2005年考研英语真题和答案 Section I Use of english Directions Read the following text. Choose the best word(s)for each numbered blank and mark [A],, [C] or [D] on ANSWER SHEET 1(10 points) The human nose is an underrated tool. Humans are often thought to be insensitive smellers compared with animals, this is largely because animals, we stand upright. This means that our noses are to perceiving those smells which float through the air, the majority of smells which stick to surfaces. In fact,, we are extremely sensitive to smells, we do not generally realize it. Our noses are capable of human smells even when these are to far below one part in one million Strangely, some people find that they can smell one type of flower but not another, others are sensitive to the smells of both flowers. This may be because some people do not have the genes necessary to generate in the nose. These receptors are the cells which sense smells and send to the brain. However, it has been found that even people insensitive to a certain smell can suddenly become sensitive to it when to IT OTTen eno ugl The explanation for insensitivity to smell seems to be that the brain finds it to keep all smell receptors working all the time but can new receptors
2005 年考研英语真题和答案 Section I Use of English Directions: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark [A], , [C] or [D] on ANSWER SHEET 1 (10 points) The human nose is an underrated tool. Humans are often thought to be insensitive smellers compared with animals, this is largely because, animals, we stand upright. This means that our noses are to perceiving those smells which float through the air, the majority of smells which stick to surfaces. In fact, , we are extremely sensitive to smells, we do not generally realize it. Our noses are capable of human smells even when these are to far below one part in one million. Strangely, some people find that they can smell one type of flower but not another, others are sensitive to the smells of both flowers. This may be because some people do not have the genes necessary to generate smell receptors in the nose. These receptors are the cells which sense smells and send to the brain. However, it has been found that even people insensitive to a certain smell can suddenly become sensitive to it when to it often enough. The explanation for insensitivity to smell seems to be that the brain finds it to keep all smell receptors working all the time but can new receptors
if necessary. This may explain why we are not usually sensitive to our own smells-we simply do not need to be. We are not of the usual smell of our own house but we new smells when we visit someone elses. The brain finds it best to keep smell receptors for unfamiliar and emergency signals the smell of smoke, which might indicate the danger of fire 1. [A] although [c] but [D] while 2. [A] above unlike [C] excluding [D] besides 3. [A]limited committed [C] dedicated D] confined 4. [A] catching tracking 5. [A anyway
if necessary. This may explain why we are not usually sensitive to our own smells—we simply do not need to be. We are not of the usual smell of our own house, but we new smells when we visit someone else’s. The brain finds it best to keep smell receptors for unfamiliar and emergency signals the smell of smoke, which might indicate the danger of fire. 1. [A] although as [C] but [D] while 2. [A] above unlike [C] excluding [D] besides 3. [A] limited committed [C] dedicated [D] confined 4. [A] catching ignoring [C] missing [D] tracking 5. [A] anyway
though [C] instead [D] therefore 6. [A] even if [C] only if D]as讦f 7. [A] distinguishing discovering [C] determining [D] detecting 8. [A] diluted dissolved [C] dispersed [D] diffused 9. [A] when sInce [c] for [D] whe 10. [A] unusual particular [C] unique
though [C] instead [D] therefore 6. [A] even if if only [C] only if [D] as if 7. [A] distinguishing discovering [C] determining [D] detecting 8. [A] diluted dissolved [C] dispersed [D] diffused 9. [A] when since [C] for [D] whereas 10. [A] unusual particular [C] unique
[D] typical 11. [A] signs stimuli [C] messages [D] impulses 12. [A] at first at all [c] at large [D] at times 13. [A] subjected left rawn [D] exposed 14. [A] ineffective incompetent [c] inefficient [D] insufficient 15. [A] introduce summon [C] trigger creaTe 16. [A] still
[D] typical 11. [A] signs stimuli [C] messages [D] impulses 12. [A] at first at all [C] at large [D] at times 13. [A] subjected left [C] drawn [D] exposed 14. [A] ineffective incompetent [C] inefficient [D] insufficient 15. [A] introduce summon [C] trigger [D] create 16. [A] still
[C] otherwise [D] nevertheless 17. [A]sure aware d 18. [A] tolerate repe [C] neglect [D] notice 19. [A] available [C] identifiable [D] suitable 20. [A] similar to such as [c] along with [D] aside from Section II Reading Comprehension Part A Directions
also [C] otherwise [D] nevertheless 17. [A] sure sick [C] aware [D] tired 18. [A] tolerate repel [C] neglect [D] notice 19. [A] available reliable [C] identifiable [D] suitable 20. [A] similar to such as [C] along with [D] aside from Section II Reading Comprehension Part A Directions:
Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing [A],, [C] or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1 (40 points) Text 1 Everybody loves a fat pay rise. yet pleasure at your own can vanish if ou learn that a colleague has been given a bigger one. Indeed, if he has a reputation for slacking, you might even be outraged. Such behaviour is regarded as"all too human, with the underlying assumption that other animals would not be capable of this finely developed sense of grievance But a study by Sarah Brosnan and frans de waal of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, which has just been published in Nature, suggests that it is all too monkey, as well e researchers sTual ed the behaviour of female brown capuchin monkeys They look cute. They are good-natured, co-operative creatures, and they share their food readily. Above all, like their female human counterparts, they tend to pay much closer attention to the value of goods and services" than males Such characteristics make them perfect candidates for Dr. Brosnans and Dr de Waal's study. The researchers spent two years teaching their monkeys to exchange tokens for food normally the monkeys were happy enough to exchange pieces of rock for slices of cucumber. However, when two monkeys were placed in separate but adjoining chambers, so that
Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing [A], , [C] or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1 (40 points) Text 1 Everybody loves a fat pay rise. Yet pleasure at your own can vanish if you learn that a colleague has been given a bigger one. Indeed, if he has a reputation for slacking, you might even be outraged. Such behaviour is regarded as “all too human,” with the underlying assumption that other animals would not be capable of this finely developed sense of grievance. But a study by Sarah Brosnan and Frans de Waal of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, which has just been published in Nature, suggests that it is all too monkey, as well. The researchers studied the behaviour of female brown capuchin monkeys. They look cute. They are good-natured, co-operative creatures, and they share their food readily. Above all, like their female human counterparts, they tend to pay much closer attention to the value of “goods and services” than males. Such characteristics make them perfect candidates for Dr. Brosnan’s and Dr. de Waal’s study. The researchers spent two years teaching their monkeys to exchange tokens for food. Normally, the monkeys were happy enough to exchange pieces of rock for slices of cucumber. However, when two monkeys were placed in separate but adjoining chambers, so that
each could observe what the other was getting in return for its rock their behaviour became markedly different In the world of capuchins, grapes are luxury goods(and much preferable bers). So when one monkey was handed a grape in exchange for her token, the second was reluctant to hand hers over for a mere piece of cucumber. And if one received a grape without having to provide her token in exchange at all, the other either tossed her own token at the researcher or out of the chamber, or refused to accept the slice of cUcU deed, the mere presence of a grape in the other chamber (without an actual monkey to eat it)was enough to induce resentment in a female capuchin The researchers suggest that capuchin monkeys, like humans, are guided by social emotions. In the wild, they are a co-operative, group-living species. Such co-operation is likely to be stable only when each animal feels it is not being cheated. Feelings of righteous indignation, it seems are not the preserve of people alone. Refusing a lesser reward completely makes these feelings abundantly clear to other members of the group However, whether such a sense of fairness evolved independently in capuchins and humans, or whether it stems from the common ancestor that the species had 35 million years ago, is, as yet, an unanswered jesti Ion he opening paragraph, the author introduces his topic
each could observe what the other was getting in return for its rock, their behaviour became markedly different. In the world of capuchins, grapes are luxury goods (and much preferable to cucumbers). So when one monkey was handed a grape in exchange for her token, the second was reluctant to hand hers over for a mere piece of cucumber. And if one received a grape without having to provide her token in exchange at all, the other either tossed her own token at the researcher or out of the chamber, or refused to accept the slice of cucumber. Indeed, the mere presence of a grape in the other chamber (without an actual monkey to eat it) was enough to induce resentment in a female capuchin. The researchers suggest that capuchin monkeys, like humans, are guided by social emotions. In the wild, they are a co-operative, group-living species. Such co-operation is likely to be stable only when each animal feels it is not being cheated. Feelings of righteous indignation, it seems, are not the preserve of people alone. Refusing a lesser reward completely makes these feelings abundantly clear to other members of the group. However, whether such a sense of fairness evolved independently in capuchins and humans, or whether it stems from the common ancestor that the species had 35 million years ago, is, as yet, an unanswered question. 21. In the opening paragraph, the author introduces his topic by
[A] posing a contrast justifying an assumption [C] making a comparison [D] explaining a phenomenon 22. The statement it is all too monkey" Last line, Paragraph b) implies that [A] monkeys are also outraged by slack rivals resenting unfairness is also monkeys nature [C] monkeys, like humans, tend to be jealous of each other [D] no animals other than monkeys can develop such emotions 23. Female capuchin monkeys were chosen for the research most ecause [A] more inclined to weigh what they get attentive to researchers' instructions [C] nice in both appearance and temperament D] more generous than their male companions 24. Dr. Brosnan and Dr. de waal have eventually found in their study that the monkeys [A] prefer grapes to cucumbers can be taught to exchange things ill not be co-operative if feeling cheated
