The emitted signal photons generated by this gies.Interestingly,they demonstrated that adaptive systems incorpo- matrix must be imaged to their conjugate positions on the detector, rating this philosophy are compatible with biological systems,both as opposed to collecting all of the photons in single-element detec- in terms of the speed at which corrections can be implemented and tion.If the signal photons are scattered,they will not be correctly the light levels that must be used to achieve accurate correction. mapped to the conjugate image position by the optical system,thus resulting in a background haze in the images.This limitation can be High-speed imaging mitigated somewhat by introducing a segmented detector and uti- Owing to the raster-scanning nature of most imaging systems in lizing descanned detection,in which emitted photons are detected MPM and the limited number of emitted signal photons available after the scan system.Kim et al have successfully established this for constructing an image,accessing dynamic behaviour in a 3D strategy.In their configuration,a multi-anode PMT is used to match volume has proven to be an interesting challenge.Several different the coordinates of the foci within the sample such that each anode strategies for approaching rapid imaging are described here,but this receives the vast majority of photons emitted from a particular is by no means a comprehensive list.Each of these techniques comes focus".This mode of operation permits the multifocal microscope with its own particular strengths and weaknesses,which should be to operate in a similar fashion to that of a single-focal-spot,single- carefully weighed in order to adopt an optimal imaging approach. element detection system.Kim et al.have successfully demonstrated that using 64 foci can extend the effective imaging depth from less Multifocal microscopy.One of the most widely used strategies for than 30 um to around 75 um in neuronal tissue?9 improving the frame rate in MPM is the use of multiple foci to paral- lelize the imaging process.Simply put,by distributing the excitation High-speed scan systems.Another important strategy in high- light over multiple foci,the time required to scan the focal plane is speed imaging is simply to raster the beam as fast as possible.As reduced accordingly.For example,when scanning linearly,two foci such,polygonal mirrors and resonant scanners hold an important cover a fixed field-of-view in half the time,and subsequent gains in place in high-speed MPM,as these systems provide a way to image the frame-rate scale proportionately to the number of foci?.However, 2D areas at video rates-30 Hz (refs 80,81)-without losing the as the density of foci increases,the axial resolution decreases as a ability to explore deep within scattering tissue.In such systems, result of constructive interference between the foci.Fortunately,this practical image speeds are essentially dictated by the number of exci- problem can be overcome by delaying each focal spot temporally tation pulses per pixel dwell time.With lasers operating at repetition with respect to its neighbours by an amount of the order of the pulse rates of 75-100 MHz,pixel dwell times of the order of 150 ns are duration (or slightly greater).In this way,the interference is entirely needed to ensure~10 pulses per pixel.A second design consideration eliminated and the axial resolution from a 2D array of focal spots when optimizing the frame rate for systems scanned in this manner is equivalent to that of its single-focal-spot counterpart2-%6.Truly involves the scan's 'dead time.For polygonal mirrors this problem remarkable frame rates have been achieved through this approach. occurs when the laser beam hits the interface between mirror facets Bahlmann et al.7 have successfully exceeded frame rates of 600 Hz. and,for resonant scan mirrors,the nonlinear scan region where the In a multifocal microscope,a single-element detector can no mirrors are accelerating and decelerating. longer be used to collect the excited photons from the sample,so it becomes necessary to use a camera?8.The necessity for a 2D detector Acousto-optics and tunable lenses.Although polygonal mirrors stems from the implementation of a 2D spatial matrix of excitation and resonant scanners can permit rapid imaging,theylack flexibility NATURE PHOTONICS VOL 7 FEBRUARY 2013 www.nature.com/naturephotonics 97 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.All rights reserved

© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. NATURE PHOTONICS | VOL 7 | FEBRUARY 2013 | www.nature.com/naturephotonics 97 principles that can be employed to optimize adaptive optical strate￾gies. Interestingly, they demonstrated that adaptive systems incorpo￾rating this philosophy are compatible with biological systems, both in terms of the speed at which corrections can be implemented and the light levels that must be used to achieve accurate correction. High-speed imaging Owing to the raster-scanning nature of most imaging systems in MPM and the limited number of emitted signal photons available for constructing an image, accessing dynamic behaviour in a 3D volume has proven to be an interesting challenge. Several different strategies for approaching rapid imaging are described here, but this is by no means a comprehensive list. Each of these techniques comes with its own particular strengths and weaknesses, which should be carefully weighed in order to adopt an optimal imaging approach. Multifocal microscopy. One of the most widely used strategies for improving the frame rate in MPM is the use of multiple foci to paral￾lelize the imaging process. Simply put, by distributing the excitation light over multiple foci, the time required to scan the focal plane is reduced accordingly. For example, when scanning linearly, two foci cover a fixed field-of-view in half the time, and subsequent gains in the frame-rate scale proportionately to the number of foci72. However, as the density of foci increases, the axial resolution decreases as a result of constructive interference between the foci. Fortunately, this problem can be overcome by delaying each focal spot temporally with respect to its neighbours by an amount of the order of the pulse duration (or slightly greater). In this way, the interference is entirely eliminated and the axial resolution from a 2D array of focal spots is equivalent to that of its single-focal-spot counterpart72–76. Truly remarkable frame rates have been achieved through this approach. Bahlmann et al.77 have successfully exceeded frame rates of 600 Hz. In a multifocal microscope, a single-element detector can no longer be used to collect the excited photons from the sample, so it becomes necessary to use a camera78. The necessity for a 2D detector stems from the implementation of a 2D spatial matrix of excitation foci within the sample. The emitted signal photons generated by this matrix must be imaged to their conjugate positions on the detector, as opposed to collecting all of the photons in single-element detec￾tion. If the signal photons are scattered, they will not be correctly mapped to the conjugate image position by the optical system, thus resulting in a background haze in the images. This limitation can be mitigated somewhat by introducing a segmented detector and uti￾lizing descanned detection, in which emitted photons are detected after the scan system. Kim et al.79 have successfully established this strategy. In their configuration, a multi-anode PMT is used to match the coordinates of the foci within the sample such that each anode receives the vast majority of photons emitted from a particular focus79. This mode of operation permits the multifocal microscope to operate in a similar fashion to that of a single-focal-spot, single￾element detection system. Kim et al. have successfully demonstrated that using 64 foci can