European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61(2013)95-103 Contents lists available at sciverse ScienceDirect European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry ELSEVIER journalhomepagehttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/ejmech Original article Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of benzothiazepinones (btzs )as nov non-AtP competitive inhibitors of glycogen synthase kinase-3B(GSK-3 Peng Zhang a, Hai-Rong Hu, Shi-Hui Bian Zhao-Hui Huang a, Yong Chua, De-Yong Ye a.* Key Laboratory of State Genetics Engineering, School of life Sciences, Fudan University, 220 Handan Rd, Shanghai 200433, china A INFO ABSTRACT Glycogen synthase kinase-3B(GSK-3B)plays a key role in type ll diabetes and Alzheimers diseases, to eceived 1 March 2012 hich non-ATP competitive inhibitors represent an effectively therapeutical approach due to their good Received in revised form pecificity. Herein, a series of small molecules benzothiazepinones(Btzs)as novel non-ATP competitive 31July2012 Accepted 13 September 2012 inhibitors of GSK-3B have been designed and synthesized. The in vitro evaluation performed by lumi- vailable online 21 September 2012 ent assay showed most biz derivatives have inhibitory effects in micromolar scale. Among them ounds 61, 6t and 6v have the ICso values of 25.0 HM, 27.8 uM and 23.0 uM, respectively. Moreover 6v oid of any inhibitory activity in the assays to other thirteen protein kinases. Besides, SAR is analyzed hypothetical enzymatic binding mode is proposed by molecular docking study, which would be for new candidates design. e 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. nzothiazepinone Docking 1. Introduction effects. Normally these inhibitors would be inherently more pecific and usually show a far better true efficacy in cell or in vivo Glycogen synthase kinase-3B(GSK-3B) plays a key role in the assays than in vitro assays 9]. Thus, developing non-ATP compet egulation of many physiological responses in mammalian cells as itive GSK-3B inhibitors with high selectivity has already been a new a multifunctional serine/threonine protein kinase [1]. Its phos- hot spot for medicinal chemists in recent years. phorylation process controls a multitude of cellular processes, To our best knowledge, five kinds of chemical families of GSK-3B including gene transcription, metabolic pathways, cell growth and inhibitor with non-ATP competitive mechanism are already re- differentiation, as well as apoptosis [2,3]. Thus, inhibition of GSK-3B ported(see Fig. 1). It is worth noting that all of their Icso values are may represent a novel approach for the therapy of several human in micromolar level, suggesting poor activity in vitro of such type of diseases, such as type ll diabetes, Alzheimers diseases(AD), chronic inhibitors. The first ones are the thiadiazolidinones(tzds)[10]. inflammatory diseases, bipolar disorders and cancer [4-6] Among them, one compound called tideglusib(NP-12)is currently The search for GSK-3B inhibitors has spanned more than undergoing Phase llb clinical trials both on AD and orphan tauop a decade, and a number of structural diverse molecules that inhibit athy, and it is also the only gsK-3B inhibitor under clinical phase GSK-3B have already been reported in literature [7. However, the far [11. Halomethylketones(HMKs)are the second ones and have great majority of them might offer unfavorable off-target effects recently been viewed as the first irreversible GSK-3B inhibitors nsidering they are almost ATP competitors. Such inhibitors bind [12, 13. The irreversible inhibition is due to the formation of an competitively at the atp binding site of GSK-3B and are likely to act irreversible covalent sulfur-carbon bond between the hMK moiety on other undesirable protein kinases because of the highly and the amino acid residue Cys 199. This key amino acid residue conservation of aTP binding domain among more than 500 protein plays the role as 'gatekeeper' of GSK-3B [14 The small peptide kinases of human kinome [8 Nowadays non-ATP competitive L803-mts acts as substrate competitive inhibitor effectively in vi inhibitors are expected to be promising drugs for reducing adverse for neurological diseases and type ll diabetes [15 Lately, two marine natural products of alkaloid manzamine A and ses- rresponding authors. mailaddresses:cy110@fudan.edu.cn(YChu).dyye@shmueducn(D-YYe). ylation as cell permeable non-ATP competitive inhibitors 5, 16]. 0223-5234s-see front matter o 2012 1 p: //dx. doiorg /10.1016 j. ejmech 2012.0
