閤 An Experience-Weighted Measure of Employment and Unemployment duratior OR。 George A. Akerlof: Brian G. M. Main The American Economic Review, Vol 71, No. 5.(Dec, 1981), pp. 1003-1011 Stable url: http://inks.jstororg/sici?sici0002-8282%28198112%02971%03a5%3c1003%03aaemoea%3e2.0.c0%03b2-u The American Economic Review is currently published by American Economic Association Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.htmlJstOr'sTermsandConditionsofUseprovidesinpartthatunlessyouhaveobtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the jsTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at html Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that ap on the screen or printed page of such transmission STOR is an independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to and preserving a digital archive of scholarly journals. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support @jstor. org http://www.jstor.org Tue may 1511:15:052007
An Experience-Weighted Measure of Employment and Unemployment Durations George A. Akerlof; Brian G. M. Main The American Economic Review, Vol. 71, No. 5. (Dec., 1981), pp. 1003-1011. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%28198112%2971%3A5%3C1003%3AAEMOEA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-U The American Economic Review is currently published by American Economic Association. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/aea.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is an independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to and preserving a digital archive of scholarly journals. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. http://www.jstor.org Tue May 15 11:15:05 2007
An Experience-Weighted Measure of Employment and Unemployment durations By GEORGE A AKERLOF AND BRIAN G. M. MAIN* Kim Clark and Lawrence Summers(1979) tion, SEw. It appears that although the have recently established that while most age job is of short duration, most er unemployment spells are quite short, most ment is spent in jobs of longer than av average time spent in unemployment is spent in spells duration of longer than average duration. This ap The fact that both employment and unem- parent paradox is due to the fact that the ployment fall in spells of considerably greater most common measure of the average length length than is indicated by examination of of a spell of unemployment is an average of turnover statistics, is of considerable import all spell lengths terminating in a given period, to the standing of what has come to be herein labeled Srw. In this measure, all spells known as the"new view"of the labor market. are given the same weighting irrespective of ( See Martin Feldstein; Robert Hall; George he amount of unemployment for which they Perry. )In this view the labor market is full of account. Weighting each spell by its length movement with both employment and unem- would result in an experience-weighted mea- ployment occurring in relatively brief spells sure, herein labeled SEw, which would reflect That there is a lot of movement is a fact the length of spell in which a typical week of reflected in labor market turnover statistics unemployment is spent and, hence, avoid the As our empirical work will show, however, it Clark and Summ is erroneous to take these turnover statistics Our paper motivates this alternative mea- which reflect average movement through cer- re, Sew, and observes that in the steady tain states to reflect the average experience state a reasonable measure of this experi- of persons in these states. In both employ ence-weighted spell duration is twice the ment and unemployment there appears to be official Bureau of Labor Statistics(BLS) much more permanence than the new view average duration of uncompleted spells, allows. In our view, for most purposes, the herein labeled T. When this approach is ap- existence of many short spells of employ- plied to employment statistics, in the form of ment or unemployment is of little relevance job tenures, a sharp contrast is found be- if these spells in the aggregate contribute tween the average length of a job as reflected relatively little, respectively, to total employ in turnover statistics or the terminations- ment or total unemployment. This appears in weighted spell length, STw, and as measured fact to be the case since employment-years by the experience-weighted average job dura- and unemployment-weeks are in spells which are on average quite long. Section I will explain theoretically and by analogy the meaning of the various measures of average spell lengths and present some Economics and University of facts about their relationship to each other California-Berkeley, and University of Edinburgh, re- Section II displays estimates both of the Hajime Miyazaki, Charles O'Reilly, George Per length of the average completed spell and Stephen Salant, Elaine Sorenson, Jean Vanski, Clai of the Vickery, and Janet Yellen for valuable comments and length for various populations for job tenures assistance. We also like to thank the U.S. Department of and unemployment durations. Section II Labor for generous financial support under small grant contains some concluding remarks pertaining o.91-06-79-33, administered by the Institute of B ness and Economic Research of the University of Cali- to the ramifications of these results on labor fornia-Berkeley market policy
An Experience-Weighted Measure of Employment and Unemployment Durations Kim Clark and Lawrence Summers (1979) have recently established that whle most unemployment spells are quite short, most time spent in unemployment is spent in spells of longer than average duration. This apparent paradox is due to the fact that the most common measure of the average length of a spell of unemployment is an average of all spell lengths terminating in a given period, herein labeled ST,. In ths measure, all spells are given the same weighting irrespective of the amount of unemployment for which they account. Weighting each spell by its length would result in an experience-weighted measure, herein labeled SEW, whch would reflect the length of spell in whch a typical week of unemployment is spent and, hence, avoid the Clark and Summers paradox. Our paper motivates this alternative measure, SEW, and observes that in the steady state a reasonable measure of this experience-weighted spell duration is twice the official Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) average duration of uncompleted spells, herein labeled T. When this approach is applied to employment statistics, in the form of job tenures, a sharp contrast