________. [A] posing a contrast justifying an assumption [C] making a comparison [D] explaining a phenomenon 22. The statement “it is all too monkey” (Last line, Paragraph l) implies that ________. [A] monkeys are also outraged by slack rivals resenting unfairness is also monkeys’ nature [C] monkeys, like humans, tend to be jealous of each other [D] no animals other than monkeys can develop such emotions 23. Female capuchin monkeys were chosen for the research most probably because they are ________. [A] more inclined to weigh what they get attentive to researchers’ instructions [C] nice in both appearance and temperament [D] more generous than their male companions 24. Dr. Brosnan and Dr. de Waal have eventually found in their study that the monkeys ________. [A] prefer grapes to cucumbers can be taught to exchange things [C] will not be co-operative if feeling cheated
[D] are unhappy when separated from others 25. What can we infer from the last paragraph? [A] Monkeys can be trained to develop social emotions Human indignation evolved from an uncertain source [C] Animals usually show their feelings openly as humans do [D] Cooperation among monkeys remains stable only in the wild Text 2 Do you remember all those years when scientists argued that smoking would kill us but the doubters insisted that we didn t know for sure? That the evidence was inconclusive. the science uncertain? That the antismoking lobby was out to destroy our way of life and the government should stay out of the way Lots of Americans bought that nonsense, and over three decades, some 10 million smokers went to early graves There are upsetting parallels today, as scientists in one wave after another try to awaken us to the growing threat of global warming. The latest was a panel from the National Academy of sciences, enlisted by the White House, to tell us that the Earth's atmosphere is definitely warming and that the problem is largely man-made. The clear message is that we should get moving to protect ourselves. The president of the National Academy, Bruce Alberts, added this key point in the preface to the panels report: Science never has all the answers. But science does provide us with the best available guide to the future, and it is critical
[D] are unhappy when separated from others 25. What can we infer from the last paragraph? [A] Monkeys can be trained to develop social emotions. Human indignation evolved from an uncertain source. [C] Animals usually show their feelings openly as humans do. [D] Cooperation among monkeys remains stable only in the wild. Text 2 Do you remember all those years when scientists argued that smoking would kill us but the doubters insisted that we didn’t know for sure? That the evidence was inconclusive, the science uncertain? That the antismoking lobby was out to destroy our way of life and the government should stay out of the way? Lots of Americans bought that nonsense, and over three decades, some 10 million smokers went to early graves. There are upsetting parallels today, as scientists in one wave after another try to awaken us to the growing threat of global warming. The latest was a panel from the National Academy of Sciences, enlisted by the White House, to tell us that the Earth’s atmosphere is definitely warming and that the problem is largely man-made. The clear message is that we should get moving to protect ourselves. The president of the National Academy, Bruce Alberts, added this key point in the preface to the panel’s report: “Science never has all the answers. But science does provide us with the best available guide to the future, and it is critical
that our nation and the world base important policies on the best judgments that science can provide concerning the future consequences of present actions Just as on smoking, voices now come from many quarters insisting that the science about global warming is incomplete, that it's Ok to keep ouring fumes into the air until we know for sure. This is a dangerous game: by the time 100 percent of the evidence is in, it may be too late With the risks obvious and growing a prudent people would take out an Insurance policy now Fortunately, the White House is starting to pay attention. But its obvious that a majority of the presidents advisers still don't take global warming seriously. Instead of a plan of action, they continue to press for more research --a classic case of paralysis by analysis To serve as responsible stewards of the planet, we must press forward on deeper atmospheric and oceanic research. But research alone is inadequate. If the Administration won't take the legislative initiative Congress should help to begin fashioning conservation measures. A bill by emocratic Senator robert byrd of west virginia, which would offer financial incentives for private industry, is a promising start. Many see that the country is getting ready to build lots of new power plants to meet our energy needs. If we are ever going to protect the atmosphere, it is crucial that those new plants be environmentally sound
that our nation and the world base important policies on the best judgments that science can provide concerning the future consequences of present actions.” Just as on smoking, voices now come from many quarters insisting that the science about global warming is incomplete, that it’s OK to keep pouring fumes into the air until we know for sure. This is a dangerous game: by the time 100 percent of the evidence is in, it may be too late. With the risks obvious and growing, a prudent people would take out an insurance policy now. Fortunately, the White House is starting to pay attention. But it’s obvious that a majority of the president’s advisers still don’t take global warming seriously. Instead of a plan of action, they continue to press for more research -- a classic case of “paralysis by analysis.” To serve as responsible stewards of the planet, we must press forward on deeper atmospheric and oceanic research. But research alone is inadequate. If the Administration won’t take the legislative initiative, Congress should help to begin fashioning conservation measures. A bill by Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, which would offer financial incentives for private industry, is a promising start. Many see that the country is getting ready to build lots of new power plants to meet our energy needs. If we are ever going to protect the atmosphere, it is crucial that those new plants be environmentally sound