Original article Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of benzothiazepinones (BTZs) as novel non-ATP competitive inhibitors of glycogen synthase kinase-3b (GSK-3b) Peng Zhang a , Hai-Rong Hu b , Shi-Hui Bian a , Zhao-Hui Huang a , Yong Chu a,*, De-Yong Ye a,* aDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, 826 Zhangheng Rd, Shanghai 201203, China b Key Laboratory of State Genetics Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 220 Handan Rd, Shanghai 200433, China article info Article history: Received 1 March 2012 Received in revised form 31 July 2012 Accepted 13 September 2012 Available online 21 September 2012 Keywords: GSK-3b Kinase inhibitor Non-ATP competitive Benzothiazepinones Selectivity Docking abstract Glycogen synthase kinase-3b (GSK-3b) plays a key role in type II diabetes and Alzheimer’s diseases, to which non-ATP competitive inhibitors represent an effectively therapeutical approach due to their good specificity. Herein, a series of small molecules benzothiazepinones (BTZs) as novel non-ATP competitive inhibitors of GSK-3b have been designed and synthesized. The in vitro evaluation performed by luminescent assay showed most BTZ derivatives have inhibitory effects in micromolar scale. Among them compounds 6l, 6t and 6v have the IC50 values of 25.0 mM, 27.8 mM and 23.0 mM, respectively. Moreover 6v is devoid of any inhibitory activity in the assays to other thirteen protein kinases. Besides, SAR is analyzed and a hypothetical enzymatic binding mode is proposed by molecular docking study, which would be useful for new candidates design. 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Glycogen synthase kinase-3b (GSK-3b) plays a key role in the regulation of many physiological responses in mammalian cells as a multifunctional serine/threonine protein kinase [1]. Its phosphorylation process controls a multitude of cellular processes, including gene transcription, metabolic pathways, cell growth and differentiation, as well as apoptosis [2,3]. Thus, inhibition of GSK-3b may represent a novel approach for the therapy of several human diseases, such as type II diabetes, Alzheimer’s diseases (AD), chronic inflammatory diseases, bipolar disorders and cancer [4e6]. The search for GSK-3b inhibitors has spanned more than a decade, and a number of structural diverse molecules that inhibit GSK-3b have already been reported in literature [7]. However, the great majority of them might offer unfavorable off-target effects considering they are almost ATP competitors. Such inhibitors bind competitively at the ATP binding site of GSK-3b and are likely to act on other undesirable protein kinases because of the highly conservation of ATP binding domain among more than 500 protein kinases of human kinome [8]. Nowadays non-ATP competitive inhibitors are expected to be promising drugs for reducing adverse effects. Normally these inhibitors would be inherently more specific and usually show a far better true efficacy in cell or in vivo assays than in vitro assays [9]. Thus, developing non-ATP competitive GSK-3b inhibitors with high selectivity has already been a new hot spot for medicinal chemists in recent years. To our best knowledge, five kinds of chemical families of GSK-3b inhibitor with non-ATP competitive mechanism are already reported (see Fig. 1). It is worth noting that all of their IC50 values are in micromolar level, suggesting poor activity in vitro of such type of inhibitors. The first ones are the thiadiazolidinones (TDZDs) [10]. Among them, one compound called tideglusib (NP-12) is currently undergoing Phase IIb clinical trials both on AD and orphan tauopathy, and it is also the only GSK-3b inhibitor under clinical phase so far [11]. Halomethylketones (HMKs) are the second ones and have recently