Despite the apparent divergence in institutions of govenance, share ownership, capital markets, and business culture across developed economies, the basic law of the corporate form has already achieved a high degree of uniformity and continued convergence is likely. A principal reason for convergence is a widespread normative consensus that corporate managers should act exclusively in the economic interests of

This paper develops a model of the competition among states in providing corporate law rules. The analysis provides a full characterization of the equilibrium in this market Competition among states is shown to produce optimal rules with respect to issues that do not have a substantial effect on managers private benefits

Forthcoming in 2 STAN AGORA(2000). As David Millon so ably demonstrates, metaphor drives much of the debate within corporate law jurisprudence and corporate law scholarship. It has done so for decades, even centuries. Scholars have used metaphors-corporation as person, corporation as creature of the state, corporation as property, corporation as contract

1 Introductory remarks 1.1 Position of shareholders under Dutch company law Historically, the position of shareholders in Dutch companies has been rather weak, especially when compared with that of the board of directors. As far as we know, no serious investigation has ever been conducted into the question of why the board of directors of a Dutch company has such a strong

Corporate law is a field that underwent as thorough a revolution in the 1980s as can be imagined, in scholarship and practice, methodological and organizational, in which finance and the economic theory of the firm were used to inform the field. The timing of this revolution was not a fortuitous occurrence: it followed a revolution in corporate finance and

What is the common structure of the law of business corporations-or, as it would be put in the UK, company lawacross— national jurisdictions Although this question is rarely asked by corporate law scholars, it is critically important for the comparative investigation of corporate law. Recent scholar- e cor ship emphasizes the divergence among European, American, and Japanese cor- porations in corporate governance, share ownership, capital markets, and business culture. But, notwithstanding the very real differences across jurisdic- tions along these dimensions

This issue is an edited and annotated transcript of the proceedings at a symposium on the Next Century of Corporate Law, held on May 20-21 1999, at the DuPont Country Club, Wilmington, Delaware. The symposium tly by widener University School of Law and the Corporate Law Section of the Delaware State Bar Association We acknowledge with gratitude the following persons for their

第一讲 律师制度概述 一、律师和律师制度 二、我国律师的性质、业务和工作原则 三、律师资格与律师执业 四、律师的权利与义务 第二讲 律师参加刑事诉讼 第四讲 律师参加行政诉讼 第五讲 律师担任法律顾问 第六讲 律师代理仲裁 一、律师代理仲裁的概念 二、律师代理仲裁的委托 三、代理律师的工作 第七讲 律师办理的几种专项法律事务 一、律师办理金融、证券法律事务 二、律师办理知识产权法律事务 三、律师办理房地产法律事务 四、律师办理公司法律事务

一、市场信息不对称与 “市场失灵” 二、民法对市场信息不对称的防范和化解 • 2.1财产权法对市场经济主体权、 责、 利的确定和保障 • 2.2契约法对信息传递及主体行为的调整和约束 • 2.3现代公司制度对企业的有效监督和资本市场的促进 • 2.4知识产权法对市场经济主体信誉机制功能的维护和发挥

一、盗窃罪 以非法占有为目的，秘密窃取数额较大的公司财物或者多次盗窃的行为。 法律依据：《刑法》（264条）、《最高人民法院关于审理盗窃案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》（1998年3月17日起施行）