is found between the average length of a job as reflected in turnover statistics or the terminationsweighted spell length, ST,, and as measured by the experience-weighted average job dura- 'London School of Economics and University of California-Berkeley, and University of Edinburgh, respectively. We thank Todd Easton, Harvey Hamel, Hajime Myazaki, Charles O'Reilly, George Perry, Stephen Salant, Elaine Sorenson, Jean Vanski, Clair Vickery, and Janet Yellen for valuable comments and assistance. We also like to thank the U.S. Department of Labor for generous financial support under small grant no. 91-06-79-33, administered by the Institute of Business and Economic Research of the University of California-Berkeley. AND BRIANG. M. MAIN* tion, SEW. It appears that although the average job is of short duration, most employment is spent in jobs of longer than average duration. The fact that both employment and unemployment fall in spells of considerably greater length than is indicated by examination of turnover statistics, is of considerable import to the standing of what has come to be known as the "new view" of the labor market. (See Martin Feldstein; Robert Hall; George Perry.) In this view the labor market is full of movement with both employment and unemployment occurring in relatively brief spells. That there is a lot of movement is a fact reflected in labor market turnover statistics. As our empirical work will show, however, it is erroneous to take these turnover statistics which reflect average movement through certain states to reflect the average experience of persons in these states. In both employment and unemployment there appears lo be much more permanence than the new view allows. In our view, for most purposes, the existence of many short spells of employment or unemployment is of little relevance if these spells in the aggregate contribute relatively little, respectively, to total employment or total unemployment. This appears in fact to be the case since employment-Years and unemployment-weeks are in spells which are on average quite long. Section I will explain theoretically and by analogy the meaning of the various measures of average spell lengths and present some facts about their relationshp to each other. Section I1 displays estimates both of the length of the average completed spell and of the experience-weighted completed spell length for various populations for job tenures and unem~lovment . < durations. section 111 contains some concluding remarks pertaining to the ramifications of these results on labor market policy
THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW DECEMBER 198I I. Three Different Measures of Spell Length PERSON 1 A. Three Statistics Defined and Explained with Use of a diagram PERsOn 22 The different es of durations statis- PE RSON 3 ence to Figure 1(which is adapted from a similar diagram by Stephen saint Let the PERSON 4 S41 horizontal lines in Figure 1 represent the periods during which persons (labeled on the vertical axis) are unemployed. (An exactly PERSON 5 analogous figure could be drawn for job PERSON 6 Now consider three possible measures of employment duration. The first measure is Date of Interview Calendar Time the one commonly reported. Suppose that at date to a poll is taken which records how FIGURE 1 have been out of work. In terms of the iagram, Person l has been out of work for a length of time T, Person 2 for a length of time T2, Person 5 for a length of time Ts, and measure of the average length of unemploy Person 6 for a length of time T6. Persons 3 ment. This measure consists of the average and 4 are not out of work, and therefore length of all spells of unemployment, where eir unemployment durations are not re- the spells are not defined to be those in corded in the sample. An average computed progress at a given point in time, as in Sew, from the durations out of work of those but are those spells which are observed to employed at time of inte terminate over a given period of time. In such an average each spell counts exactly once, irrespective of its total contribution to T=(T1+T2+T+T6)/4 unemployment In terms of Figure I such an average would be This statistic T corresponds to the official statistics on mean duration of unemploy Srw=(S1+S2+S31+S32 ment reported by the bls There is at least one sense in which this statistic is lacking. The times T, T2, T5, and T6 do not report the completed length of the taking into account the two repeat spells of pells of persons l, 2, 5, and 6, respectively, persons 3 and 4. This statistic is represented but only the length of their interrupted spell, by the symbol STw, where TW mnemoni which is for each person an obviously shorter cally represents"termination-weighted "The phenomenon. In terms of the diagram, the time period over which these terminations verage completed length of unemployment have been averaged in the literature has com- spells of the currently unemployed is only been the calendar year(see Hyman SEw=(S1+S2+S5+S)/4. Kaitz and salant) In contrast to Srw, which weights all spells equally, the chances of sampling a given spell S is Salant's notation for completed length of at a given point in time is proportional to its spell. The subscripts EW stand for"experi- length. For this reason in steady state the ence-weighted"spell length, as shall be ex- average of completed spells at a given point in time(to for example) is equivalent to a
1004 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW DECEMBER 1981 I. Three Different Measures of Spell Length PERSON 1 J--- A. Three Statistics Defined and Explained with Use of a Diagram The different measures of durations statisPERSON 2 ,+ tics can be most easily explained by refer- c( ence to Figure 1 (whlch is adapted from a similar diagram by Stephen Salant). Let the PERSON 4 horizontal lines in Figure 1 represent the periods during which persons (labeled on the PERSON 5 ,75-p7 vertical axis) are unemployed. (An exactly analogous figure could be drawn for job tenures.) PERSON 6 ,* Now consider three possible measures of unemployment duration. The first measure is the one commonly reported. Suppose that at date to a poll is taken whlch records how long the persons who are unemployed at to have been out of work. In terms of the diagram, Person 1 has been out of work for a length of time TI, Person 2 for a length of time T2, Person 5 for a length of time T,, and Person 6 for a length of time T6. Persons 3 and 4 are not out of work, and therefore their unemployment durations are not recorded in the sample. An average computed from the durations out of work of