been viewed as the first irreversible GSK-3b inhibitors [12,13]. The irreversible inhibition is due to the formation of an irreversible covalent sulfurecarbon bond between the HMK moiety and the amino acid residue Cys199. This key amino acid residue plays the role as ‘gatekeeper’ of GSK-3b [14]. The small peptide L803-mts acts as substrate competitive inhibitor effectively in vivo for neurological diseases and type II diabetes [15]. Lately, two marine natural products of alkaloid manzamine A and sesterterpene palinurin are reported to well decrease tau phosphorylation as cell permeable non-ATP competitive inhibitors [5,16]. * Corresponding authors. E-mail addresses: cy110@fudan.edu.cn (Y. Chu), dyye@shmu.edu.cn (D.-Y. Ye). Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ejmech 0223-5234/$ e see front matter 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.09.021 European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61 (2013) 95e103
P Zhang et aL/ European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61(2013)95-103 R C50=2-10M IC50=1-5uM Ho、O L803-mts Manzamine a s0=10.2M lCso=4.5μM Fig 1. Structures of reported non-ATP competitive GSK-3B inhibitors. erein, we report another novel small heterocyclic benzothia- cyclization of resulting acids 4a-4j with 2-aminobenzenethiol in nes(Btzs)as reversible non-ATP competitive inhibitors high temp gainst GSK-3B. This scaffold was found by us through a virtual 2, 3-dihydro-1, 5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one analogs 5a-5jwere creening for Maybridge database with Autodock 3.0.5. In this successfully obtained in moderate yields from recrystallization [17- docking approach, the X-ray crystal structure of GSK-3B kinase Through the electrophilic substitution of alkyl or acyl halides in PDB ID: 1UV5)was chosen as the model of receptor and a 3D non the nce of NaH at-10C for 30 min, various groups, such as AtP binding pocket composed of Arg 96, Lys 205 and Tyr 216 was alkyl, aromatic alkyl or acyl were introduced to the 5-position of the carefully constructed as screening receptor model. In the results BlZ framework to obtain nalogs 6a-6r, 6u-6y. It is wort several BlZ compounds were top ranked as the effective hits, and noting that unfavorably attacking of C3 position could be avoided wo of them were finally proved against GSK-3B with ICso values of his reaction condition[ 18. As the results, the yields could be high 830 HM and 480 HM respectively(Fig. 2). Inspired by its novel to a range of 80%-100% scaffold new btZ derivatives were designed and successfully Hydrolysis of compound 6m was carried out in a sealed tube synthesized for screening of potent candidates. Finally, some of with concentrated hydrochloric acid at 100C to give compound 6s them demonstrated an in vitro inhibition to GSK-3B in micromolar [19]. which was then treated with thionyl chloride in methanol range, and moreover the compound tested for specificity showed under reflux condition to afford the corresponding methyl ester 6t o activity to a panel of other 13 protein kinases, even the closest(Scheme 2) Cak-1/cyclin B and CK-ll. In this paper, the synthesis, biological The structures of all ew compounds are elu valuation and in silico studies, together with a preliminary their analytical and spectroscopic data(H, C NMR and MS)which structure-activity relationship(SAR)analysis will be described. are collected in the Experimental Section. The results support that the btz derivatives would be promising candidates for further development of pharmacotherapy. 2. Results and discussion 2. 1. Chemistry Compounds 6a-6y were synthesized following the general route described in Scheme 1 The synthesis of 3-substituted-acrylic acids 4a-4j was per- formed by the Knoevenagel condensation of various aromatic formaldehyde 3a-3j with propanedioic acid in the presence of 2:lC50=480pM pyridine and piperidine under reflux condition. Followed by the Fig. 2. Hits of 2, 3-dihydro-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H -ones from virtual screening
