tio697-0o ORIGINALARBEITEN.ORIGINALS Johan Sjodin·Erik Serrano·Bertil Enquist Contact-free measurements and numerical analyses of the strain distribution in the joint area of steel-to-timber dowel joints the joint area was studied ment s deutung hat. The casuremet sytem a Die numerischen Ergebnisse fuhrten zusammen mit den be- Ito be a le com eilangimVetndnestcrcichfestgecl,Darberhinasfand particularly useful for studying the man heraus,dass S nungen und Zugdehnungen paral tat is of special importance Several observations of considerable interest were made on stimmung mit fruheren Untersuchungen festgestellt.dass bei den the of numerical results in nation with results c groBeren V bindungen ein Sprodbruch auftra tion in the joint area was detected.for example.and shear srains to the grain 1 Introduction ence the failure mode of the ioint. onmade The design rules contained in the european timber code Ecs (Eurocode 52004)for multiple dowel-type joints loaded parallel 99)which ing th y (Joh an lyse der he vels.Restrictions related to spacing.end and edge di es and e m tet.Die Dehnungsverteilung im Bereich der Verbindung wurde untersuch ateengdirectedinrec stigations Messsvstem erwies sich als wertvolle u herkomm rience of craftsmen and the results of joint tests conducted in yed in nissen von Parameter- the laboratory.Theoretical meth 1998, ·B.E tresses perpendicular to the grain as well as shear stre el-type Brittle dowel-type joints(orbol in the literature:see eg the and()The ilure of a large glulam structure Thi tle(R ivctra Mecaics Lund Univriy Lund Sweden of the behavior of multiple dowel-type jonts
DOI 10.1007/s00107-006-0112-1 ORIGINALARBEITEN · ORIGINALS Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff (2006) 64: 497–506 Johan Sjodin · Erik Serrano · Bertil Enquist ¨ Contact-free measurements and numerical analyses of the strain distribution in the joint area of steel-to-timber dowel joints Published online: 12 April 2006 © Springer-Verlag 2006 Abstract Two different dowel-type joints of differing size were loaded in tension parallel to the grain. The strain distribution in the joint area was studied using a contact-free measurement system. The results were compared with those of numerical analysis. The measurement system was found to be a valuable complement to traditional measurement techniques and also to numerical analyses performed in parametric studies. The measurements obtained were shown to be particularly useful for studying the highly nonlinear behavior of timber that is of special importance in characterizing timber dowel joints. Several observations of considerable interest were made on the basis of numerical results in combination with results of the contact-free measurement system. A non-uniform strain distribution in the joint area was detected, for example, and shear strains and tensile strains, both parallel and perpendicular to the grain were found to be concentrated in the areas most likely to influence the failure mode of the joint. A general observation made was that the larger size joint failed in brittle manner, an observation supported by previous research. Beruhrungslose Messung und numerische Analyse der ¨ Dehnungsverteilung in Stahl-Holz-Stabdubelverbindungen ¨ Zusammenfassung Zwei verschiedene Stabdübelverbindungen unterschiedlicher Größe wurden auf Zug in Faserrichtung belastet. Die Dehnungsverteilung im Bereich der Verbindung wurde mittels eines berührungslosen Messsystems untersucht und mit den Ergebnissen aus einer numerischen Analyse verglichen. Das Messsystem erwies sich als wertvolle Ergänzung zu herkömmlichen Messtechniken sowie zu den Ergebnissen von Parameterstudien. Die Messungen erwiesen sich als besonders hilfreich zur J. Sjödin (✉) · B. Enquist School of Technology and Design, Växjö University, Lückligs plats 1, 351 95, Växjö, Sweden E-mail: johan.sjodin@vxu.se E. Serrano SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute, Borås, Sweden E. Serrano Division of Structural Mechanics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Untersuchung des stark nicht-linearen Verhaltens von Holz, das für die Charakterisierung von Holzdübelverbindungen große Bedeutung hat. Die numerischen Ergebnisse führten zusammen mit den berührungslosen Messungen zu einigen interessanten Erkenntnissen. So wurde zum Beispiel eine ungleichmäßige Dehnungsverteilung im Verbindungsbereich festgestellt. Darüber hinaus fand man heraus, dass Schubdehnungen und Zugdehnungen parallel und senkrecht zur Faser konzentriert in den für den Bruch maßgebenden Bereichen vorkamen. Generell wurde in Übereinstimmung mit früheren Untersuchungen festgestellt, dass bei den größeren Verbindungen ein Sprödbruch auftrat. 