extend the effective imaging depth from less than 30 μm to around 75 μm in neuronal tissue79. High-speed scan systems. Another important strategy in high￾speed imaging is simply to raster the beam as fast as possible. As such, polygonal mirrors and resonant scanners hold an important place in high-speed MPM, as these systems provide a way to image 2D areas at video rates — 30 Hz (refs 80,81) — without losing the ability to explore deep within scattering tissue82. In such systems, practical image speeds are essentially dictated by the number of exci￾tation pulses per pixel dwell time. With lasers operating at repetition rates of 75–100  MHz, pixel dwell times of the order of 150  ns are needed to ensure ~10 pulses per pixel. A second design consideration when optimizing the frame rate for systems scanned in this manner involves the scan’s ‘dead time’. For polygonal mirrors this problem occurs when the laser beam hits the interface between mirror facets and, for resonant scan mirrors, the nonlinear scan region where the mirrors are accelerating and decelerating. Acousto-optics and tunable lenses. Although polygonal mirrors and resonant scanners can permit rapid imaging, they lack flexibility a b Depth 1,090 µm Depth 1,300 µm Depth 1,460 µm Depth 1,600 µm In (2P Fluorescence signal) Depth (µm) 0 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 1,150 Slope = –0.007 1,400 1,450 1,500 1,550 1,600 1,650 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 Surface 1,200 1,250 1,300 1,350 µm µm µm Figure 4 | Example of deep in vivo imaging through the use of longer excitation wavelengths. 1,280 nm light from an optical parametric oscillator is used to perform TPEF imaging of mouse vasculature labelled with Alexa680-Dextran. a, In vivo two-photon fluorescence images of cortical vasculature in mouse brain. 235 x–y frames from 60 μm above the cortical surface to 1,110 μm below are taken at depth increments of 5 μm. The depth increments in the stack are 20 μm in the range of 1,110–1,490 μm and 30 μm in the range of 1,490–1,670 μm. 3D reconstruction is made in Image J software using the volume viewer plug-in. Expanded 3D stacks are shown for the deepest sections (>1,130 μm). b, Fluorescence intensity as a function of imaging depth for the stack shown in a. Fluorescence signal strength at a particular depth is represented by the average value of the brightest 1% of the pixels in the x–y image at that depth. Scale bars are 50 μm for both a and b. Figure reproduced with permission from ref. 47, © 2011 SPIE. NATURE PHOTONICS DOI: 10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361 REVIEW ARTICLES

REVIEW ARTICLES NATURE PHOTONICS DOI:10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361 250 10.000 250 10.000 200 -8,000 200 8000 150 6.000 150 6.000 Glomeruli 100 4.000 100- 4.000 50 ·2.000 50 2.000 0μm 7 um 0- 0 0- 0 100150 200 250 0 50 100 150 200 250 250 10.000 250 10.000 200- 8.000 200 8.000 150- 6,000 150 6.000 100 4.000 100 4.000 50- 2.000 50- 2.000 21μm 14 um 0- 0 0 0 50 100 150200 250 50 100 150 200250 Figure5 Simultaneous multilayer imaging achieved with remote focusing.Four images of Drosophila melanogaster antennal lobe structure labelled with red fluorescent protein.The images are separated axially by 7 um in depth and were all acquired simultaneously from a single-element detector.Figure reproduced with permission from ref.105,2012 Wiley. in terms of their ability to target special features of interest within issue Spatiotemporal focusing involves directing the laser pulse the field-of-view.Acousto-optic deflectors and tunable lenses have through a spectrally dispersive element,such as a prism or a diffrac- been introduced to permit this freedom of imaging region selec-tion grating,such that the beam is angularly dispersed as a function tion,as the inertia of moving scan mirrors or the objective is no of wavelength.This configuration produces a situation in which the longer an issues-.This capability allows researchers to image different frequencies that comprise the laser pulse are no longer only the most important objects within a volumes6.Such systems overlapping spatially and,as a result,cannot add together to pro- can dramatically reduce the time spent imaging(allowing acquisi- duce a short transform-limited pulse in time.Through the applica- tion rates of up to 10 kHz(ref.87))and reduce photodamage in tion of an appropriately designed image-relay system,these spatially living specimenss,as features that are of no interest to the research separate frequencies can be made to overlap,but only at the focus at hand are not processed with the beam.This technique has even of the microscope objective.Consequently,the laser pulse is trans- been expanded to handle random-access imaging in three dimen- form limited only at the focal plane.The out-of-focus light pulse not sions,thus permitting researchers to select multiple locations for only exhibits an extended spatial footprint (lowering the intensity), imaging even when these locations are not within the same lateral but is also 'stretched'in time(which also lowers the intensity).The plane.These systems are the result of exquisite engineering efforts combination of pulse focusing and defocusing,both from a spatial that not only enable unprecedented access,but also compensate for and a temporal point of view,causes a localization in peak intensity, the pulse dispersion and wavelength dependence introduced by the such that extended source geometries can achieve an axial resolu- acousto-optic deflector2 and/or the aberrations and loss of effec- tion equivalent to that of their diffraction-limited single-point coun- tive NA introduced through the tunable lenss. terparts"-99.However,because this is a whole-field technique and therefore requires an imaging detector,it may not be well-suited to Spatiotemporal focusing.An alternative strategy for improving imaging at depths of more than 250 um within scattering media9 imaging speeds and potentially simplifying MPM designs is to use Even so,the ability of this technique to perform whole-field detection an extended geometry such as a line cursor(as opposed to a point with tight axial sectioning is an enabling technology for many areas of focus).The first video-rate multiphoton microscope was based on research.Andrasfalvy et al.have demonstrated this in their optoge- such an approach The challenge with this method is that resolu- netics work,in which spatiotemporal focusing permits selective con- tion is compromised along the low-NA dimension of the excitation trol of neuronal activity at the single-cell level through two-photon source,although spatiotemporal focusing can be used to address this activation of Channelrhodopsin-2. 98 NATURE PHOTONICS VOL 7|FEBRUARY 2013 www.nature.com/naturephotonics 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.All rights reserved

© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. 98 NATURE PHOTONICS | VOL 7 | FEBRUARY 2013 | www.nature.com/naturephotonics in terms of their ability to target special features of interest within the field-of-view. Acousto-optic deflectors and tunable lenses have been introduced to permit this freedom of imaging region selec￾tion, as the inertia of moving scan mirrors or the objective is no longer an issue83–85. This capability allows researchers to image only the most important objects within a volume86. Such systems can dramatically reduce the time spent imaging (allowing acquisi￾tion rates of up to 10  kHz (ref.  87)) and reduce photodamage in living specimens88, as features that are of no interest to the research at hand are not processed with the beam. This technique has even been expanded to handle random-access imaging in three dimen￾sions87,89, thus permitting researchers to select multiple locations for imaging even when these locations are not within the same lateral plane. These systems are the result of exquisite engineering efforts that not only enable unprecedented access, but also compensate for the pulse dispersion and wavelength dependence introduced by the acousto-optic deflector82,90 and/or the aberrations and loss of effec￾tive NA introduced through the tunable lens83,91. Spatiotemporal focusing. An alternative strategy for improving imaging speeds and potentially simplifying MPM designs is to use an extended geometry such as a line cursor (as opposed to a point focus). The first video-rate multiphoton microscope was based on such an approach92. The challenge with this method is that resolu￾tion is compromised along the low-NA dimension of the excitation source, although spatiotemporal focusing can be used to address this issue93,94. Spatiotemporal focusing involves directing the laser pulse through a spectrally dispersive element, such as a prism or a diffrac￾tion grating, such that the beam is angularly dispersed as a function of wavelength. This configuration produces a situation in which the different frequencies that comprise the laser pulse are no longer overlapping spatially and, as a result, cannot add together to pro￾duce a short transform-limited pulse in time. Through the applica￾tion of an appropriately designed image-relay system, these spatially separate frequencies can be made to overlap, but only at the focus of the microscope objective. Consequently, the laser pulse is trans￾form limited only at the focal plane. The out-of-focus light pulse not only exhibits an extended spatial footprint (lowering the intensity), but is also ‘stretched’ in time (which also lowers the intensity). The combination of pulse focusing and defocusing, both from a spatial and a temporal point of view, causes a localization in peak intensity, such that extended source geometries can achieve an axial resolu￾tion equivalent to that of their diffraction-limited single-point coun￾terparts93–98. However, because this is a whole-field technique and therefore requires an imaging detector, it may not be well-suited to imaging at depths of more than 250 μm within scattering media99. Even so, the ability of this technique to perform whole-field detection with tight axial sectioning is an enabling technology for many areas of research. Andrasfalvy et al.100 have demonstrated this in their optoge￾netics work, in which spatiotemporal focusing permits selective con￾trol of neuronal activity at the single-cell level through two-photon activation of Channelrhodopsin-2. 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 0 µm 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 7 µm 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 21 µm 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 14 µm Cell body Glomeruli Figure 5 | Simultaneous multilayer imaging achieved with remote focusing. Four images of Drosophila melanogaster antennal lobe structure labelled with red fluorescent protein. The images are separated axially by 7 μm in depth and were all acquired simultaneously from a single-element detector. Figure reproduced with permission from ref. 105, © 2012 Wiley. REVIEW ARTICLES NATURE PHOTONICS DOI: 10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361

NATURE PHOTONICS DOL:10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361 REVIEW ARTICLES Remote focusing.Finally,most high-speed imaging has focused on 6. Chen,I.H.,Chu,S.W.Sun,C.K.,Cheng,P.C.Lin,B.L.Wavelength techniques for the rapid raster scanning of lateral images.Recent dependent damage in biological multi-photon confocal microscopy:A developments have led to the remote focusing'technique,which micro-spectroscopic comparison between femtosecond Ti:sapphire and allows rapid axial scanning of the beam0.This technique,when Cr:forsterite laser sources.Opt.Quant.Electron.34,1251-1266(2002). combined with a scan mirror system,permits novel access to bio- 1- Helmchen,F.Denk,W.Deep tissue two-photon microscopy.Nat.Methods 2,932-940(2005). logical systems,such as the ability to image an x-z plane or perform 8. Yaroslavsky,A.N.et al.Optical properties of selected native and coagulated high-speed 3D imagingRemote focusing operates by modify- human brain tissues in vitro in the visible and near infrared spectral range. ing the divergence of the beam at the back of the excitation objec- Phys.Med.Biol.47,2059-2073(2002). tive,usually by imaging the objective's stop to an upstream location, 9. Theer,P.Denk,W.On the fundamental imaging-depth limit in two where a second 'remote'objective is used in conjunction with a mir- photon microscopy.J.Opt.Soc.Am.A 23,3139-3149 (2006) 0 Kobat,D.et al.Deep tissue multiphoton microscopy using longer wavelength ror at its focus.It is this second,remotely located objective-mirror excitation.Opt.Express 17,13354-13364 (2009). combination that produces the necessary divergence at the excitation 11. Ntziachristos,V.Going deeper than microscopy:The optical imaging frontier objective when the distance between the remote objective and mirror in biology.Nat.Methods 7,603-614(2010). is adjusted.This configuration is similar to how a properly imaged 12. Barad,Y.,Eisenberg.H.,Horowitz,M.Silberberg.Y.Nonlinear scanning scan-relay system is designed,although such a system operates on the laser microscopy by third harmonic generation.Appl.Phys.Lett.70, 922-924(1997) angle at the back of the objective rather than the divergence.The abil- ity to control the axial focus of the microscope by employing remote Masihzadeh,O.,Schlup,P.&Bartels,R.A.Label-free second harmonic generation holographic microscopy of biological specimens.Opt.Express 18 focusing represents a dramatic step forwards for biological imaging, 9840-9851(2010). as this allows biologists to examine specimens in three dimensions 14. Zhuo,S.et al.Label-free monitoring of colonic cancer progression using without moving either the object under examination or the objec- multiphoton microscopy.Biomed.Opt.Express 2,615-619(2011). tive used for imaging(Fig.5)05.This change in imaging paradigm is 15. Segawa,H.et al.Label-free tetra-modal molecular imaging of living cells significant because moving the specimen requires expensive stages with CARS,SHG.THG and TSFG(coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering, second harmonic generation,third harmonic generation and third-order and can introduce significant problems for 'registering real-world sum frequency generation).Opt.Express 20,9551-9557(2012) coordinates in individual frames with any previously captured data. Theer,P.,Hasan,M.T.Denk,W.Two-photon imaging to a depth of 1000 Although moving the objective might be considered as an alternative um in living brains by use of a Ti:Al,O,regenerative amplifier.Opt.Lett.28 to translating the specimen,such an endeavour degrades the image 1022-1024(2003). quality by moving away from the ideal objective position and can 17. Yue,S.,Slipchenko,M.Cheng.J.X.Multimodal nonlinear optical microscopy.Las.Photon.Rev.5,496-512 (2011). introduce vibrations that negatively impact the image quality. Chung.C.Y.,Boik,J.Potma,E.O.Biomolecular imaging with coherent nonlinear vibrational microscopy.Ann.Rev.Phys.Chem.64,77-99 (2013) Conclusion 19. Larson,A.Yeh,A.Ex vivo characterization of sub-10-fs pulses.Opt.Lett. The landscape of MPM has grown enormously since the initial appli- 31.1681-1683(2006). cation of TPEF microscopy by Denk et al,and as such,no single 20. Pestov,D.,Xu,B.,Li,H.Dantus,M.Delivery and characterization of sub- article can truly do justice to the broad range of new technologies and 8fs laser pulses at the imaging plane of a two-photon microscope.Proc.SPIE 7903,79033B(2011). novel explorations that have resulted.There are significant topics not addressed here,including pushing the resolution limitsspec- 21. Selm,R.,Krauss,G.,Leitenstorfer,A.Zumbusch,A.Simultaneous second- harmonic generation,third-harmonic generation,and four-wave mixing trally resolved imaging and multiphoton light sheet microscopy. microscopy with single sub-8 fs laser pulses.Appl.Phys.Lett.99, The future for MPM looks bright from many perspectives.New 181124(2011). femtosecond laser sources that operate reliably with exceptional ease Zipfel,W.,Williams,R.Webb,W.W.Nonlinear magic:Multiphoton are continuously being developed.In this regard,a significant new microscopy in the biosciences.Nature Biotechnol.21,1369-1377(2003). 