those unemployed at time of interview would thus be Ths statistic T corresponds to the official statistics on mean duration of unemployment reported by the BLS. There is at least one sense in which this statistic is laclung. The times TI, T2, T,, and T6 do not report the completed length of the spells of persons 1, 2, 5, and 6, respectively, but only the length of their interrupted spell, whch is for each person an obviously shorter phenomenon. In terms of the diagram, the average completed length of unemployment spells of the currently unemployed is S is Salant's notation for completed length of spell. The subscripts EW stand for "experience-weighted" spell length, as shall be explained presently. Past F u t u r e Date of Interview Calendar TI me On the other hand, there is yet a third measure of the average length of unemployment. This measure consists of the average length of all spells of unemployment, where the spells are not defined to be those in progress at a given point in time, as in SEW, but are those spells which are observed to terminate over a given period of time. In such an average each spell counts exactly once, irrespective of its total contribution to unemployment. In terms of Figure 1 such an average would be taking into account the two repeat spells of persons 3 and 4. This statistic is represented by the symbol ST,, where TW mnemonically represents "termination-weighted." The time period over which these terminations have been averaged in the literature has commonly been the calendar year (see Hyman Kaitz and Salant). In contrast to ST,, whch weights all spells equally, the chances of sampling a given spell at a given point in time is proportional to its length. For this reason in steady state the average of completed spells at a given point in time (to for example) is equivalent to a
OL. 7I NO. 5 AKERLOF AND MAIN: EXPERIENCE-WEIGHTED MEASURES measure which weights spells according to tive jobs with each job lasting exactly one their contribution to total unemployment: year. The second person, however, is em this contribution is, of course, their com- ployed in the same job for the entire ten-year pleted length. It was for this reason that the period. At any moment of time a census of measure SEW=(S+S2+Ss +S6)/4was his population will find two persons em- named the experience-weighted spell length. ployed. One person will be in a one-year job the other will be in a ten-year job. The xplanations of Three Statistics average completed job t y Analog ently employed is, accordingly, five and one-half years. Furthermore, it should be An analogy is exact and also gives intui apparent, perhaps after a moment's reflec- tive explanation of the three statistics. Bar- tion, that, since in each and every year the ring the eat spells of average length of job in which that year's Figure I could be taken to represent not employment is spent is five and one-half length of time unemployed, but, instead, the years, so it is also true that over the entire life spans of persons over some period of period the average length of job in which time, with Person i having a life span of employment is spent is five and one-half length S, with life beginning and ending in years calendar time as indicated by the horizontal On the other hand, in the example there lines. The statistic T corresponds to the aver- are eleven spells of employment that ge age of the population; the statistic SEw terminate over the period and twenty em of the ployment years. Thus STh=20/11=1.8. The population alive at to, and Srw corresponds measure Sew weights the ten one-year jobs to the average life span of all persons who equally with the one ten-year job, according die over some period of time, or, equivalently to their respective contributions to employ in a steady state, is life expectancy at birth. ment. In contrast, Srw weights all eleven The latter statistic is smaller than the former spells equall because longer-lived persons are more apt to be seen in any given census; thus the person D. Interpretation of Data in Steady State who dies at eighty is visited by eight de- cennial censuses: the child who dies at ten is Censuses enumerate populations at given seen by only one decennial census. In de- moments of time. It is a central question in mography, life expectancy at birth(STw)is demography to use population censuses to dramatically different from the average life calculate mortality tables that show average expectancy of a population (SEw) where life expectancy at birth, or Srw. Similarly, there are high rates of child mortality. The the Bureau of Labor Statistics produces dramatic differences reported in the next sec- monthly data on the length of interrupted tion between SEw and STH for job tenures spells of unemployment and occasional ta and unemployment durations are the similar bles on the interrupted job tenure of workers result, caused by the existence of many short (see BLS, 1964, 1967, 1969, 1974). This paper job tenures and of many short spells of un- uses these census-like data to infer both the employment. average experience-weighted and the average termination-weighted unemployment dura C. A Numerical Example tions and job tenures A property of the stead A numerical example illustrates the rela- empirical estimates of Sew from reported tion between the two statistics Sew and Srw, statistics on interrupted spells. In the steady and how it may come about that Sew may be state a person who is interviewed at a ran long while Srw is short dom time will be interviewed with uniform Suppose that there are two persons who probability throughout the length of his spell are continuousl ly employed over a ten-year Thus for each person i, E(T)=S;/2, and period. The first is employed in ten consecu- with a large population SEw=2T. This fact