Herein, we report another novel small heterocyclic benzothiazepinones (BTZs) as reversible non-ATP competitive inhibitors against GSK-3b. This scaffold was found by us through a virtual screening for Maybridge database with Autodock 3.0.5. In this docking approach, the X-ray crystal structure of GSK-3b kinase (PDB ID: 1UV5) was chosen as the model of receptor and a 3D nonATP binding pocket composed of Arg 96, Lys 205 and Tyr 216 was carefully constructed as screening receptor model. In the results several BTZ compounds were top ranked as the effective hits, and two of them were finally proved against GSK-3b with IC50 values of 830 mM and 480 mM respectively (Fig. 2). Inspired by its novel scaffold, more new BTZ derivatives were designed and successfully synthesized for screening of potent candidates. Finally, some of them demonstrated an in vitro inhibition to GSK-3b in micromolar range, and moreover the compound tested for specificity showed no activity to a panel of other 13 protein kinases, even the closest Cdk-1/cyclin B and CK-II. In this paper, the synthesis, biological evaluation and in silico studies, together with a preliminary structureeactivity relationship (SAR) analysis will be described. The results support that the BTZ derivatives would be promising candidates for further development of pharmacotherapy. 2. Results and discussion 2.1. Chemistry Compounds 6ae6y were synthesized following the general route described in Scheme 1. The synthesis of 3-substituted-acrylic acids 4ae4j was performed by the Knoevenagel condensation of various aromatic formaldehyde 3ae3j with propanedioic acid in the presence of pyridine and piperidine under reflux condition. Followed by the cyclization of resulting acids 4ae4j with 2-aminobenzenethiol in high temperature without any solvent, the key intermediates of 2,3-dihydro-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one analogs 5ae5j were successfully obtained in moderate yields from recrystallization [17]. Through the electrophilic substitution of alkyl or acyl halides in the presence of NaH at 10 C for 30 min, various groups, such as alkyl, aromatic alkyl or acyl were introduced to the 5-position of the BTZ framework to obtain the analogs 6ae6r, 6ue6y. It is worth noting that unfavorably attacking of C3 position could be avoided in this reaction condition [18]. As the results, the yields could be high to a range of 80%e100%. Hydrolysis of compound 6m was carried out in a sealed tube with concentrated hydrochloric acid at 100 C to give compound 6s [19], which was then treated with thionyl chloride in methanol under reflux condition to afford the corresponding methyl ester 6t (Scheme 2). The structures of all the new compounds are elucidated from their analytical and spectroscopic data (1 H, 13C NMR and MS) which are collected in the Experimental Section. Fig. 1. Structures of reported non-ATP competitive GSK-3b inhibitors. Fig. 2. Hits of 2,3-dihydro-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-ones from virtual screening. 96 P. Zhang et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61 (2013) 95e103
P Zhang er al/ European Joumal of Medicinal Chemistry 61(2013)95-10 3a-3j 5a与 6a-6r,6u-6y Scheme 1.(a)CH2(COOH), pyridine, piperidine, 2 h, reflux:( b)2-aminobenzenethiol, 4 A molecular sieve, 6h, 180C: (c)RX, X=CI or Br or l,NaH,DMF,0.5h,-10C. 2.2. Biological evaluation and SAR study preincubation time were measured and the results were shown in Fig 3C. Normally, the inhibition effect of reversible inhibitors does 2.2.1. GSK-3B inhibitio not increase at different incubation time. while an irreversible All the newly prepared BTZ derivatives were evaluated for their inhibitor increases the inhibition percentage as it increases the time GSK-3B inhibitory activity by a recently well described Kinase-GloTm of incubation with the enzyme As could be seen in Fig. 3C, the luminescent technique, which is regarded as a safer nonradioactive activities of 6v were almost kept unchanged with the increasing of assay 20. GS-2 is the most utilized substrate of GSK-3B as a small the pre-incubation time, which indicates compound 6v acts as peptide similar to skeletal muscle glycogen synthase. It is a reversible GSK-3B inhibitor. composed of 26-amino acids and contains a prephosphorylated serine