23. benchmark has recently been achieved:a femtosecond laser suitable Mertz,J.Nonlinear microscopy:New techniques and applications.Curr. Opin.Neurobiol.14,610-616 (2004). for nonlinear microscopy can now be purchased at a price equiva- 24 Svoboda,K.Yasuda,R.Principles of two-photon excitation microscopy lent to that of a high-end microscope objective.Similarly,a broader and its applications to neuroscience.Neuron 50,823-839 (2006). class of optics are being optimized with specific application to fem- Sheetz,K.E.Squier,J.Ultrafast optics:Imaging and manipulating tosecond laser excitation and detection.These optical systems have biological systems.J.Appl.Phys.105,051101 (2009) higher throughput and are designed to deliver diffraction-limited 26. Carriles,R.et al.Invited review article:Imaging techniques for harmonic and focal spots and transform-limited pulse durations.As such,we can multiphoton absorption fluorescence microscopy.Rev.Sci.Instr.80, 081101(2009). envision future systems that will continue to push the boundaries of 27. Field,J.et al.Optimizing the fluorescent yield in two-photon laser scanning imaging,further compelling studies that will connect chemical and microscopy with dispersion compensation.Opt.Express 18, physiological processes to structure and function,which will pro- 13661-13672(2010). vide,for the first time,a comprehensive picture of organisms from Gannaway,J.N.Sheppard,C.J.R.Second-harmonic imaging in the the atomic to the macroscopic level. scanning optical microscope.Opt.Quant.Electron.10,435-439(1978) 29. Raghunathan,V.,Han,Y.,Korth,O.,Ge,N.H.Potma,E.Rapid vibrational imaging with sum frequency generation microscopy.Opt.Lett.30, 3891-3893(2011). References 30. Fu,D.et al.Quantitative chemical imaging with multiplex stimulated Ramar 1. Denk,W.,Strickler,J.H.Webb,W.W.Two-photon laser scanning scattering microscopy.J.Am.Chem.Soc.134,3623-3626(2012). fluorescence microscopy.Science 248,73-76(1990). 31. Zumbusch,A.,Holtom,G.R.Xie,X.S.Three-dimensional vibrational Peleg,G.,Lewis,A.,Linial,M.Loew,L.M.Nonlinear optical measurement imaging by coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering.Phys.Rev.Lett.82, of membrane potential around single molecules at selected cellular sites. 4142-4145(1999). Proc.Natl Acad.Sci.USA 96,6700-6704(1999). Chen,H.et al.A multimodal platform for nonlinear optical microscopy and Chu,S.W.et al.In vivo developmental biology study using noninvasive microspectroscopy.Opt.Express 17,1282-1290 (2009). multi-harmonic generation microscopy.Opt.Express 11, 33. Becker,W.Bergmann,A.Lifetime-resolved imaging in nonlinear 3093-3099(2003). microscopy in Handbook of Biomedical Nonlinear Optical Microscopy (eds Cheng.A.,Goncalves,J.T.,Golshani,P.,Arisaka,K.Portera-Cailliau Masters,B.So,P.)499-556(Oxford University,2008). C.Simultaneous two-photon calcium imaging at different depths with 34 Becker,W.et al.Fluorescence lifetime imaging by time-correlated single spatiotemporal multiplexing.Nat.Methods 8,139-142(2011). photon counting.Microsc.Res.Tech.63,58-66(2004). Stelzer,E.H.et al.Nonlinear absorption extends confocal fluorescence 35. Driscoll,J.D.et al.Photon counting,censor corrections,and lifetime microscopy into the ultra-violet regime and confines the illumination imaging for improved detection in two-photon microscopy./Neurophysiol. volume.OpL.Co1mum.104,223-228(1994). 105,3106-3113(2011). NATURE PHOTONICS VOL7|FEBRUARY 2013 www.nature.com/naturephotonics 99 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.All rights reserved

© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. NATURE PHOTONICS | VOL 7 | FEBRUARY 2013 | www.nature.com/naturephotonics 99 Remote focusing. Finally, most high-speed imaging has focused on techniques for the rapid raster scanning of lateral images. Recent developments have led to the ‘remote focusing’ technique, which allows rapid axial scanning of the beam101,102. This technique, when combined with a scan mirror system, permits novel access to bio￾logical systems, such as the ability to image an x–z plane or perform high-speed 3D imaging91,103,104. Remote focusing operates by modify￾ing the divergence of the beam at the back of the excitation objec￾tive, usually by imaging the objective’s stop to an upstream location, where a second ‘remote’ objective is used in conjunction with a mir￾ror at its focus. It is this second, remotely located objective–mirror combination that produces the necessary divergence at the excitation objective when the distance between the remote objective and mirror is adjusted. This configuration is similar to how a properly imaged scan-relay system is designed, although such a system operates on the angle at the back of the objective rather than the divergence. The abil￾ity to control the axial focus of the microscope by employing remote focusing represents a dramatic step forwards for biological imaging, as this allows biologists to examine specimens in three dimensions without moving either the object under examination or the objec￾tive used for imaging (Fig. 5)105. This change in imaging paradigm is significant because moving the specimen requires expensive stages and can introduce significant problems for ‘registering’ real-world coordinates in individual frames with any previously captured data. Although moving the objective might be considered as an alternative to translating the specimen, such an endeavour degrades the image quality by moving away from the ideal objective position and can introduce vibrations that negatively impact the image quality. Conclusion The landscape of MPM has grown enormously since the initial appli￾cation of TPEF microscopy by Denk et al.1 , and as such, no single article can truly do justice to the broad range of new technologies and novel explorations that have resulted. There are significant topics not addressed here, including pushing the resolution limits106–109, spec￾trally resolved imaging110 and multiphoton light sheet microscopy111. The future for MPM looks bright from many perspectives. New femtosecond laser sources that operate reliably with exceptional ease are continuously being developed. In this regard, a significant new benchmark has recently been achieved: a femtosecond laser suitable for nonlinear microscopy can now be purchased at a price equiva￾lent to that of a high-end microscope objective. Similarly, a broader class of optics are being optimized with specific application to fem￾tosecond laser excitation and detection. These optical systems have higher throughput and are designed to deliver diffraction-limited focal spots and transform-limited pulse durations. As such, we can envision future systems that will continue to push the boundaries of imaging, further compelling studies that will connect chemical and physiological processes to structure and function, which will pro￾vide, for the first time, a comprehensive picture of organisms from the atomic to the macroscopic level. References 1. Denk, W., Strickler, J. H. & Webb, W. W. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 248, 73–76 (1990). 2. Peleg, G., Lewis, A., Linial, M. & Loew, L. M. Nonlinear optical measurement of membrane potential around single molecules at selected cellular sites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6700–6704 (1999). 3. Chu, S. W. et al. In vivo developmental biology study using noninvasive multi-harmonic generation microscopy. Opt. Express 11, 3093–3099 (2003). 