1 Introduction The design rules contained in the European timber code EC5 (Eurocode 5 2004) for multiple dowel-type joints loaded parallel to the grain are based on the Johansen yielding theory (Johansen 1949), which assumes a rigid plastic behavior of the timber and the dowels. Restrictions related to spacing, end and edge distances and timber thickness are also included in EC5 in order to help avoid brittle failure modes. In addition, the current version of EC5 contains informative design rules aimed at reducing occurrence of the block-shear/plug-shear failure mode at which attention has been directed in recent investigations. According to Schmid et al. (2002), most timber design codes are based on the experience of craftsmen and the results of joint tests conducted in the laboratory. Theoretical methods that have been employed in this area include the approach of Jorissen (1998), which is based on the theory of beams on an elastic foundation, for analyzing stresses perpendicular to the grain as well as shear stresses in dowel-type joints. Brittle failures in dowel-type joints (or bolted joints) in contradiction to what design codes predict are reported in the literature; see e.g. the experimental results of Quenneville and Mohammad (2000). The failure of a large glulam structure was described as being brittle (Ranta-Maunus and Kevarinmäki 2003). This exemplifies the need for more adequate knowledge of the behavior of multiple dowel-type joints
498 2 Experimental 2.1 Specimens studies of joints to gather data other fjont' The two types of joints used in this study are shown in Fig.1. ploy in order to fill this gap.Some studies in which measur this type have been oints glulam beams manufactured by Moelven Tore boda Limr AB (L40 quality according to Swedish regulations method,comparing the results with those OClAecsaneash A ts of nd65%TeihaehmidyRH)ntl12%moistueegiim results were limited to the area close to the bolt.In order to (.6%)was reached,prior to further preparatior dicular to ntact-fre s the minimum for type fo 27 of dete dowels were 12mm in diameter with a tolerance of 0.2 mm ations and strains within largc arcas.and of maintaining 3 a high level of accuracy and spatial resolution in a large number from the loading machine.In systems of this sort,which in 2.2Test setup onare,strong ve been directed at making In the present paner one such mmercial contact-free mea oints onected to the loading system by a fork co ection. surement system is used for studying the joint area in two types Fig.2.For type I joints,the other end was first reinforced P sed forh o illustrate the advantage and the po ssibilities of such a mea mens were inserted about Im into the grip of the testing ystm.which ma hinc..the joints esults with those of ment methods and also to a displ ent-control rate of 0.5 mm/min for e 1 an with those of numerical analysis. 09mm/n for ypen Falrlah 15 mm 8网 45mm1■ mm ● 2 600 mm 1 x 70mm1 ↓8mm 12mm ahc1。 252m 2000mm
498 There is a gap between investigations involving experiments and those based on a theoretical approach. Despite the fact that theoretical methods can provide detailed results it is still rather unusual in experimental studies of joints to gather data other than that of a joint’s global load-displacement response. Modern contact-free measurement techniques should be possible to employ in order to fill this gap. Some studies in which measurement techniques of this type have been used for timber joints have been reported in the literature. For example, Masuda and Tabata (2001) studied single-bolt joints by use of a digital image correlation method, comparing the results with those of theoretical analyses. A close correlation between results of the measurements and of the theoretical analyses was obtained, but the results were limited to the area close to the bolt. In order to gain a better understanding of the overall performance of timber joints, a larger area around the joint needs to be studied. This is possible today thanks to advanced contact-free measurement systems often commercialized and frequently used as established techniques in areas other than timber engineering. Advantages of these new systems include the possibility of determining deformations and strains within large areas, and of maintaining a high level of accuracy and spatial resolution in a large number of separate instances during loading. Also, such systems can simultaneously record data such as load and displacement readings from the loading machine. In systems of this sort, which in addition are user-friendly, strong efforts have been directed at making it easy to evaluate the measurement data. In the present paper, one such commercial contact-free measurement system is used for studying the joint area in two types of dowel joints loaded in tension parallel to the grain. The aim is to evaluate the results from a general point of view and also to illustrate the advantages and the possibilities of such a measurement system, which does not appear to have been used previously for dowel-type joints. This will involve comparing the results with those of traditional measurement methods and also with those of numerical analysis. Fig. 1 Joint geometries used Abb. 1 Art und Abmessung der untersuchten Verbindung 2 Experimental 2.1 Specimens The two types of joints used in this study are shown in Fig. 1. The type 1 joints, made of Norway spruce, had a mean density of about 450 kg/m3 at 12% moisture content. For type 2 joints, spruce glulam beams manufactured by Moelven Töreboda Limträ AB (L40 quality according to Swedish regulations, approximately the same as the European GL32 quality) were employed. All specimens were stored in a standard climate of 20 ◦C and 65% relative humidity (RH) until 12% moisture equilibrium (±0.6%) was reached, prior to further preparation. The distances a3,t, a4,c and a1 were set according to the minimum values as given in EC5. For type 1, the dowel spacing perpendicular to the grain was twice the minimum distance prescribed by EC5, whereas the minimum distance was used for type 2. The side members were 20 mm thick for type 1 and 30 mm for type 2. The dowels were 12 mm in diameter with a tolerance of ±0.2 mm. The holes in the steel plates, which were cut out by laser, were set to 12.2 mm, with a tolerance of ±0.1 mm. The steel plates were used as templates for drilling the holes in the timber. 