residue. In our assay, we used the prephosphorylated 12-2 23. Kinase selectivity studies amino acids polypeptide substrate 65 HSSPHQ(pS)EDEEE,which High selectivity of protein kinase inhibitors is critical to avoid is as same as the one used by Andrea Baki in a high throughput despread effects in a potential therapy. Thus for evaluating the GSK-3B enzyme was incubated with ATP and GS-2 in the presence sentative compound 6v was assayed against a panel of other 13 or absence of the tested compound, and then the amount of ATP kinases. These kinases include four serine/threonine kinases as emaining in solution, which inversely correlates to kinase activity, Cdk-1/cyclin B, CK-ll, PKA and PKCa which are highly close to GSK was quantified following the kinase reaction. The ICso values are 3B, and nine tyrosine kinases as Flt-1, KDR, PDGFR-B, EPH-A2, EGFR, listed in Table 1 and it can be seen that some of compounds really ErbB2, ErbB4, RON and Abl, which play important role in cancer inhibit GSK-3B in micromolar scale. Among them the best three signaling pathways. All of the inhibitory assays were carried out at compounds 61, 6t and 6v have the ICso values of 25.0 uM, 27. 8 uM a 100 uM of 6v concentration. The serine/ threonine kinases inhi- and 23.0 uM, respectively bition were performed at Millipore Corporation(Dundee, UK) by KinaseProfilerTM service, and the tyrosine kinases screen was 2. 2. 2. Mode of inhibition assayed utilizing an ELISA approach as described in Experimental In order to explore the biological mechanism of BTZ derivatives, section. The results listed in Table 2 showed that compound 6v compound 6v was used to study the kinetic features. We firstly tested almost displayed no inhibitory activity against the whole set of whether a competition effect exists between 6v and ATP. That is, kinases, which to some extent demonstrates that BTZs might have eping the concentration ofGS-2 unchanged the enzyme inhibitor good specificity with respect to GSK-3B activities of compound 6v were measured at its two differer concentrations separately while AtP concentrations varied. The 2. 2. 4. Structure-activity relationships (SAR)analysis results are showed in Fig 3A and it can be seen from the double In order to explore the features between the chemical reciprocal plotting of the data, in which compound 6v acts as a non structures and their GSK-3B inhibition, a preliminary structure ATP competitive inhibitor. Then we explored that whether there is activity relationship of BTzs was analyzed based on the preceding a competitive relationship between 6v and GS-2. In these experi- in vitro data, which were listed in Table 1. The substituents ments, GS-2 concentrations varied and atP concentration was kept attached to the n5 of the btz ring seemed to be important for unchanged as the activities of 6v were measured at concentrations of keeping the activities, of which the benzyl group was the best one 25 HM and 50 uM separately. The results were showed in Fig. 3B and(6f vs 6a-e)in the test set. Furthermore, ortho-nitro group and the double reciprocal plotting of the data in this figure indicates that meta-carbomethoxy group could dramatically contribute to the compound 6v acts as a noncompetitive inhibitor of GS-2 inhibitory potency as attached to the benzyl moiety( 61, 6t). To further investigate the interaction feature of Blzs to the On the other hand. the size and nature of the substituents r enzyme, the inhibitory activities of compound 6v at different attached to the c2 should also be crucial for inhibition. The b COOMe Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a)conc. Ha1, 100oC,7 h; (b)SoCl, MeOH, reflux
