当前位置:高等教育资讯网  >  中国高校课件下载中心  >  大学文库  >  浏览文档

斯坦福卫生经济学教材(Health Economics)杰伊·巴塔查里亚《健康经济学》课程教学资源(试卷习题,英文版)课后判断题及答案 Ch 2 Demand for Health Care

资源类别:文库,文档格式:PDF,文档页数:3,文件大小:105.9KB,团购合买
点击下载完整版文档(PDF)

Demand for Health Care Comprehension Questions Indicate whether the statement is true or false,and justify your answer.Be sure to cite evidence from the chapter and state any additional assumptions you may need. 1.Unlike with most types of goods,deriving a demand curve for health care is quite simple because people rarely skimp on health care. FALSE.Just as with any good,deriving a demand curve for health care is dif- ficult because it requires information about how the same population would react to different prices.This requires either parallel universes or,more real- istically,a randomized experiment. 2.The RAND study was especially useful for measuring price elasticities be- cause it randomly assigned insurance plans to participants(as opposed to letting them choose). TRUE.Randomization ensured that the groups facing different prices were statistically equivalent.That meant that any difference in demand between groups was attributable to price,not some other characteristic. 3.The Oregon Medicaid Experiment is not truly"randomized"because lottery winners did not all end up with insurance,and some lottery losers did end up with insurance. FALSE.Although the Oregon Medicaid Experiment was not exactly a con

2 Demand for Health Care Comprehension Questions Indicate whether the statement is true or false, and justify your answer. Be sure to cite evidence from the chapter and state any additional assumptions you may need. 1. Unlike with most types of goods, deriving a demand curve for health care is quite simple because people rarely skimp on health care. FALSE. Just as with any good, deriving a demand curve for health care is dif- ficult because it requires information about how the same population would react to different prices. This requires either parallel universes or, more real￾istically, a randomized experiment. 2. The RAND study was especially useful for measuring price elasticities be￾cause it randomly assigned insurance plans to participants (as opposed to letting them choose). TRUE. Randomization ensured that the groups facing different prices were statistically equivalent. That meant that any difference in demand between groups was attributable to price, not some other characteristic. 3. The Oregon Medicaid Experiment is not truly “randomized” because lottery winners did not all end up with insurance, and some lottery losers did end up with insurance. FALSE. Although the Oregon Medicaid Experiment was not exactly a con- 1

2 Health Economics Answer Key trolled experiment,it did use randomization to assign participants to differ- ent groups,and one group(the "lottery winners")were much more likely to obtain health insurance. 4.The RAND HIE found that people assigned to the free health plan had the same rate of hospitalization as people assigned to the cost-sharing plans. FALSE.The people assigned to the free plan visited the hospital more fre. quently and were more likely to visit the ER. 5.In the RAND HIE,the arc elasticity of demand for inpatient care was larger (in absolute value)than the arc elasticity of demand for outpatient care. FALSE.That result would im nply that peop ire mo price sensitive when health care.Instead,the arc elasticity of demand for 6.Unlike the usual measure of elasticity,an arc elasticity can be calculated from just one price-quantity data point. FALSE.Any measure of elasticity requires data from at least two price levels in order to measure responsiveness to price. 7.Both the RAND and Or studies find that demand for health care is ap- proximately unit elastic,that is,e-1 FALSE.The RAND HIE finds that demand for health care is very inelastic, with arc elasticities around 0.2. 8.In the RAND HIE,being ass gned more generous insurance did not gener- ally improve participants'health outcomes,except among certain subgroups TRUE.The RAND HIE finds that generous insurance only provided small health improvements to healthy people.However,high-risk participants (like those who were smokers or had high blood pressure)did receive sub- stantial health benefits from more generous ins 9.To date,no major health insurance experiment has studied the impact of uninsurance,just different levels of insurance. FALSE.The Oregon Medicaid Experiment studied the impact of uninsur- ance 10.Results from the Oregon Medicaid Experiment suggest that having health in- surance has a positive impact on health status. Bhattacharya,Hyde Tu 2013 2

2 | Health Economics Answer Key trolled experiment, it did use randomization to assign participants to differ￾ent groups, and one group (the “lottery winners”) were much more likely to obtain health insurance. 4. The RAND HIE found that people assigned to the free health plan had the same rate of hospitalization as people assigned to the cost-sharing plans. FALSE. The people assigned to the free plan visited the hospital more fre￾quently and were more likely to visit the ER. 5. In the RAND HIE, the arc elasticity of demand for inpatient care was larger (in absolute value) than the arc elasticity of demand for outpatient care. FALSE. That result would imply that people are more price sensitive when it comes to more urgent health care. Instead, the arc elasticity of demand for impatient care was smaller in absolute value. 6. Unlike the usual measure of elasticity, an arc elasticity can be calculated from just one price-quantity data point. FALSE. Any measure of elasticity requires data from at least two price levels in order to measure responsiveness to price. 7. Both the RAND and Oregon studies find that demand for health care is ap￾proximately unit elastic, that is, ✏ ⇡ ￾1. FALSE. The RAND HIE finds that demand for health care is very inelastic, with arc elasticities around 0.2. 8. In the RAND HIE, being assigned more generous insurance did not gener￾ally improve participants’ health outcomes, except among certain subgroups. TRUE. The RAND HIE finds that generous insurance only provided small health improvements to healthy people. However, high-risk participants (like those who were smokers or had high blood pressure) did receive sub￾stantial health benefits from more generous insurance. 9. To date, no major health insurance experiment has studied the impact of uninsurance, just different levels of insurance. FALSE. The Oregon Medicaid Experiment studied the impact of uninsur￾ance. 10. Results from the Oregon Medicaid Experiment suggest that having health in￾surance has a positive impact on health status. ￾c Bhattacharya, Hyde & Tu 2013 2

Chapter 2 Demand for Health Care 3 TRUE.Lottery winners in the Oregon Medicaid Experiment were not more likely to survive n lottery losers,but they had better self-reported physical health and mental health 3 Bhattacharya,Hyde &Tu013

Chapter 2| Demand for Health Care | 3 TRUE. Lottery winners in the Oregon Medicaid Experiment were not more likely to survive than lottery losers, but they had better self-reported physical health and mental health. 3 ￾c Bhattacharya, Hyde & Tu 2013

点击下载完整版文档(PDF)VIP每日下载上限内不扣除下载券和下载次数;
按次数下载不扣除下载券;
24小时内重复下载只扣除一次;
顺序:VIP每日次数-->可用次数-->下载券;
已到末页,全文结束
相关文档

关于我们|帮助中心|下载说明|相关软件|意见反馈|联系我们

Copyright © 2008-现在 cucdc.com 高等教育资讯网 版权所有