2.2 Test setup Eight and five replicates for types 1 and 2, respectively, were loaded in tension. The slotted-in steel plate for both types of joints was connected to the loading system by a fork connection, see Fig. 2. For type 1 joints, the other end was first reinforced with plywood and was then connected to a similar fork. For type 2 joints, a wedge device was used for the other end where the specimens were inserted about 1 m into the grip of the testing machine, see Fig. 2. During the loading procedure, the joints were subjected to a displacement-control rate of 0.5 mm/min for type 1 and 0.9 mm/min for type 2 joints. Failure was usually reached within
499 Load en CCD-Kae LOAD CCDECAME which is incuded in the ARAMIS-ystem For eac in the contact zone hetween the dowels and the timber the lo be determined and be converted to relative displacements and strains.The calibration volume selected results ed. the tes approximately 3.0mm for type was measured by two inductive gauges attached on oppo site sides of the joints.see Fig.2. 2.3 Contact-free measurement system 3 Numerical analyses ARAMISTM ABAQUS In 20wsus for ting a random or regular pattem.which is applied to the surfac sion in the joint area.shown in Fig.3.consists of apr oximately and deform ment red.Linear-elastic pehavior was surface.at different occasions during loading.see Fig.2.The assumed for the wood,which for the area close to the dowels air in th mag y loading.the 3D coordinates of these facets on the specim en's EL=15160.E7=505ER=505.G1R=950.GL7=950an lation and 3D GT=5 MPa. al dire s of the N ig. imila Th any tran =0.50.7=0.50 and var=0.70 luded the joint area and part of the stel plate;see the he load vas applied as a uniform deformation (of the was achi the on the area around the dowels.This was done in order to o stiffness.K.of these springs was calculated using the expres ain better ast of the gray sca ung the facets and =(E The in dots were applied by spraying black paint on the surface from d material were e modeled by contact elements involving fric a distance ion in the tangential direction of the dowels.The coefficient of also log on was set te nd fo restricted mainly to a qualitative discussion of them
499 Fig. 2 a Load-setup for type 1 joints, b load-setup for type 2 joints, c application of inductive gauges (similar in the case of both types) and d type 2 joint, into which random patterns are applied, and the CCD-cameras used Abb. 2 a Versuchsanordnung für Prü- fungen des Typs 1, b siehe a für Typ 2 c Anordnung der Induktionswegaufnehmer (für beide Typen ähnlich) und d Verbindung vom Typ 2 mit aufgebrachten stochastischem Muster und eingesetzten CCD-Kameras 5–15 minutes for type 2. For type 1, the time to failure was usually longer and in some cases, owing to large deformations in the contact zone between the dowels and the timber, the loading procedure was ended before a complete failure by tearing the test specimen apart occurred. During the tests, the load was recorded and the relative displacement between the plate and the timber was measured by two inductive gauges attached on opposite sides of the joints, see Fig. 2. 2.3 Contact-free measurement system The measurement system ARAMISTM manufactured by the company GOM was employed. The system is based on evaluating a random or regular pattern, which is applied to the surface and deforms along with the material. The placing of two CCD cameras (1280 by 1024 resolution) in front of the specimen at different angles enables stereoscopic pictures of the patterned surface, at different occasions during loading, see Fig. 2. The first digital-image processing step defines macro-image facets in the image pair in the original, unloaded state. For each stage of loading, the 3D coordinates of these facets on the specimen’s surface are calculated accurately using image correlation and photogrammetric principles. On the bases of these 3D coordinates, the 3D displacements, rotations and in-plane strains as well as the shape of the specimen can be calculated with a high degree of spatial resolution. The test arrangements for all the joints were similar. The CCD cameras were calibrated to a measurement volume that included the joint area and part of the steel plate; see the area inside the dashed lines in Fig. 2. A random pattern was achieved in two steps. First a matt light-colored paint was sprayed on the area around the dowels. This was done in order to obtain better contrast of the gray scale defining the facets and also to reduce the shininess of the timber. After this, small black dots were applied by spraying black paint on the surface from a distance. The cameras were triggered every five seconds, also logging analog signal readings of displacement and force from the loading machine. The test images were then processed by the software, which is included in the ARAMIS-system. For each pair of images, 3D coordinates for a large number of facets could be determined and be converted to relative displacements and strains. The calibration volume selected results in a spatial resolution of approximately 3.0 mm for type 1 joints and 4.2 mm for type 2. According to the manufacturer, the strain accuracy is approximately 0.02%. 