4. Cheng, A., Gonçalves, J. T., Golshani, P., Arisaka, K. & Portera-Cailliau, C. Simultaneous two-photon calcium imaging at different depths with spatiotemporal multiplexing. Nat. Methods 8, 139–142 (2011). 5. Stelzer, E. H. et al. Nonlinear absorption extends confocal fluorescence microscopy into the ultra-violet regime and confines the illumination volume. Opt. Commun. 104, 223–228 (1994). 6. Chen, I. H., Chu, S. W., Sun, C. K., Cheng, P. C. & Lin, B. L. Wavelength dependent damage in biological multi-photon confocal microscopy: A micro-spectroscopic comparison between femtosecond Ti:sapphire and Cr:forsterite laser sources. Opt. Quant. Electron. 34, 1251–1266 (2002). 7. Helmchen, F. & Denk, W. Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nat. Methods 2, 932–940 (2005). 8. Yaroslavsky, A. N. et al. Optical properties of selected native and coagulated human brain tissues in vitro in the visible and near infrared spectral range. Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 2059–2073 (2002). 9. Theer, P. & Denk, W. On the fundamental imaging-depth limit in two￾photon microscopy. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 3139–3149 (2006). 10. Kobat, D. et al. Deep tissue multiphoton microscopy using longer wavelength excitation. Opt. Express 17, 13354–13364 (2009). 11. Ntziachristos, V. Going deeper than microscopy: The optical imaging frontier in biology. Nat. Methods 7, 603–614 (2010). 12. Barad, Y., Eisenberg, H., Horowitz, M. & Silberberg, Y. Nonlinear scanning laser microscopy by third harmonic generation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 922–924 (1997). 13. Masihzadeh, O., Schlup, P. & Bartels, R. A. Label-free second harmonic generation holographic microscopy of biological specimens. Opt. Express 18, 9840–9851 (2010). 14. Zhuo, S. et al. Label-free monitoring of colonic cancer progression using multiphoton microscopy. Biomed. Opt. Express 2, 615–619 (2011). 15. Segawa, H. et al. Label-free tetra-modal molecular imaging of living cells with CARS, SHG, THG and TSFG (coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering, second harmonic generation, third harmonic generation and third-order sum frequency generation). Opt. Express 20, 9551–9557 (2012). 16. Theer, P., Hasan, M. T. & Denk, W. Two-photon imaging to a depth of 1000 μm in living brains by use of a Ti:Al2O3 regenerative amplifier. Opt. Lett. 28, 1022–1024 (2003). 17. Yue, S., Slipchenko, M. & Cheng, J. X. Multimodal nonlinear optical microscopy. Las. Photon. Rev. 5, 496–512 (2011). 18. Chung, C. Y., Boik, J. & Potma, E. O. Biomolecular imaging with coherent nonlinear vibrational microscopy. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 64, 77–99 (2013). 19. Larson, A. & Yeh, A. Ex vivo characterization of sub-10-fs pulses. Opt. Lett. 31, 1681–1683 (2006). 20. Pestov, D., Xu, B., Li, H. & Dantus, M. Delivery and characterization of sub- 8fs laser pulses at the imaging plane of a two-photon microscope. Proc. SPIE 7903, 79033B (2011). 21. Selm, R., Krauss, G., Leitenstorfer, A. & Zumbusch, A. Simultaneous second￾harmonic generation, third-harmonic generation, and four-wave mixing microscopy with single sub-8 fs laser pulses. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 181124 (2011). 22. Zipfel, W., Williams, R. & Webb, W. W. Nonlinear magic: Multiphoton microscopy in the biosciences. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 1369–1377 (2003). 23. Mertz, J. Nonlinear microscopy: New techniques and applications. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 610–616 (2004). 24. Svoboda, K. & Yasuda, R. Principles of two-photon excitation microscopy and its applications to neuroscience. Neuron 50, 823–839 (2006). 25. Sheetz, K. E. & Squier, J. Ultrafast optics: Imaging and manipulating biological systems. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 051101 (2009). 26. Carriles, R. et al. Invited review article: Imaging techniques for harmonic and multiphoton absorption fluorescence microscopy. Rev. Sci. Instr. 80, 081101 (2009). 27. Field, J. et al. Optimizing the fluorescent yield in two-photon laser scanning microscopy with dispersion compensation. Opt. Express 18, 13661–13672 (2010). 28. Gannaway, J. N. & Sheppard, C. J. R. Second-harmonic imaging in the scanning optical microscope. Opt. Quant. Electron. 10, 435–439 (1978). 29. Raghunathan, V., Han, Y., Korth, O., Ge, N. H. & Potma, E. Rapid vibrational imaging with sum frequency generation microscopy. Opt. Lett. 30, 3891–3893 (2011). 30. Fu, D. et al. Quantitative chemical imaging with multiplex stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 3623–3626 (2012). 31. Zumbusch, A., Holtom, G. R. & Xie, X. S. Three-dimensional vibrational imaging by coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4142–4145 (1999). 32. Chen, H. et al. A multimodal platform for nonlinear optical microscopy and microspectroscopy. Opt. Express 17, 1282–1290 (2009). 33. Becker, W. & Bergmann, A. Lifetime-resolved imaging in nonlinear microscopy in Handbook of Biomedical Nonlinear Optical Microscopy (eds Masters, B. & So, P.) 499–556 (Oxford University, 2008). 34. Becker, W. et al. Fluorescence lifetime imaging by time-correlated single photon counting. Microsc. Res. Tech. 63, 58–66 (2004). 35. Driscoll, J. D. et al. Photon counting, censor corrections, and lifetime imaging for improved detection in two-photon microscopy. J. Neurophysiol. 105, 3106–3113 (2011). NATURE PHOTONICS DOI: 10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361 REVIEW ARTICLES

REVIEW ARTICLES NATURE PHOTONICS DOL:10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361 36. Pastrirk.I..Cruz,L.Walowicz.K.,Lozovoy,V.Dantus,M.Selective 66. Albert,O.,Sherman,L.,Mourou,G.Norris,T.B.Smart microscope:An two-photon microscopy with shaped femtosecond pulses.Opt.Express 11, adaptive optics learning system for aberration correction in multiphoton 1695-1701(2003) confocal microscopy.Opt.Lett.25,52-54(2000). 37.Cruz.I.Pastirk.I..Comstock.M..Lozovoy,V.Dantus,M.Use of coherent 67. Booth,M.J.,Neil,M.A.A..Juskaitis,R.Wilson,T.Adaptive aberration control methods through scattering biological tissue to achieve functional correction in a confocal microscope.Proc.Natl Acad Sci USA99, imaging.Proc.Natl Acad.Sci.USA 101,16996-17001(2004). 5788-579220021 38. Cruz,J.,Pastirk,I.,Comstock,M.Dantus,M.Multiphoton intrapulse 68 Ji,N.,Milkie,D.Betzig.E.Adaptive optics via pupil segmentation for high- interference:Coherent control through scattering tissue.Opt.Express 12. resolution imaging in biological tissues.Nat.Methods 7,141-147 (2009). 4144-41492004】. 69. Leray,A.Mertz,J.Rejection of two-photon fluorescence background in 39. Meshulach,D.Silberberg.Y.Coherent quantum control of two-photon thick tissues by differential aberration imaging.Opt.Express 14, transitions by a femtosecond laser pulse.Nature 396,239-242(1998). 10565-10573(2006). 40. Pillai,R.et al.Multiplexed two-photon microscopy of dynamic biological 10. Girkin,I.M.,Poland,S.Wright,A.J.Adaptive optics for deeper imaging of samples with shaped broadband pulses.Opt.Express 17,12741-12752(2009). biological samples.Curr.Opin.Biotechnol.20,106-110(2009). 41. Fischer,M.et al.Two-photon absorption and self-phase modulation 1 Facomprez,A.,Beaurepaire,E.Debarre,D.Accuracy of correction in measurements with shaped femtosecond laser pulses.Opt.Lett.30, modal sensorless adaptive optics.Opt.Express 20,2598-2612(2012). 1551-1553(2005). Bewersdorf,J.,Pick,R.Hell,S.W.Multifocal multiphoton microscopy. 42. Fischer,M..Liu,H.,Piletic,I.Warren,W.Simultaneous self-phase 0pt.Let.23,655-657(1998). modulation and two-photon absorption measurement by a spectra 73. Buist,A.H.,Muller,M.,Squier,J.Brakenhoff,G.J.Real time two-photon homodyne Z-scan method.Opt.Express 16,4192-4205(2008). absorption microscopy using multi point excitation.I.Microsc.192, 43. Fischer,M.et al.Self-phase modulation signatures of neuronal activity.Opt. 217-226(1998). Lett.33219-221(2008). 