VOL. 71 NO. 5 AKERLOFAND MAIN: EXPERIE ZNCE- WEIGHTED MEASURES 1005 measure which weights spells according to their contribution to total unemployment; ths contribution is, of course, their completed length. It was for ths reason that the measure SEW= (S, + S, + S, + S6)/4 was named the experience-weighted spell length. B. Explanations of Three Statistics by Analogy An analogy is exact and also gives intuitive explanation of the three statistics. Barring the repeat spells of Persons 4 and 5, Figure 1 could be taken to represent not the length of time unemployed, but, instead, the life spans of persons over some period of time, with Person i having a life span of length S,, with life beginning and ending in calendar time as indicated by the horizontal lines. The statistic 7'corresponds to the average age of the population; the statistic SEW corresponds to the average life span of the population alive at to, and ST, corresponds to the average life span of all persons who die over some period of time, or, equivalently in a steady state, is life expectancy at birth. The latter statistic is smaller than the former because longer-lived persons are more apt to be seen in any given census; thus the person who dies at eighty is visited by eight decennial censuses; the child who dies at ten is seen by only one decennial census. In demography, life expectancy at birth (ST,) is dramatically different from the average life expectancy of a population (SEW)where there are high rates of child mortality. The dramatic differences reported in the next section between SEWand ST, for job tenures and unemployment durations are the similar result, caused by the existence of many short job tenures and of many short spells of unemployment. C. A Numerical Example A numerical example illustrates the relation between the two statistics SEWand ST,, and how it may come about that SEWmay be long whlle ST, is short. Suppose that there are two persons who are continuously employed over a ten-year period. The first is employed in ten consecutive jobs with each job lasting exactly one year. The second person, however, is employed in the same job for the entire ten-year period. At any moment of time a census of this population will find two persons employed. One person will be in a one-year job; the other will be in a ten-year job. The average completed job tenure of the currently employed is, accordingly, five and one-half years. Furthermore, it should be apparent, perhaps after a moment's reflection, that, since in each and every year the average length of job in which that year's employment is spent is five and one-half years, so it is also true that over the entire period the average length of job in which employment is spent is five and one-half years. On the other hand, in the example there are eleven spells of employment that terminate over the period and twenty employment years. Thus ST,= 20,' 1 1 - 1.8. The measure SEWweights the ten one-year jobs equally with the one ten-year job, according to their respective contributions to employment. In contrast, ST, weights all eleven spells equally. D. Interpretation of Data in Steady State Censuses enumerate populations at given moments of time. It is a central question in demography to use population censuses to calculate mortality tables that show average life expectancy at birth, or ST,. Similarly, the Bureau of Labor Statistics produces monthly data on the length of interrupted spells of unemployment and occasional tables on the interrupted job tenure of workers (see BLS, 1964, 1967, 1969, 1974). Ths paper uses these census-like data to infer both the average experience-weighted and the average termination-weighted unemployment durations and job tenures. A property of the steady state permits empirical estimates of SEW from reported statistics on interrupted spells. In the steady state a person who is interviewed at a random time will be interviewed with uniform probability throughout the length of his spell. Thus for each person I, E(T)=S,/2, and with a large population SEW= 2T. This fact
006 THEAMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW DECEMBER 1981 TABLE 1-ESTIMATED MEAN COMPLETED TENURE OF CURRENTLY HELD JOBS(IN YEARS)=SEw Male 1963 966 968 1973 19661968 73 A. By Race, Date, and Sex 11612. 11.6 24 28.2 290 928.623.323.0 11.0 195 13.7 Transport/public utilities 21.823422.8 15.113.3 Service/finance 18.6 18.8 17.1 17.0 Sales workers 124 18.2 6 14. Operatives and kindred 15.6 15.7 5.0 13.8 13.1 Farm laborers and foremen 23.6 Service workers l28128133 gives a simple way of estimating the Sew interrupted job tenure to give the statistic statistic, using the steady-state assumptio reported in Table 1 as SEw, or the estimated from the official BLS statistics on in- mean completed tenure of currently held jobs terrupted spells display markable stability for each subgroup over IL. Job Tenures and Longest time; this stability for four different times Job-Unemployment Durations not all at the same phase of the business cycle, gives some confidence in the use of the ng other things, displays steady-state assumption to calculate Srw and estimates of t statistics on job tenures SEw durations SEw and Sri Table 2 reports the estimates obtained for various populations. It shows that Sew is using the steady-state assumption for mean mpirically a uniformly large multiple of Stw completed job tenures in the 1968 to 1973 both for job tenures and for unemployment period and compare durations mated experience-weighted job tenures for 1968 as obtained in Table 1. These statistic A. Job Tenures support the major hypothesis of this v.9 that the average employment-year is spent The bureau of Labor Statistics has, on a job of long tenure even though the average occasion, compiled data on interrupted job length of all jobs is quite short. For white tenures. Table I displays the estimated mean males the estimated average completed length completed tenure of currently held jobs for a of job is four years; however, the average variety of demographic, occupational, and length of job of currently employed males is ndustrial subgroups. Assuming the steady state, we doubled an estimate of the mean ce our 1979 article
1006 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC RE VIEW DECEMBER 1981 Male Female 1963 1966 1968 1973 1963 1966 1968 1973 - - - - - - A. By Race, Date, and Sex White 17.4 18.2 18.3 17.2 11.6 Nonwhite B. By Industry, Date, and Sex Agriculture Mining Construction 14.2 24.5 19.4 10.5 14.1 28.2 18.5 11.0 14.4 29.0 20.7 12.3 14.2 30.6 19.7 11.9 11.0 22.9 - 10.0 Manufacturing-durable Manufacturing-nondurable Transport/public utilities Wholesale/retail Service/finance Public Administration 18.8 18.3 21.8 11.7 12.0 18.6 21.8 19.8 23.4 12.2 11.8 19.4 18.3 19.5 22.8 13.7 13.7 18.8 18.3 18.5 20.6 11.7 11.5 19.3 13.2 13.7 16.4 9.2 9.8 14.5 C. By Occupation, Date, and Sex Professional/technical Managers, proprietors Clerical and kindred 16.2 21.2 17.0 17.1 22.1 17.2 16.7 22.0 17.2 16.3 19.7 16.9 13.2 17.3 11.0 Sales workers 12.4 13.8 14.1 14.2 10.5 Craftsmen, foremen Operatives and kindred Nonfarm laborers 18.4 15.7 11.4 20.0 15.6 11.3 19.5 15.7 12.7 18.2 15.0 10.9 14.6 13.4 - Farm laborers and foremen 9.7 11.4 10.7 13.5 23.6 Service workers 12.8 12.8 13.3 11.6 8.4 Source: See text. gives a simple way of estimating the SEW interrupted job tenure to give the statistic statistic, using the steady-state assumption, reported