3 Numerical analyses The FE-software ABAQUS (ABAQUS Inc. 2003) was used for the 2D numerical analyses of the joints. The element subdivision in the joint area, shown in Fig. 3, consists of approximately 8200 elements in the case of type 1 joints and 19 000 elements in the case of type 2. In both cases, 6-node second-order triangular elements were employed. Linear-elastic behavior was assumed for the wood, which for the area close to the dowels is an approximation. The moduli of elasticity and the shear moduli for defining the orthotropic wood material were set to EL = 15 160, ET = 505 ER = 505, GL R = 950, GLT = 950 and GRT = 95 MPa, being estimated from the European EN 338 standard. The indices L, R and T denote the longitudinal, radial and tangential directions of the timber, respectively (Fig. 3). No consideration was taken of the difference between the radial and the tangential direction. Thus, T in Fig. 3 represents any transverse direction in the timber. The Poisson’s ratios used were set to vL R = 0.50, vLT = 0.50 and vRT = 0.70. The load was applied as a uniform deformation (u) of the dowels (Fig. 3). Elastic springs were used for type 2 to simulate the stiffness of the steel plate in the L-direction. The elastic stiffness, K, of these springs was calculated using the expression K = (Eplate × Aplate)/Ldowelspacing. The interaction between the dowels, which was assumed to act as rigid bodies, and the wood material were modeled by contact elements involving friction in the tangential direction of the dowels. The coefficient of friction was set to 0.4. Because of these various approximations in the modeling, the evaluation of the numerical results will be restricted mainly to a qualitative discussion of them
500 Fig.3 Abb.3 El ype G Fig.4 Ex ults.b i RK CRACK 0 123456789 Displacement(mm) Type 05000 2 Dis Type2 e The results for type I joints indicate ductile behavior.This 4 Results and discussion bu lure of 4.1 General eached for the type l ioints two initial cracks usually develo he nedte ped close toeach dowel,see Fig.4.Note that these cra cks are no of the disp
500 Fig. 3 Element subdivision in the joint area for both types of joints Abb. 3 Elementeinteilung im Verbindungsbereich beider Typen Fig. 4 Experimental results for the specimens: a load-displacement results, b initial crack and c final failure modes Abb. 4 Versuchsergebnisse: a KraftWeg-Diagramm, b erster Riss und c Bruchbild 4 Results and discussion 4.1 General The load-displacement curves presented in Fig. 4 are based on the mean value of the displacement readings of the two inductive gauges applied to each specimen (Fig. 2). The results for type 1 joints indicate ductile behavior. This was, however, not caused by plastic hinges developing in the dowels, but by the embedment failure of the wood which led to marked local deformation. Soon after the ultimate load had been reached for the type 1 joints, two initial cracks usually developed close to each dowel, see Fig. 4. Note that these cracks are not located at the dowel centers. This behavior is caused by friction between the dowels and the timber (Rodd 1973). If no friction is
501 the do ing the embedment capacity due tothe area between the initial crack choepCbep sidelReenint ion for the fact that the load usually decreased afer them od wasreached The load-displacement behavior for a type 1 ad of t st to ally by splitting (Fig.4).This cause d the load to drop.Note wing possible rotation and eccentricity in the joint t in some je of the dowels ts the lond-displacemen t results as registered h ctile behavior could be bse MIS-system.This involves calculating the change in length he load The s located on the timber close to the on the failure mode was the so-called block-shear failure,but usually pper picture in Fig. ength in the load-direction points in the ARAMIS-system Type1,Upper side Type1,Lower side 25 20 20 10 asured,Gauges 456 t (mm) lacement (mm 350 Type2.Upper side 350 Type2,Lower side 0 300 250 200 200 150 10 100