74. Straub,M.Hell,S.W.Multifocal multiphoton microscopy:A fast and Beaurepaire,E.,Oheim,M.Mertz,J.Ultra-deep two-photon fluorescence efficient tool for 3-D fluorescence imaging.Bioimaging6,177-185(1998). excitation in turbid media.Opt.Commun.188,25-29 (2001). 75. Egner,A.&Hell,S.W.Time multiplexing and parallelization in multifocal Ohem,M.,Beaurepaire,EChaigneau,E.,Mertz,.&Charpak,S.Two- multiphoton microscopy.J.Opt.Soc.Am.A 17,1192-201 (2000). photon microsscopy in brain tissue:Parameters influencing the imaging 76. Nielsen,T.,Fricke,M.,Hellweg,D.Andresen,P.High efficiency beam depth.J.Neurosci.Meth.111,29-37 (2001). splitter for multifocal multiphoton microscopy Microsc.201, 46. Buehler,C.,Kim,K.H.,Dong.C.Y.,Masters,B.So,P.T.C.Innovations 368-376(2001). in two-photon deep tissue microscopy.Eng.Med.Biol.Mag.18, 1 Bahlmann,K.et al.Multifocal multiphoton microscopy (MMM)at a frame 23-30(1999). rate beyond 600 Hz.Opt.Express 15,10991-10998(2007). Kobat,D.,Horton,N.G.Xu,C.In vivo two-photon microscopy to 1.6-mm 78. Niesner,R.,Andresen,V..Neumann,J.,Spiecker,H.Gunzer,M.The depth in mouse cortex.J.Biomed.Opt.16,106014(2011) power of single and multibeam two-photon microscopy for high-resolution 48. Balu,M.et al.Effect of excitation wavelength on penetration depth in and high-speed deep tissue and intravital imaging.Biophys.I.93, nonlinear optical microscopy of turbid media.J.Biomed.Opt.14, 2519-2529(2007). 010508(2009). 79. Kim,K.H.et al.Multifocal multiphoton microscopy based on multianode 49. Chu,S.W.et al.Multimodal nonlinear spectral microscopy based on a photomultiplier tubes.Opt.Express 15,11658-11678(2007). femtosecond Cr:forsterite laser.Opt.Lett.26,1909-1911 (2001) 0 Lee,A.M.D.et al.In vivo video rate multiphoton microscopy imaging of Levene,M.J.,Dombeck,D.A.,Kasischke,K.A.,Molloy,R.P.Webb,W.W. human skin.Opt.Lett.36,2865-2867 (2011). In vivo multiphoton microscopy of deep brain tissue.I.Neurophysiol.91, 81. Fan,G.,Fujisaki,H.,Miyakawi,A.,Tsien,R.Ellisman,M.Video-rate 1908-1912(2004). scanning two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy and ratio imaging 51 Jung,W.et al.Miniaturized probe based on a microelectromechanical with chameleons.Biophys..76,2412-2420(1999). system mirror for multiphoton microscopy.Opt.Lett.33, 82. Veilleux,I.,Spencer,J.A.,Biss,D.P,Cote,D.Lin,C.P.In vivo cell tracking 1324-1326(2008). with video rate multimodality laser scanning microscopy.IEEEI.Sel.Top. Chia,S.H.et al.Miniaturized video-rate epi-third-harmonic-generation Quant.Electron.14,10-18 (2008). fiber-microscope.Opt.Express 18,17382-17391(2010). Grewe,B.E,Voigt,F.E,van't Hoff,M.Helmchen,E Fast two-layer two- 53. Saar,B.G.Johnston,R.S..Freudiger,C.W,Xie,X.S.&Seibel,E J.Coherent photon imaging of neuronal cell populations using an electrically tunable Raman scanning fiber endoscopy.Opt.Left.36,2396-2398(2011). lens.Biomed.Opt.Express 2,2035-2046(2011). 54 Rivera,D.R.,Brown,C.M.,Ouzounov,D.G.,Webb,W.W.Xu,C. 84 Bullen,A.,Patel,S.Saggau,P.High-speed,random-access fluorescence Multifocal multiphoton endoscope.Opt.Lett.37,1349-1351 (2012) microscopy:I.High-resolution optical recording with voltage-sensitive dyes Martini,I.et al.Multifocal two-photon laser scanning microscopy combined and ion indicators.Biophrys.I.73,477-491(1997). with photo-activatable GFP for in vivo monitoring of intracellular protein 85. Shao,Y.et al.Ultrafast,large-field multiphoton microscopy based on dynamics in real time.I.Struct.Biol.158,401-409 (2007). an acousto-optic deflector and a spatial light modulator.Opt.Lett.37 56. Chen,Z.,Wei,L.,Zhu,X.Min,W.Extending the fundamental imaging- 2532-2534(2012). depth limit of multi-photon microscopy by imaging with photo-activatable 86. Salomea.R.et al.Ultrafast random-access scanning in two-photon fluorophores.Opt.Express 20,18525-18536(2012). microscopy using acousto-optic deflectors.J.Neurosci.Meth.154, 57. Cheng.P.C.et al.Highly efficient upconverters for multiphoton fluorescence 161-74(2006). microscopy.I.Microsc.189,199-212(1998). 87. Reddy,G.D.,Kelleher,K.,Fink,R.Saggau,P.Three-dimensional random 58 Extermann,J.et al.Nanodoublers as deep imaging markers for multi-photon access multiphoton microscopy for functional imaging of neuronal activity. microscopy.Opt.Express 17,15342-15349(2009). Nature Neurosci.11,713-720 (2008). 59. Zinter,J.P.Levene,M.I.Maximizing fluorescence collection efficiency in 88. Koenig,K.,Liang,H.,Berns,M.Tromberg,B.J.Cell damage in near- multiphoton microscopy.Opt.Express 19,15348-15362(2011). infrared multimode optical traps as a result of multiphoton absorption.Opt 60. Amir,W.et al.Simultaneous imaging of multiple focal planes using a two Ltt.21.1090-1092(1996). photon scanning microscope.Opt.Lett.32,1731-1733(2007). 89. Kirkby,P.A.,Nadella,K.M.N.S.Silver,R.A.A compact acousto-optic 61. Carriles,R,Sheetz,K.E.,Hoover,E.E.Squier,J.A.Barzda,V. lens for 2D and 3D femtosecond based 2-photon microscopy.Opt.Express Simultaneous multifocal,multiphoton,photon counting microscopy.Opt. 18,13721-13745(2010). Express16,10364-10371(2008). 90. Kremer,Y.et al.A spatio-temporally compensated acousto-optic scanner 62. Benninger,R.K.P.,Ashby,W.J,Ring,E.A.Piston,D.W.Single-photon- for two-photon microscopy providing large field of view.Opt.Express 16, counting detector for increased sensitivity in two-photon laser scanning 10066-10076(2008). microscopy.Opt.Lett.33,2895-2897 (2008). 91. Botcherby,E.J.et al.Aberration-free three-dimensional multiphoton Sandkuijl,D.,Cisek,R.,Major,A.Barzda,V.Differential microscopy for imaging of neuronal activity at kHz rates.Proc.Natl Acad.Sci.USA 109 fluorescence-detected nonlinear absorption linear anisotropy based on a 2919-2924(2012). staggered two-beam femtosecond Yb:KGW oscillator.Biomed.Opt.Express 92. Brakenhoff,G.J.et al.Real-time two-photon confocal microscopy using a 1,895-901(2010). femtosecond,amplified Ti:sapphire system.J.Microsc.181,253-259(1996) 64. Sherman,L.Ye,J.Y.,Albert,O.Norris,T.B.Adaptive correction of depth- Oron,D.,Tal,E.Silberberg,Y.Scanningless depth-resolved microscopy. induced aberrations in multiphoton scanning microscopy using a deformable Opt.Express13,1468-1476(2005). mirror.J.Microsc.206,65-71 (2002). 94. Zhu,G.,van Howe,J,Durst,M.,Zipfel,W.R.Xu,C.Simultaneous spatial 65. Neil,M.A.A.et al.Adaptive aberration correction in a two-photon and temporal focusing of femtosecond pulses.Opt.Express 13, microscope.J.Microsc.200,105-108(2000) 2153-2159(2005). 100 NATURE PHOTONICS VOL 7 FEBRUARY 2013 www.nature.com/naturephotonics 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.All rights reserved

© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. 100 NATURE PHOTONICS | VOL 7 | FEBRUARY 2013 | www.nature.com/naturephotonics 36. Pastrirk, I., Cruz, J., Walowicz, K., Lozovoy, V. & Dantus, M. Selective two-photon microscopy with shaped femtosecond pulses. Opt. Express 11, 1695–1701 (2003). 37. Cruz, J., Pastirk, I., Comstock, M., Lozovoy, V. & Dantus, M. Use of coherent control methods through scattering biological tissue to achieve functional imaging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16996–17001 (2004). 38. Cruz, J., Pastirk, I., Comstock, M. & Dantus, M. Multiphoton intrapulse interference: Coherent control through scattering tissue. Opt. Express 12, 4144–4149 (2004). 39. Meshulach, D. & Silberberg, Y. Coherent quantum control of two-photon transitions by a femtosecond laser pulse. Nature 396, 239–242 (1998). 40. Pillai, R. et al. Multiplexed two-photon microscopy of dynamic biological samples with shaped broadband pulses. Opt. Express 17, 12741–12752 (2009). 41. Fischer, M. et al. Two-photon absorption and self-phase modulation measurements with shaped femtosecond laser pulses. Opt. Lett. 30, 1551–1553 (2005). 