in Table 1 as SEW,or the estimated from the official BLS statistics on in- mean completed tenure of currently held jobs. terrupted spells. The estimates were found to display a remarkable stability for each subgroup over 11. Job Tenures and Longest time; this stability for four different times, Job-Unemployment Durations not all at the same phase of the business cycle, gives some confidence in the use of the This section, among other things, displays steady-state assumption to calculate ST, and " estimates of the two statistics on job tenures >EWand unemployment durations SEWand ST,, Table 2 reports the estimates obtained for various populations. It shows that SEWis using the steahy-state assumption for mean empirically a uniformly large multiple of ST, completed job tenures in the 1968 to 1973 both for job tenures and for unemployment period and compares them with the estidurations. mated experience-weighted job tenures for 1968 as obtained in Table 1.' These statistics A. Job Tenures support the major hypothesis of this paper: that the average employment-year is spent in The Bureau of Labor Statistics has, on a job of long tenure even though the average occasion, compiled data on interrupted job length of all jobs is quite short. For white tenures. Table 1 displays the estimated mean males the estimated average completed length completed tenure of currently held jobs for a of job is four years; however, the average variety of demographic, occupational, and length of job of currently employed males is industrial subgroups. Assuming the steady state, we doubled an estimate of the mean 'See our 1979 article
VOL, 7I NO. 5 AKERLOF AND MAIN: EXPERIENCE WEIGHTED MEASURES 007 TABLE 2-EsTIMATED MEAN COMPLETED TENURE (IN Y EARS)OF JOBS HELD IN JANUARY 1968=SEw ESTIMATED MEAN COMPLETED TENURE (IN YEARS)OF J JANUARY 1968 AND JANUARY 1973=STW; AND THE RATIO OF SEW/STW ST SEw/S STW SEw/ A. By Race and Sex 3.9 B. By Industry and Sex 3.6 8.1 3.8 endurable 4.2 44 Transport/public utilities holesale/retail 4 Service/finance 18.8 C. By Occupation and Sex 4.7 2.4 Craftsmen and foremen 4.6 Operatives and kindred Farm laborers and foremen Source: Calculations described in the text over eighteen years. For white females the than the STh statistic and, as a rule of thumb. comparable statistics are three and twelve the longer statistic is a multiple three to five years, respectively times the shorter statistic for the same popl Relative to the new view of employment, lation subgroup. which sees jobs as being of short duration, the eighteen years for male employees and B. Longest Job the twelve years for female emplo cteady-state The statistics on job tenures strongly sug- ees is quite assumption is violated due to growth of the gest that most adult males do have a"nor- labor force, this tends to bias the estimated mal job which they maintain for a good average downwards, since persons with long portion of their adult lives. There is one employment began their jobs long ago and corroborating piece of evidence. In 1966 therefore their fraction, as reported in the Parnes'National Longitudinal Survey asked BLS table of interrupted durations, is less older men 45 to 59(i. e, with average age 52 than would occur in a steady state without about their longest job. As can be seen in employment growth.(A calculation reported Table 3, the average length of longest job Isewhere crudely estimates the underreport- was seventeen years. This estimate must be ng bias as 7 percent for women and 4 per- taken as a lower bound since the youngest of cent for men.) these men were still twenty years from retire Table 2, Panels A and B, report the com- ment age and almost two-thirds reported that parable statistics for employment by occupa. they were currently in their longest job. This tion and industry. It should again be noted large that the Sew statistic is considerably longer the em action is by itself another indicator of ployment stability of most of the adult
VOL. 71 NO. 5 A KERLOF AND MAIN: EXPERIENCE- WEIGHTED MEASURES 1007 Male w -~ A. By Race and Sex White 18.3 3.9 Nonwhite 14.4 2.8 B. By Industry and Sex Agriculture 29.0 3.6 Mining 20.7 4.8 Construction 12.3 2.4 Manufacturing-durable 18.3 4.3 Manufacturing-nondurable 19.5 4.2 Transport/public utilities 22.8 5.8 Wholesale/retail 13.7 2.6 Service/finance 13.7 3.0 Public administration 18.8 5.7 C. By Occupation and Sex Professional/ technical 16.7 4.0 Managers, proprietors 22.0 7.3 Clerical and kindred 17.2 3.6 Sales workers 14.1 3.0 Craftsmen and foremen 19.5 4.5 Operatives and kindred 15.7 3.0 Nonfarm laborers 12.7 2.4 Farm laborers and foremen 10.7 1.6 Service workers 13.3 2.8 Source: Calculations described in the text. over eighteen years. For whte females the comparable statistics are three and twelve years, respectively. Relative to the new view of employment, whch sees jobs as being of short duration, the eighteen years for male employees and the twelve years for female employees is quite long. Furthermore, although the steady-state assumption is violated due to growth of the labor force, this tends to bias the estimated average downwards, since persons with long employment began their jobs long ago and therefore their fraction, as reported in the BLS table of interrupted durations, is less than would occur in a steady state without employment growth. (A calculation reported elsewhere crudely estimates the underreporting bias as 7 percent for women and 4 percent for men.) Table 2, Panels A and B, report the comparable statistics for employment by occupation and industry. It should again be noted that the SEWstatistic is considerably longer Female SE ,/ST w S~w S E,/ST w 4.7 11.6 2.6 4.5 5.1 10.3 2.2 4.7 8.1 23.3 3.8 6.1 4.3 - - - 5.1 9.4 2.5 3.8 4.3 12.2 3.1 3.9 4.6 14.0 3.2 4.4 3.9 15.1 3.6 4.2 5.3 9.1 2.1 4.3 4.6 9.9 2.2 4.5 3.3 12.7 3.4 3.7 4.2 13.1 2.7 4.9 3.0 18.1 5.8 3.1 4.8 10.6 2.6 4.1 4.7 10.2 2.4 4.3 4.3 16.8 4.6 3.7 5.2 12.7 2.8 4.5 5.3 14.1 2.7 5.2 6.7 24.0 4.0 6.0 4.8 8.7 1.9 4.6 than the ST, statistic and, as a rule of thumb, the longer statistic is a multiple three to five times the shorter statistic for the same population subgroup. B. Longest Job The statistics on job tenures strongly suggest that most adult males do have a "normal" job whlch they maintain for a good portion of their adult lives. There is one corroborating piece of evidence. In 1966 Parnes' National Longitudinal Survey asked older men 45 to 59 (i.e., with average age 52) about their longest job. As can be seen in Table 3, the average length of longest job was seventeen years. This estimate must be taken as a lower bound since the youngest of these men were still twenty years from retirement age and almost two-thirds reported that they were currently in their longest job. This large fraction is by itself another indicator of the employment stability of most of the adult