501 present, only a single crack develops located centric in relation to the dowels. Two developing cracks have the effect of reducing the embedment capacity due to the area between the initial cracks are taking most of the load, since after the cracks have been initiated, the dowels can more easily push the wood aside (Rodd 1973). This seems to be a plausible explanation for the fact that the load usually decreased after the ultimate load was reached. The development of the two cracks, as described above, in type 1 joints, was usually followed by the final failure mode, usually by splitting (Fig. 4). This caused the load to drop. Note that in some joints the initial cracks in front of the dowels seemed to be propagating up to the final failure, whereas in some cases the final failure seemed to be initiated from the end grain. For type 2 joints, almost no ductile behavior could be observed. Instead, failure occurred at the ultimate load suddenly and the specimens could then no longer transmit load. The primary failure mode was the so-called block-shear failure, but usually in a combination with the so-called row-shear-out failure mode (Fig. 4). Note that prior to final failure the general tendency was Fig. 5 Load-displacement results measured by both the ARAMIS-system and the inductive gauges Abb. 5 Vergleich der mittels ARAMIS-System und Induktionswegaufnehmern bestimmten Kraft-WegDiagramme that an initial crack developed; see Fig. 4, followed almost directly by final failure. 4.2 Comparing load-displacement results of the ARAMIS-system and of the inductive gauges The load-displacement behavior for a type 1 and a type 2 joint is presented in Fig. 5. The results for each of the two gauges are presented there instead of the mean value, in contrast to Fig. 4, allowing possible rotation and eccentricity in the joint area to be studied. In order to compare results of the traditional measurement method with those of the contact-free method, Fig. 5 also presents the load-displacement results as registered by the ARAMIS-system. This involves calculating the change in length in the load direction between points located on the steel plate and points located on the timber close to the respective gauges, see the upper picture in Fig. 5. The results shown in Fig. 5 indicate no marked rotation or eccentricity in the joint area between the steel plate and the timber
502 tronegpsnmtrstnogpanleo Shear strain(%) that install tion of the ading e possible i testn Pedersen t(999showed oa of similar that n the howa close correlation. Fo al. side 5)This explain.One possible explanation is that rotation in the joint that 6 Re ARAMIS. s in the joint area at N: ring results of the strain distribution in the joint area found by the ARAMIS-system and by numerical analysis system were taken in the elastic rgion just before the joints ndicated Path 1 28 kN fo and 270kN for ent csuobtaincd joints of the ARAMIS-system as ●-Path2 hose of the simulated.The results were not compared in the plastic range since u analyse with elastic behavor 0,60 the with the ARAMIS-system.Due to that 050 s possible 0,40 opposite sid 4.4 Type 1 joints MIS 01020304050607080 esented in Fig.6,which ind X-distance (mm) s close correlation bet en th red and For und at the free end in both cas s.This can be obse more ong a patr inF时 Jorissen(1998)has described the influence of shear stresses are pre cracking ter ADA飞I pendicular to the grain along the line where the final crack later sults showing very similar tendencies.As can be cen in Figs.6 curred were st with these findings in mind.The re sults as the ARA -system at seve MIS
502 for type 1 joint, whereas such behavior is observed in the type 2 joint. Hole clearances in the joint area or material defects in the timber are possible explanations for this, but it is also possible that installation of the joints in the wedge device of the loading machine generates this behavior to some extent. The possible in- fluence of eccentricity should not be ignored. In experimental testings, Pedersen et al. (1999) showed eccentricity to affect the load-bearing capacity of similar joints, also finding that increasing the eccentricity produced more brittle behavior. The two measurements systems show a close correlation. For the type 1 joint, the results for both systems being almost identical, wheras there is a slight deviation of the two for type 2 on the lower side of the joint (Fig. 5). This latter deviation is difficult to explain. One possible explanation is that rotation in the joint area may to some extent generate it if one bears in mind the fact that the two systems do not measure the displacement at exactly the same position. 4.3 Comparing results of the strain distribution in the joint area found by the ARAMIS-system and by numerical analysis The strain distributions in the joint area for the two types of joints are presented below. The results obtained by the ARAMISsystem were taken in the elastic region just before the joints indicated plastic behavior in the global load-displacement response involving a total load of approximately 28 kN for type 1 and 270 kN for type 2 (compare this with the load-displacement results obtained for these two joints of the ARAMIS-system as presented in Figs. 8 and 11). For comparing these results with those of the numerical analyses, the same load levels were then simulated. The results were not compared in the plastic range since the numerical analyses dealt only with elastic behavior. It should be emphasized that only the surface on one side of the joints was studied with the ARAMIS-system. Due to that it is possible that, for example, cracks may have occurred on the opposite side of the joints. 