42. Fischer, M., Liu, H., Piletic, I. & Warren, W. Simultaneous self-phase modulation and two-photon absorption measurement by a spectral homodyne Z-scan method. Opt. Express 16, 4192–4205 (2008). 43. Fischer, M. et al. Self-phase modulation signatures of neuronal activity. Opt. Lett. 33, 219–221 (2008). 44. Beaurepaire, E., Oheim, M. & Mertz, J. Ultra-deep two-photon fluorescence excitation in turbid media. Opt. Commun. 188, 25–29 (2001). 45. Ohem, M., Beaurepaire, E., Chaigneau, E., Mertz, J. & Charpak, S. Two￾photon microsscopy in brain tissue: Parameters influencing the imaging depth. J. Neurosci. Meth. 111, 29–37 (2001). 46. Buehler, C., Kim, K. H., Dong, C. Y., Masters, B. & So, P. T. C. Innovations in two-photon deep tissue microscopy. Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 18, 23–30 (1999). 47. Kobat, D., Horton, N. G. & Xu, C. In vivo two-photon microscopy to 1.6-mm depth in mouse cortex. J. Biomed. Opt. 16, 106014 (2011). 48. Balu, M. et al. Effect of excitation wavelength on penetration depth in nonlinear optical microscopy of turbid media. J. Biomed. Opt. 14, 010508 (2009). 49. Chu, S. W. et al. Multimodal nonlinear spectral microscopy based on a femtosecond Cr:forsterite laser. Opt. Lett. 26, 1909–1911 (2001). 50. Levene, M. J., Dombeck, D. A., Kasischke, K. A., Molloy, R. P. & Webb, W. W. In vivo multiphoton microscopy of deep brain tissue. J. Neurophysiol. 91, 1908–1912 (2004). 51. Jung, W. et al. Miniaturized probe based on a microelectromechanical system mirror for multiphoton microscopy. Opt. Lett. 33, 1324–1326 (2008). 52. Chia, S. H. et al. Miniaturized video-rate epi-third-harmonic-generation fiber-microscope. Opt. Express 18, 17382–17391 (2010). 53. Saar, B. G., Johnston, R. S., Freudiger, C. W., Xie, X. S. & Seibel, E. J. Coherent Raman scanning fiber endoscopy. Opt. Lett. 36, 2396–2398 (2011). 54. Rivera, D. R., Brown, C. M., Ouzounov, D. G., Webb, W. W. & Xu, C. Multifocal multiphoton endoscope. Opt. Lett. 37, 1349–1351 (2012). 55. Martini, J. et al. Multifocal two-photon laser scanning microscopy combined with photo-activatable GFP for in vivo monitoring of intracellular protein dynamics in real time. J. Struct. Biol. 158, 401–409 (2007). 56. Chen, Z., Wei, L., Zhu, X. & Min, W. Extending the fundamental imaging￾depth limit of multi-photon microscopy by imaging with photo-activatable fluorophores. Opt. Express 20, 18525–18536 (2012). 57. Cheng, P. C. et al. Highly efficient upconverters for multiphoton fluorescence microscopy. J. Microsc. 189, 199–212 (1998). 58. Extermann, J. et al. Nanodoublers as deep imaging markers for multi-photon microscopy. Opt. Express 17, 15342–15349 (2009). 59. Zinter, J. P. & Levene, M. J. Maximizing fluorescence collection efficiency in multiphoton microscopy. Opt. Express 19, 15348–15362 (2011). 60. Amir, W. et al. Simultaneous imaging of multiple focal planes using a two￾photon scanning microscope. Opt. Lett. 32, 1731–1733 (2007). 61. Carriles, R., Sheetz, K. E., Hoover, E. E., Squier, J. A. & Barzda, V. Simultaneous multifocal, multiphoton, photon counting microscopy. Opt. Express 16, 10364–10371 (2008). 62. Benninger, R. K. P., Ashby, W. J., Ring, E. A. & Piston, D. W. Single-photon￾counting detector for increased sensitivity in two-photon laser scanning microscopy. Opt. Lett. 33, 2895–2897 (2008). 63. Sandkuijl, D., Cisek, R., Major, A. & Barzda, V. Differential microscopy for fluorescence-detected nonlinear absorption linear anisotropy based on a staggered two-beam femtosecond Yb:KGW oscillator. Biomed. Opt. Express 1, 895–901 (2010). 64. Sherman, L., Ye, J. Y., Albert, O. & Norris, T. B. Adaptive correction of depth￾induced aberrations in multiphoton scanning microscopy using a deformable mirror. J. Microsc. 206, 65–71 (2002). 65. Neil, M. A. A. et al. Adaptive aberration correction in a two-photon microscope. J. Microsc. 200, 105–108 (2000). 66. Albert, O., Sherman, L., Mourou, G. & Norris, T. B. Smart microscope: An adaptive optics learning system for aberration correction in multiphoton confocal microscopy. Opt. Lett. 25, 52–54 (2000). 67. Booth, M. J., Neil, M. A. A., Juškaitis, R. & Wilson, T. Adaptive aberration correction in a confocal microscope. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5788–5792 (2002). 68. Ji, N., Milkie, D. & Betzig, E. Adaptive optics via pupil segmentation for high￾resolution imaging in biological tissues. Nat. Methods 7, 141–147 (2009). 69. Leray, A. & Mertz, J. Rejection of two-photon fluorescence background in thick tissues by differential aberration imaging. Opt. Express 14, 10565–10573 (2006). 70. Girkin, J. M., Poland, S. & Wright, A. J. Adaptive optics for deeper imaging of biological samples. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 20, 106–110 (2009). 71. Facomprez, A., Beaurepaire, E. & Débarre, D. Accuracy of correction in modal sensorless adaptive optics. Opt. Express 20, 2598–2612 (2012). 72. Bewersdorf, J., Pick, R. & Hell, S. W. Multifocal multiphoton microscopy. Opt. Lett. 23, 655–657 (1998). 73. Buist, A. H., Müller, M., Squier, J. & Brakenhoff, G. J. Real time two-photon absorption microscopy using multi point excitation. J. Microsc. 192, 217–226 (1998). 74. Straub, M. & Hell, S. W. Multifocal multiphoton microscopy: A fast and efficient tool for 3-D fluorescence imaging. Bioimaging 6, 177–185 (1998). 75. Egner, A. & Hell, S. W. Time multiplexing and parallelization in multifocal multiphoton microscopy. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 1192–201 (2000). 76. Nielsen, T., Fricke, M., Hellweg, D. & Andresen, P. High efficiency beam splitter for multifocal multiphoton microscopy. J. Microsc. 201, 368–376 (2001). 77. Bahlmann, K. et al. Multifocal multiphoton microscopy (MMM) at a frame rate beyond 600 Hz. Opt. Express 15, 10991–10998 (2007). 78. Niesner, R., Andresen, V., Neumann, J., Spiecker, H. & Gunzer, M. The power of single and multibeam two-photon microscopy for high-resolution and high-speed deep tissue and intravital imaging. Biophys. J. 93, 2519–2529 (2007). 79. Kim, K. H. et al. Multifocal multiphoton microscopy based on multianode photomultiplier tubes. Opt. Express 15, 11658–11678 (2007). 80. Lee, A. M. D. et al. In vivo video rate multiphoton microscopy imaging of human skin. Opt. Lett. 36, 2865–2867 (2011). 81. Fan, G., Fujisaki, H., Miyakawi, A., Tsien, R. & Ellisman, M. Video-rate scanning two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy and ratio imaging with chameleons. Biophys. J. 76, 2412–2420 (1999). 82. Veilleux, I., Spencer, J. A., Biss, D. P., Côtè, D. & Lin, C. P. In vivo cell tracking with video rate multimodality laser scanning microscopy. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 14, 10–18 (2008). 83. Grewe, B. F., Voigt, F. F., van’t Hoff, M. & Helmchen, F. Fast two-layer two￾photon imaging of neuronal cell populations using an electrically tunable lens. Biomed. Opt. Express 2, 2035–2046 (2011). 84. Bullen, A., Patel, S. & Saggau, P. High-speed, random-access fluorescence microscopy: I. High-resolution optical recording with voltage-sensitive dyes and ion indicators. Biophys. J. 73, 477–491 (1997). 85. Shao, Y. et al. Ultrafast, large-field multiphoton microscopy based on an acousto-optic deflector and a spatial light modulator. Opt. Lett. 37, 2532–2534 (2012). 86. Saloméa, R. et al. Ultrafast random-access scanning in two-photon microscopy using acousto-optic deflectors. J. Neurosci. Meth. 154, 161–74 (2006). 87. Reddy, G. D., Kelleher, K., Fink, R. & Saggau, P. Three-dimensional random access multiphoton microscopy for functional imaging of neuronal activity. Nature Neurosci. 11, 713–720 (2008). 88. Koenig, K., Liang, H., Berns, M. & Tromberg, B. J. Cell damage in near￾infrared multimode optical traps as a result of multiphoton absorption. Opt. Lett. 21, 1090–1092 (1996). 89. Kirkby, P. A., Nadella, K. M. N. S. & Silver, R. A. A compact acousto-optic lens for 2D and 3D femtosecond based 2-photon microscopy. Opt. Express 18, 13721–13745 (2010). 90. Kremer, Y. et al. A spatio-temporally compensated acousto-optic scanner for two-photon microscopy providing large field of view. Opt. Express 16, 10066–10076 (2008). 91. Botcherby, E. J. et al. Aberration-free three-dimensional multiphoton imaging of neuronal activity at kHz rates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 2919–2924 (2012). 92. Brakenhoff, G. J. et al. Real-time two-photon confocal microscopy using a femtosecond, amplified Ti:sapphire system. J. Microsc. 181, 253–259 (1996). 93. Oron, D., Tal, E. & Silberberg, Y. Scanningless depth-resolved microscopy. Opt. Express 13, 1468–1476 (2005). 94. Zhu, G., van Howe, J., Durst, M., Zipfel, W. R. & Xu, C. Simultaneous spatial and temporal focusing of femtosecond pulses. Opt. Express 13, 2153–2159 (2005). REVIEW ARTICLES NATURE PHOTONICS DOI: 10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361