008 THEAMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEw DECEMBER 1981 TABLE 3--AVERAGE LENGTH(IN YEARS)OF LONGEST sumption and doubling the mean interrupted JOB BY AGE AND RACE FOR OLDER MALE ORKERS(45-59)IN19662 pell length T as reported by the bls. It should be noted that for almost all years Black from 1948 to 1978 the ratio of the two statis- ticS Sew to Srw was between three and five 13.4 Table 4 thus demonstrates what appears to 14.2 tion of all spells of unemployment or a dura- subgroup of the U.s. population which 17.3 17.6 16.8 terminate over the course of a year, STw, is much shorter than the average duration of ne completed spells of those unemployed any moment in til d as a rule of 19.2 174 thumb, the latter statistic is a multiple 56 tween three and five of the former statistic While the average duration of all unemploy ment spells of the total U.S. population was 21.5 16.l approximately six weeks, the average dura tion of completed spell of those unemployed 48 (3397) (1343) at each moment of time for the United States From Parnes'National Longitudinal Study over the postwar period was approximately six months. The computations made calculate Table 4. of course use the stead state assumption. The sensitivity of our male labor force. Finally, we might mention estimates to these assumptions has been ex- that almost 8 percent of the sample of these amined elsewhere with results generally older men still found themselves in 1966 in favorable to the use of these assumptions their first job after school (see our 1979 article) C. Unemployment Durations Il. Conclusion Table 4 presents estimates of the two sta This paper has presented and shown em tistics Sth and Sew in columns 1 and 2, pirical estimates of a measure of Sew of the respectively. Column I is the estimated aver- average length of a spell in which an employ age length of all spells of unemployment ment-year and an unemployment-week is ending over a span of time, by for the spent. According to estimates in the preced years 1948-78 for the U.S. population. Col- ing sections experience-weighted means of umn 2 gives estimated average lengths of job tenures and unemployment durations are completed spell of persons unemployed at a as an empirical regularity, all longer by large given time for the same years, 1948-78, or, multiples(for example, roughly three to five) equivalently, the averach an unemployment- spells of unemployment ge duration than the mean length of all jobs and al ployment spell while the average job may be quite short For the years 1966 to 1978, STw because there are many short jobs, most em calculated by the method of salant ployment experience is spent in jobs that are method maximizes the likelihood of the uite long. This is somewhat contrary to the observed breakdown of the observed popula- popularized view of the U.S. labor market as tion into different categories given that inter- one where everyone is on the brink of chang rupted spells are distributed as a beta distri ced ng jobs. If an"I quit"was induce at each bution. Earlier estimates of escape rates are opportunity of a job paying a few dollars obtained from Kaitz. Estimates of Sew are more; or a"you're fired"was forthcoming at obtained by employing the steady-state as- every deviation from required productivity
1008 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW DECEMBER 1981 Age All Whlte Black "From Parnes' National Longitudinal Study. male labor force. Finally, we might mention that almost 8 percent of the sample of these older men still found themselves in 1966 in their first job after school. C. Unemployment Durations Table 4 presents estimates of the two statistics ST, and SEWin columns 1 and 2, respectively. Column 1 is the estimated average length of all spells of unemployment ending over a span of time, by year, for the years 1948-78 for the U.S. population. Column 2 gives estimated average lengths of completed spell of persons unemployed at a given time for the same years, 1948-78, or, equivalently, the average duration of unemployment spell in which an unemploymentweek occurs. For the years 1966 to 1978, ST, was calculated by the method of Salant. His method maximizes the likelihood of the observed breakdown of the observed population into different categories given that interrupted spells are distributed as a beta distribution. Earlier estimates of escape rates are obtained from Kaitz. Estimates of SEWare obtained by employing the steady-state assumption and doubling the mean interrupted spell length T as reported by the BLS. It should be noted that for almost all years from 1948 to 1978 the ratio of the two statistics SEW to ST, was between three and five. Table 4 thus demonstrates what appears to be an empirical regularity: the average duration of all spells of unemployment of a given subgroup of the U.S. population which terminate over the course of a year, ST,, is much shorter than the average duration of the completed spells of those unemployed at any moment in time, SEW; and, as a rule of thumb, the latter statistic is a multiple between three and five of the former statistic. While the average duration of all unemployment spells of the total U.S. population was approximately six weeks, the average duration of completed spell of those unemployed at each moment of time for the United States over the postwar period was approximately six months. The computations made to calculate Table 4, of course, use the steadystate assumption. The sensitivity of our estimates to these assumptions has been examined elsewhere with results generally favorable to the use of these assumptions (see our 1979 article). 111. Conclusion This paper has presented and shown empirical estimates of a measure of SEWof the average length of a spell in whlch an employment-year and an unemployment-week is spent. According to estimates in the preceding sections experience-weighted means of job tenures and unemployment durations are, as an empirical regularity, all longer by large multiples (for example, roughly three to five) than the mean length of all jobs and all spells of unemployment. While the average job may be quite short because there are many short jobs, most employment experience is spent in jobs that are quite long. This is somewhat contrary to the popularized view of the U.S. labor market as one where everyone is on the brink of changing jobs. If an "I quit" was induced at each opportunity of a job paying a few dollars more; or a "you're fired" was forthcoming at every deviation from required productivity