4.4 Type 1 joints The results the ARAMIS-system provided and those of the numerical analyses of the strain distribution in the joint area are presented in Fig. 6, which indicates close correlation between the measured and the theoretical values. For example, large tensile strains perpendicular to the grain can be seen to have developed (red areas) in the area between the dowels and the end-grain surface at the free end in both cases. This can be observed more clearly if the strains along a path extending from the dowel towards the end of the grain surface are plotted as shown in Fig. 7, where strains perpendicular to the grain along two different paths are presented both in terms of the numerical analyses and of the measured values obtained using the ARAMIS-system. There is a rather close correlation, both the measured and theoretical results showing very similar tendencies. As can be seen in Figs. 6 and 7, some areas close to the dowels and to the end grain cannot be evaluated using the ARAMIS-system. This can be solved by Fig. 6 Results for the strain distributions in the joint area at 28 kN: a numerical results, b results for the ARAMIS-system Abb. 6 Dehnungsverteilung im Verbindungsbereich bei 28 kN: a numerische Ergebnisse, b mit dem ARAMIS-System ermittelte Ergebnisse Fig. 7 Strain distributions perpendicular to the grain along two paths Abb. 7 Dehnungsverteilung senkrecht zur Faser entlang der Linien 1 und 2 studying only a smaller part of the joint although this would be at the expense of missing the overall picture of the strains in the joint area as a whole. Jorissen (1998) has described the influence of shear stresses and tensile stresses perpendicular to the grain on the cracking tendencies of dowel-type joints. The shear strains and strains perpendicular to the grain along the line where the final crack later occurred were studied with these findings in mind. The results as obtained by the ARAMIS-system at several different stages are shown in Fig. 8. It can be seen that the tensile strains perpendicu-
503 Fig.8 Strains pendicular to the Stage when the the fo 35 6 Crack line 30 20 15 7 10 51 0 3 45 400 ent(mm) 00 3.50 3.00 2,50 2,00 0.50 1.50 1.00 0,50 0,00 0.00 0 1020 304050 6070 )20 30 50 60 long the crack line (mm) X-distance along the crack line (mm) lar to the grain increase between stages 3 and 4 in the area close end grain and that large shear strains develop in the rows of do st to the dge This is clearly lyheinitiatc of tens 4.5 Type 2joints 、ble that he9 ing to the Note that the results showr in Fig.9 indicate ter dis propa his str where the initial tem at ever aes the area not taken into account in the analysis.For instance.due to hole cular to the grain to increase at every stage in the area closest rances.varation n suiffness between different parts of the to the end grain.By using the same estimated mod ulus of ela da ber and ma sof oth be a no was used in the Cramer(18).Lantos (19)and Wilkinson (1).One exam about 1.5 MPa.This value is larger than the characteristic tensile ple of this is the innuence of knots show nin Fig.9,indicating perpendicular to the grain in glulam (accor There are also certain marked similarities when one co t each stage especialy close to the dowel.at the position res the results of the numerical nalyses with the n red result Thus.it is just s likely that a crack either w initi I by the strains parallel to ear stra hear stra or by th lel to the grain develop in the column of dowels farthest from the interaction criterion may be needed in order to accurately predict
503 Fig. 8 Strains perpendicular to the grain as well as shear strains at several loading stages along the line where the final crack later developed. The load displacement results in the picture at the upper left indicate the load levels chosen for evaluation Abb. 8 Dehnungen senkrecht zur Faser und Schubdehnungen bei verschiedenen Lastzuständen entlang des entstehenden Bruchverlaufs. Im Kraft-Weg-Diagramm im oberen linken Bild sind die gewählten Lastzustände angegeben lar to the grain increase between stages 3 and 4 in the area close to the dowel. The same tendency can also be noted for the shear strains. It is likely, therefore, that the initial crack shown in Fig. 4 was initiated at these stages and was propagated further during stages that remained. The tendency, as discussed above, for the final failure mode for some of the specimens to apparently be initiated at the end grain could not be verified for this particular specimen. 4.5 Type 2 joints Note that the results shown in Fig. 9 indicate a greater discrepancy in the measured and the calculated results in the case of the type 2 joint than of the smaller type 1 joint. A possible explanation for this is that further parameters are involved, ones not taken into account in the analysis. For instance, due to hole clearances, variations in stiffness between different parts of the timber, and material defects of other types there may be a nonuniform load distribution between the dowels, see for example Cramer (1968), Lantos (1969) and Wilkinson (1986). One example of this is the influence of knots shown in Fig. 9, indicating large strains to develop in the area around the knot. There are also certain marked similarities when one compares the results of the numerical analyses with the measured