NATURE PHOTONICS DOL:10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361 REVIEW ARTICLES 95.Therrien.O.D..Aube,B..Pages,S..De Koninck.P.&Cote,D.Wide-field 106.Hell,S.W.Wichmann,I.Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by multiphoton imaging of cellular dynamics in thick tissue by temporal stimulated emission:Stimulated emission depletion fluorescence microscopy. focusing and patterned illumination.Biomed.Opt.Express 2, 0pt.Lett.19,780-782(1994). 696-704(2011). 107.Betzig.E.etal Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer 96. Cheng,L C.et al.Spatiotemporal focusing-based widefield multiphoton resolution.Science 313,1642-1645 (2006). microscopy for fast optical sectioning.Opt.Express 20,8939-8948(2012). 108.Huang,B.,Wengin,W.Zhuang.X.Three-dimensional super-resolution 97. Durst,M.E.,Zhu,G.Xu,C.Simultaneous spatial and temporal focusing in imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy.Science 319, nonlinear microscopy.Opt.Commun.281,1796-1805(2008). 810-813(2008). 98.Durst,M.E.Straub,A.A.Xu,C.Enhanced axial confinement of sum- 109.Hell,S.W.,Schmidt,R.Egner,A.Diffraction-unlimited three- frequency generation in a temporal focusing setup.Opt.Lett.34, dimensional optical nanoscopy with opposing lenses.Nature Photon.3, 1786-1788(2009). 381-387(2009). 99. Mohanty,S.K.et al.In-depth activation of channelrhodopsin 2-sensitized 110.Wachsmann-Hogiu,S.Farkas,D.L.Nonlinear multispectral optical excitable cells with high spatial resolution using two-photon excitation with a imaging microscopy:Concepts,instrumentation,and applications in near-infrared laser microbeam.Biophys.J.95,3916-3926(2008). Handbook of Biomedical Nonlinear Optical Microscopy 461-480 (Oxford 100. Andrasfalvy,B.K.,Zemelman,B.V.,Tang..Vaziri,A.Two-photon single- University,2008). cell optogenetic control of neuronal activity by sculpted light.Proc.Natl 111.Truong,T.,Supatto,W.,Koos,D.,Choi,J.&Fraser,S.Deep and fast live Acad.Scd.USA107,11981-11986(2010). imaging with two-photon scanned light-sheet microscopy.Nat.Methods 8, 101.Botcherby,E.J,Booth,M.J,Juskaitis,R.&Wilson,T.Real-time extended 757-760(2011). depth of field microscopy.Opt.Express 16,21843-21848(2008). 102.Botcherby,E.Booth,M.Juskaitis,R.&Wilson,T.Real-time slit scanning microscopy in the meridional plane.Opt.Lett.34,1504-1506(2009). Acknowledgments 103.Hoover,E.E.et al.Remote focusing for programmable multi-layer The authors recognize the support of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and differential multiphoton microscopy.Biomed.Opt.Express 2,113-122(2010). Bioengineering under the Bioengineering Research Partnership EB-003832.In addition, the authors thank E.Toberer for his assistance in preparing portions of this manuscript. 104.Anselmi,F,Ventalon,C..Begue,A.,Ogden,D.Emiliani,V.Three- dimensional imaging and photostimulation by remote-focusing and holographic light patterning.Proc.Natl Acad.Sci.USA 108, Additional information 19504-19509(2011). Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to E.E.H.and L.A.S. 105.Hoover,E.E.et al.Eliminating the scattering ambiguity in multifocal multimodal,multiphoton imaging systems.I.Biophoton.5, Competing financial interests 425-436(2012). The authors declare no competing financial interests. NATURE PHOTONICS VOL 7|FEBRUARY 2013 www.nature.com/naturephotonics 101 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited.All rights reserved

© 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. NATURE PHOTONICS | VOL 7 | FEBRUARY 2013 | www.nature.com/naturephotonics 101 95. Therrien, O. D., Aubé, B., Pagès, S., De Koninck, P. & Côtè, D. Wide-field multiphoton imaging of cellular dynamics in thick tissue by temporal focusing and patterned illumination. Biomed. Opt. Express 2, 696–704 (2011). 96. Cheng, L. C. et al. Spatiotemporal focusing-based widefield multiphoton microscopy for fast optical sectioning. Opt. Express 20, 8939–8948 (2012). 97. Durst, M. E., Zhu, G. & Xu, C. Simultaneous spatial and temporal focusing in nonlinear microscopy. Opt. Commun. 281, 1796–1805 (2008). 98. Durst, M. E., Straub, A. A. & Xu, C. Enhanced axial confinement of sum￾frequency generation in a temporal focusing setup. Opt. Lett. 34, 1786–1788 (2009). 99. Mohanty, S. K. et al. In-depth activation of channelrhodopsin 2-sensitized excitable cells with high spatial resolution using two-photon excitation with a near-infrared laser microbeam. Biophys. J. 95, 3916–3926 (2008). 100. Andrasfalvy, B. K., Zemelman, B. V., Tang, J. & Vaziri, A. Two-photon single￾cell optogenetic control of neuronal activity by sculpted light. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11981–11986 (2010). 101. Botcherby, E. J., Booth, M. J., Juškaitis, R. & Wilson, T. Real-time extended depth of field microscopy. Opt. Express 16, 21843–21848 (2008). 102. Botcherby, E. J., Booth, M. J., Juškaitis, R. & Wilson, T. Real-time slit scanning microscopy in the meridional plane. Opt. Lett. 34, 1504–1506 (2009). 103. Hoover, E. E. et al. Remote focusing for programmable multi-layer differential multiphoton microscopy. Biomed. Opt. Express 2, 113–122 (2010). 104. Anselmi, F., Ventalon, C., Bègue, A., Ogden, D. & Emiliani, V. Three￾dimensional imaging and photostimulation by remote-focusing and holographic light patterning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19504–19509 (2011). 105. Hoover, E. E. et al. Eliminating the scattering ambiguity in multifocal, multimodal, multiphoton imaging systems. J. Biophoton. 5, 425–436 (2012). 106. Hell, S. W. & Wichmann, J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: Stimulated emission depletion fluorescence microscopy. Opt. Lett. 19, 780–782 (1994). 107. Betzig, E. et al. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 313, 1642–1645 (2006). 108. Huang, B., Wenqin, W. & Zhuang, X. Three-dimensional super-resolution imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy. Science 319, 810–813 (2008). 109. Hell, S. W., Schmidt, R. & Egner, A. Diffraction-unlimited three￾dimensional optical nanoscopy with opposing lenses. Nature Photon. 3, 381–387 (2009). 110. Wachsmann-Hogiu, S. & Farkas, D. L. Nonlinear multispectral optical imaging microscopy: Concepts, instrumentation, and applications in Handbook of Biomedical Nonlinear Optical Microscopy 461–480 (Oxford University, 2008). 111. Truong, T., Supatto, W., Koos, D., Choi, J. & Fraser, S. Deep and fast live imaging with two-photon scanned light-sheet microscopy. Nat. Methods 8, 757–760 (2011). Acknowledgments The authors recognize the support of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering under the Bioengineering Research Partnership EB-003832. In addition, the authors thank E. Toberer for his assistance in preparing portions of this manuscript. Additional information Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to E.E.H. and J.A.S. Competing financial interests The authors declare no competing financial interests. NATURE PHOTONICS DOI: 10.1038/NPHOTON.2013.361 REVIEW ARTICLES