VOL 7I NO. 5 AKERLOFAND MAIN: EXPERIENCE-WEIGHTED MEASURES TABLE 4-WEIGHTED AND UNWEIGHTED UNEMPLOYMENT DURATIONS Average Duration(in Estimate of Weighted Weeks)of Completed Average Duration of Spells of Unemploy. Completed Spell ment Unweighted of Unemployment Unemployment SEW/STW 7 195 4407 6060 1959 2072 655757 280 1964 58 3314450 4.6 15.8 820610 dSource: Kaitz and our 1980 article dOuble the average durations of unemployment durations of unemployed persons currently employed males would hardly be limited If, on the other hand, jobs currently expected to average an eighteen-year job in progress are expected to last an average of tenure in their current jobs! This popular eighteen years, there seems to be consider view that jobs are quite short is, however, a able scope for the existence of internal labor statistical artifact based on an erroneous in- markets and for the pay of most, althoug terpretation of turnover statistics. while there certainly not all, to diverge from their respec may be less permanence than in previous tive marginal products. The experience- times, it remains that the average male is in a weighted spell length SEr seems to shed light job of quite long standing. There exists a on possible imperfections in the labor market derable degree of ermanence in One other practical and immediate exam labor market ple can be given of the explanatory power of If a monthly turnover rate of around 2.8 experience-weighted job durations. The crisis percent is taken to imply that all jobs last at Chrysler can be viewed as the traumatic three years, then the opportunities for pay to termination of many thousands of jobs diverge from marginal product must be Turnover statistics for the automobile in-
VOL. 71 NO. 5 A KERLOFAND MAIN: EXPERIENCE- WEIGHTED MEASURES TABLE4-WEIGHTED AND UNWEIGHTED UNEMPLOYMENT DURATIONS Average Duration (in Estimate of Weighted Weeks) of Completed Average Duration of Spells of Unemploy- Completed Spells ment Unweighteda of unemploymentb unemployment S~~ SEw Rate 1948 4.6 17.2 3.8 1949 6.2 20.0 5.9 1950 6.7 24.2 5.3 1951 4.1 19.4 3.3 1952 4.0 16.8 3.0 1953 3.7 16.0 2.9 1954 6.4 23.6 5.5 1955 5.4 26.0 4.4 1956 5.0 22.6 4.1 1957 5.7 21.0 4.3 1958 7.4 27.8 6.8 1959 6.2 28.8 5.5 1960 6.0 25.6 5.5 1961 7.2 31.2 6.7 1962 6.2 29.4 5.5 1963 6.4 28.0 5.7 1964 5.8 26.6 5.2 1965 5.2 23.6 4.5 1966 4.2 20.8 3.8 1967 5.0 17.6 3.8 1968 4.5 16.8 3.6 1969 4.6 15.8 3.5 1970 5.4 17.4 4.9 1971 6.8 22.6 5.9 1972 6.2 24.0 5.6 1973 7.0 20.0 4.9 1974 5.6 19.4 5.6 1975 9.1 28.2 8.5 1976 8.0 31.6 7.7 1977 7.2 28.6 7.0 1978 6.3 26.2 6.0 'Source: Kaitz and our 1980 article. b~oublethe average durations of unemployment durations of unemployed persons. currently employed males would hardly be limited. If, on the other hand, jobs currently expected to average an eighteen-year job in progress are expected to last an average of tenure in their current jobs! This popular eighteen years, there seems to be considerview that jobs are quite short is, however, a able scope for the existence of internal labor statistical artifact based on an erroneous in- markets and for the pay of most, although terpretation of turnover statistics. While there certainly not all, to diverge from their respecmay be less permanence than in previous tive marginal products. The experiencetimes, it remains that the average male is in a weighted spell length SEWseems to shed light job of quite long standing. There exists a on possible imperfections in the labor market. considerable degree of permanence in the One other practical and immediate examlabor market. ple can be given of the explanatory power of If a monthly turnover rate of around 2.8 experience-weighted job durations. The crisis percent is taken to imply that all jobs last at Chrysler can be viewed as the traumatic three years, then the opportunities for pay to termination of many thousands of jobs. diverge from marginal product must be Turnover statistics for the automobile in-
1010 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVTEW DECEMBER 1981 dustry indicate that jobs last on average three termination-weighted average spell lengths years. The male jobs being terminated at STh has been explained. The respective views Chrysler, however, if they are of the same ne U.S. labor market provided by these length as in the rest of manufacturing in- two types of measure are remarkably differ dustry, have an expected tenure of around ent. From a policy viewpoint it seems im twenty years. This is altogether a more seri- portant to emphasize that examination of turnover in labor market states can lead to a On the subject of unemployment, it is mistaken short view of the labor market apparent that while the average unemploy- stemming from estimates of low STH, while ment spell may be quite short because there examination of labor market participants are many short spells of unemployment, most leads, in fact, to a long view of the labor unemployment experience is spent in spells market through remarkably high values of that are quite long. For the application of SEw economic theory to the problems of unem- ployment, the less misleading statistic to our mind is not the length of the average spell of REFERENCES unemployment but, rather, the average length of spell in which time unemployed is spent. G. A. Akerlof and B. G M. Main, "Unemploy The existence of many short spells is of little ment Spells and Employment Durations consequence if the very shortness of these Are They Long? Are They Short? or Are ns that they do not contribute They Both?, processed, Inst. Bus. Econ much to total unemployment. The measure Res, Univ. California-Berkeley, 1979 Sew with respect to unemployment shows Unemployment Spells that most time spent unemployed is in spells and Unemployment Experience, "Amer hat are quite long Econ.ReU,Dec.1980,70,885-93. This observation on unemployment is not K B. Clark and L H Summers, "Labor Force new, and has been made most forcibly by Transitions and Unemployment, Nat Clark and Summers(1979)who effectively working pape derive a Gini coefficient for the distribution bridge, Mass, Aug. 1978 of unemployment. Our measure Sew lacks ,“ Labor Market Dy the sophistication of the Clark and Summers namics and Unemployment: A Reconsid ch and must be viewed as an easily eration,” Brook gs Papers, washington derived summary measure. Examination of 1979,1,13-72. Table 4 indicates that in the late 1970,'s the