results. In studying the strains parallel to the grain and the shear strains as shown in Fig. 9, one can note that large tensile strains parallel to the grain develop in the column of dowels farthest from the end grain and that large shear strains develop in the rows of dowels closest to the edges. This is clearly of interest in considering the block-shear failure mode observed during testing and mentioned in the introduction, see Fig. 10. The authors are not aware of findings of this type having been reported in the literature. The presence of tensile strains perpendicular to the grain is of considerable importance. As discussed above, the ARAMISsystem indicated tensile strains to be found in the area close to the end grain. It is possible that cracks are initiated there and are propagated further, leading to the block-shear failure mode. In order to study this, strains perpendicular to the grain as well as shear strains, were studied with use of the ARAMIS-system at several different stages in the area where the initial crack later occurred (Fig. 11). The results indicate tensile strains perpendicular to the grain to increase at every stage in the area closest to the end grain. By using the same estimated modulus of elasticity perpendicular to the grain that was used in the numerical analyses, the tensile stresses in this area can be estimated to about 1.5 MPa. This value is larger than the characteristic tensile strength perpendicular to the grain in glulam (according to EN 1194). However, the shear strains also increase to a higher level at each stage, especially close to the dowel, at the x = 0 position. Thus, it is just as likely that a crack either was initiated by the shear strains or by the tensile strains discussed above. With these results and considerations in mind, one can ask whether a stress interaction criterion may be needed in order to accurately predict
504 stongPnr stneg3n Shear strain(%) results fo im Ver 。 Knots Shear stresses .The results of both the ARAMIS-system and the numerical shear failure mode.This is a finding which has not bee reported previously in the literature. he results of the MIS-system indicate a no e.g.Cramer (1968).Lantos (1969)and Wilkinsc n(1986.2 w joints stud a possble negative effect of there being severa owe grain separately.assumine in connection with this that the joint tors for this are included. capacity is governed by the maximum value for the two disadvantages of the contact-free measurement 5 Conclusions The cm of thed-dispacemn General observations: system showed that the latter technique not only can be pply gauges
504 Fig. 9 Results for the strain distributions in the joint area at 270 kN: a numerical results, b results for the ARAMIS-system and presence of knots in the areas inside the dashed lines Abb. 9 Dehnungsverteilungen im Verbindungsbereich bei 270 kN: a numerische Ergebnisse, b mit dem ARAMISSystem ermittelte Ergebnisse und Darstellung von Ästen in den gestrichelten Bereichen Fig. 10 The block-shear failure mode Abb. 10 Blockscherversagen the block-shear failure mode. At present, the EC5 code considers the shear capacity and the tension capacity parallel to the grain separately, assuming in connection with this that the joint capacity is governed by the maximum value for the two. 5 Conclusions General observations: • The results for the type 2 joint confirm the brittle failure tendencies for multiple dowel joints loaded in tension parallel to the grain, that have been reported in other studies. • The results of both the ARAMIS-system and the numerical analyses indicate shear strains and tensile strains parallel to the grain to be concentrated to areas that generate the blockshear failure mode. This is a finding which has not been reported previously in the literature. • The results of the ARAMIS-system indicate a non-uniform load distribution in the joint area for type 2 joints. Although this behavior has been taken up in the literature earlier, see e.g. Cramer (1968), Lantos (1969) and Wilkinson (1986), attention there has been directed at single row joints. On the basis of the load distribution obtained in the present study, a possible negative effect of there being several dowel rows should not be ignored. In the Canadian timber design code (CSA O86.1. 2001), in contrast to EC5 code, reduction factors for this are included. Advantages and disadvantages of the contact-free measurement system employed: • The comparisons of the load-displacement results obtained through measurements by the gauges and by the ARAMISsystem showed that the latter technique not only can be a complement, but also replace traditional measurement techniques. This can especially be the case if it is difficult to apply gauges
505 Saoentn9spm8nron (NM)PEoT [34 2☐ 98 LOAD Displ 030 020 0,10 0.00 -0,10 -0.20 1女23◆ 030 ancecrack line (m) ◆12430-4 0,30 0.10 0.00 100 stance along the crack line (mm) Contact-free measurement techniques appear to be valuable on the other side of it could not be detected.The solution to as a m Using ossible solutio n to another of oted for th ger type 2 join Using contact-fre measu ement techniqucs might be one that a large area was being studied.This meant that some way to study this behavior. areas of the joint could not be studied adequately.especially A great advantage in th ese of a contact-free measure this. rest before performing a test.Ins .This is very useful.for dying the initiation ofacrack.the strain,which nem nd T ork is tha a joint was studied in each case.meaning that possible cracks AB in Sweden for use of the conta tto Mo