M. S. Feldstein, Lowering the Permanent Rate typical week of unemployment was spent in of Unemployment, U.S. Congress, Joint a length in excess of six months. This result Economic Committee, Washington: U.S can only add weight to Clark and Summers Government Printing Office, 1973 rejection of both search theory and thethe- R. E. Hall, " turnover in the labor Force, of contracts ns of must clearly be aimed at "the unemployed, unemployment. Remedies for unemploym 709-56 H Kaitz,"Analyzing the Length of Spells of rather than at making the labor market more Unemployment, Monthly Labor Rev efficient In summary, the use of estimates of the H S Parnes, et al, The Pre-Retirement Years: perience-weighted spell length Sew that A Longitudinal Study of the Labor Marker were easily derived from the observed in Experience of Men, Vol. 1, U.S. Depart terrupted spell lengths T of stocks of both ment of Labor, Manpower, Research he employed and the unemployed, has led Monograph No. 15, Washington: U.S. to a view of the U.S. labor market that is Government Printing Office, 1968 distinctly stock-oriented or "long. The G. Perry, "Unemployment Flows in the U.S fusion created by the use of Labor Market, Brookings Papers, Wash turnover statistics or their equivalent ngton1972,2,245-92
1010 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW DECEMBER 1981 dustry indicate that jobs last on average three years. The male jobs being terminated at Chrysler, however, if they are of the same length as in the rest of manufacturing industry, have an expected tenure of around twenty years. This is altogether a more serious situation. On the subject of unemployment, it is apparent that whlle the average unemployment spell may be quite short because there are many short spells of unemployment, most unemployment experience is spent in spells that are quite long. For the application of economic theory to the problems of unemployment, the less misleading statistic to our mind is not the length of the average spell of unemployment but, rather, the average length of spell in which time unemployed is spent. The existence of many short spells is of little consequence if the very shortness of these spells means that they do not contribute much to total unemployment. The measure SEWwith respect to unemployment shows that most time spent unemployed is in spells that are quite long. This observation on unemployment is not new, and has been made most forcibly by Clark and Summers (1979) who effectively derive a Gini coefficient for the distribution of unemployment. Our measure SEWlacks the sophistication of the Clark and Summers' approach, and must be viewed as an easily derived summary measure. Examination of Table 4 indicates that in the late 1970's the typical week of unemployment was spent in a length in excess of six months. This result can only add weight to Clark and Summers' rejection of both search theory and the theory of contracts as plausible explanations of unemployment. Remedies for unemployment must clearly be aimed at "the unemployed" rather than at making the labor market more efficient. In summary, the use of estimates of the experience-weighted spell length SEW that were easily derived from the observed interrupted spell lengths T of stocks of both the employed and the unemployed, has led to a view of the U.S. labor market that is distinctly stock-oriented or "long." The source of confusion created by the use of turnover statistics or their equivalent, termination-weighted average spell lengths ST, has been explained. The respective views of the U.S. labor market provided by these two types of measure are remarkably different. From a policy viewpoint it seems important to emphasize that examination of turnover in labor market states can lead to a mistaken short view of the labor market stemming from estimates of low ST,; while examination of labor market participants leads, in fact, to a long view of the labor market through remarkably high values of REFERENCES G. A. Akerlof and B. G. M. Main, "Unemployment Spells and Employment DurationsAre They Long? Are They Short? or Are They Both?," processed, Inst. Bus. Econ. Res., Univ. California-Berkeley, 1979. and -, "Unemployment Spells and Unemployment Experience," Amer. Econ. Rev., Dec. 1980, 70, 885-93. K. B. Clark and L. H. Summers, "Labor Force Transitions and Unemployment," Nat. Bur. Econ. Res. worlung paper, Cambridge, Mass., Aug. 1978. -and P, "Labor Market Dynamics and Unemployment: A Reconsideration," Brookings Papers, Washlngton 1979, 1, 13-72. M. S. Fetdstein, Lowering the Permanent Rate of Unemployment, U.S. Congress, Joint Economic Committee, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973. R. E. Hall, "Turnover in the Labor Force," Brookings Papers, Washington 1972, 3, 709-56. H. Kaitz, "Analyzing the Length of Spells of Unemployment," Monthly Labor Rev., Nov. 1970, 15, 11-20. H. S. Parnes, et al., The Pre-Retirement Years: A Longitudinal Study of the Labor Market Experience of Men, Vol. 1, U.S. Department of Labor, Manpower, Research Monograph No. 15, Washlngton: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968. G. Peny, "Unemployment Flows in the U.S. Labor Market," Brookings Papers, Washington 1972, 2, 245-92
VOL 7I NO A AND MAIN: EXPERIENCE-WEIGHTED MEASURES S Salant, "Search Theory and Duration Data Washington: U.S. Government Printing A Theory of Sorts, " Quart. J. Econ., Feb Office. 1967. Special Labor Force Report 112: Job U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Sta- Tenure of workers, January 1968 tistics, Special Labor Force Report 36: Job Washington: U.S. Government Printing nure 0 Workers, January 1963, Office. 1968 Washington: U.S. Government Printing Special Labor Force 172:J0b Office, 1964 Tenure of workers, January 1973 Special Labor Force Report 77: Job Washington: U.S. Government Printing Tenure of workers, January 1966 Office. 1974
VOL. 71 NO. 5 AKERLOF AND MAIN: EXPERIENCE- WEIGHTED MEASURES 1011 S. Salant, "Search Theory and Duration Data: A Theory of Sorts," Quart. J. Econ., Feb. 1977, 91, 39-57. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Special Labor Force Report 36: Job Tenure of Workers, January 1963, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1964. , Special Labor Force Report 77: Job Tenure of Workers, January 1966, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967. ,Special Labor Force Report 112: Job Tenure of Workers, January 1968, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1968. ,Special Labor Force Report 172: Job Tenure of Workers, January 1973, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974