505 Fig. 11 Strains perpendicular to grain and shear strains at several stages in the area along the line where the initial crack later occurred. The load displacement results in the picture at the upper left show which stage is chosen for evaluation Abb. 11 Dehnungen senkrecht zur Faser und Schubdehnungen bei verschiedenen Lastzuständen im Bereich des später entstehenden ersten Risses. Im KraftWeg-Diagramm im oberen linken Bild sind die gewählten Lastzustände angegeben • Contact-free measurement techniques appear to be valuable tools for calibration in theoretical analyses. They also allow the user to study which parameters are of greatest interest and also make it possible to study non-uniform load distribution within a joint. • It is difficult at present to model the non-linear behavior of timber, a matter which is of interest in studying timber joints. Using contact-free measurement techniques might be one way to study this behavior. • A great advantage in the use of a contact-free measurement system as compared to other measurement techniques is that the user does not have to know which area is of greatest interest before performing a test. Instead, the user can first carry out a test and then evaluate which areas one should devote greater attention to. This is very useful, for example, when studying the initiation of a crack, since it allows the strain, which is present prior to the crack being initiated, to be analyzed. • One problem which is obvious here is that only one side of a joint was studied in each case, meaning that possible cracks on the other side of it could not be detected. The solution to this problem would be to use two measurement systems, acting as a master and slave pair. Then both sides of the joints can be detected at the same instants. • Using two systems could be a possible solution to another type of problem, noted for the larger type 2 joint. The problem was the rather weak resolution obtained, due to the fact that a large area was being studied. This meant that some areas of the joint could not be studied adequately, especially areas in the close vicinity of the dowels. Using two measurement systems of differing resolution could have avoided this. Acknowledgement This research was made possible thanks to financial support obtained from the Development Fund of the Swedish Construction Industry (SBUF), the Wood Science Program at Växjö University (WDATWood Design and Technology) and Skanska AB. The work was carried out at Växjö University and at SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute. Special thanks to GOM GmbH in Germany and Cascade Computing AB in Sweden for use of the contact-free measurement equipment, to Mo-
506 hTgeeeoaac References ABAQUS Inc.(2003)ABAQUS/Standard and ABAQUS/CAE Version64. Cr ngin ering design in wood (Limits States Design).Can eting.pape cted to lateral g是
506 elven Töreboda Limträ AB for providing the glulam beams and to Mr. Arne Emilsson of Limträteknik AB for the valuable advice he provided. References ABAQUS Inc. (2003) ABAQUS/Standard and ABAQUS/CAE Version 6.4, User Manuals Cramer CO (1968) Load distribution in multiple-bolt tension joints. J Struct Div ASCE 94:1101–1117 CSA O86.1. (2001) Engineering design in wood (Limits States Design). Can Stand Assoc Eurocode 5 (2004) Design of timber structures. EN 1995-1-1:2004(E) Johansen KW (1949) Theory of timber connections. Int Assoc Bridge Struct Eng 9:249–262 Jorissen A (1998) Double shear timber connections with dowel type fasteners. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University, Delft, The Netherlands Lantos G (1969) Load distribution in a row of fasteners subjected to lateral load. Wood Sci 1(3):129–136 Masuda M, Tabata K (2001) Theoretical and experimental analyses of fracture of wood in pinned joint using DIC and FSAFC (Finite Small Area Fracture Criterion). Proc Int RILEM Symp, Stuttgart, Germany Pedersen MU, Clorius CO, Damkilde L, Hoffmeyer P, Eskildsen L (1999) Dowel type connections with slotted-in steel plates. Proc CIB W18 Meeting, paper CIB-W18/32-7-8 Quenneville JHP, Mohammad M (2000) On the failure modes and strength of steel-to-timber bolted connections loaded parallel-to-grain. Can J Eng 27:761–773 Ranta-Maunus A, Kevarinmäki A (2003) Reliability of timber structures theory and dowel-type connection failures. Proc CIB W18 Meeting, paper CIB-W18/36-17-1, Colorado, USA Rodd PD (1973) The analysis of timber joints made with circular dowel connectors. Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, England Schmid M, Blass HJ, Frasson RPM (2002) Effect of distances, spacing and number of dowels in a row on the load carrying capacity of connections with dowels failing by splitting. Proc CIB W18 Meeting, paper CIB-W18/31-9-1, Kyoto, Japan Wilkinson TL (1986) Load distribution among bolts parallel to load. J Struct Eng ASCE 112(4):835–852