2.2. Biological evaluation and SAR study 2.2.1. GSK-3b inhibition All the newly prepared BTZ derivatives were evaluated for their GSK-3b inhibitory activity by a recently well described Kinase-Glo luminescent technique, which is regarded as a safer nonradioactive assay [20]. GS-2 is the most utilized substrate of GSK-3b as a small peptide similar to skeletal muscle glycogen synthase. It is composed of 26-amino acids and contains a prephosphorylated serine residue. In our assay, we used the prephosphorylated 12- amino acids polypeptide substrate 650HSSPHQ (pS)EDEEE, which is as same as the one used by Andrea Baki in a high throughput luminescent assay for looking for GSK-3b inhibitors [20]. Briefly, GSK-3b enzyme was incubated with ATP and GS-2 in the presence or absence of the tested compound, and then the amount of ATP remaining in solution, which inversely correlates to kinase activity, was quantified following the kinase reaction. The IC50 values are listed in Table 1 and it can be seen that some of compounds really inhibit GSK-3b in micromolar scale. Among them the best three compounds 6l, 6t and 6v have the IC50 values of 25.0 mM, 27.8 mM and 23.0 mM, respectively. 2.2.2. Mode of inhibition In order to explore the biological mechanism of BTZ derivatives, compound 6v was used to study the kinetic features.We firstly tested whether a competition effect exists between 6v and ATP. That is, keeping the concentration of GS-2 unchanged, the enzyme inhibitory activities of compound 6v were measured at its two different concentrations separately while ATP concentrations varied. The results are showed in Fig. 3A and it can be seen from the double reciprocal plotting of the data, in which compound 6v acts as a nonATP competitive inhibitor. Then we explored that whether there is a competitive relationship between 6v and GS-2. In these experiments, GS-2 concentrations varied and ATP concentration was kept unchanged as the activities of 6v were measured at concentrations of 25 mM and 50 mM separately. The results were showed in Fig. 3B and the double reciprocal plotting of the data in this figure indicates that compound 6v acts as a noncompetitive inhibitor of GS-2. To further investigate the interaction feature of BTZs to the enzyme, the inhibitory activities of compound 6v at different preincubation time were measured and the results were shown in Fig. 3C. Normally, the inhibition effect of reversible inhibitors does not increase at different incubation time, while an irreversible inhibitor increases the inhibition percentage as it increases the time of incubation with the enzyme. As could be seen in Fig. 3C, the activities of 6v were almost kept unchanged with the increasing of the pre-incubation time, which indicates compound 6v acts as a reversible GSK-3b inhibitor. 2.2.3. Kinase selectivity studies High selectivity of protein kinase inhibitors is critical to avoid widespread effects in a potential therapy. Thus for evaluating the selectivity of BTZ compounds as potential inhibitors, the representative compound 6v was assayed against a panel of other 13 kinases. These kinases include four serine/threonine kinases as Cdk-1/cyclin B, CK-II, PKA and PKCa which are highly close to GSK- 3b, and nine tyrosine kinases as Flt-1, KDR, PDGFR-b, EPH-A2, EGFR, ErbB2, ErbB4, RON and Abl, which play important role in cancer signaling pathways. All of the inhibitory assays were carried out at a 100 mM of 6v concentration. The serine/threonine kinases inhibition were performed at Millipore Corporation (Dundee, UK) by KinaseProfiler service, and the tyrosine kinases screen was assayed utilizing an ELISA approach as described in Experimental section. The results listed in Table 2 showed that compound 6v almost displayed no inhibitory activity against the whole set of kinases, which to some extent demonstrates that BTZs might have good specificity with respect to GSK-3b. 2.2.4. Structureeactivity relationships (SAR) analysis In order to explore the main features between the chemical structures and their GSK-3b inhibition, a preliminary structuree activity relationship of BTZs was analyzed based on the preceding in vitro data, which were listed in Table 1. The substituents R2 attached to the N5 of the BTZ ring seemed to be important for keeping the activities, of which the benzyl group was the best one (6f vs 6aee) in the test set. Furthermore, ortho-nitro group and meta-carbomethoxy group could dramatically contribute to the inhibitory potency as attached to the benzyl moiety (6l, 6t). On the other hand, the size and nature of the substituents R1 attached to the C2 should also be crucial for inhibition. The a bc Scheme 1. (a) CH2(COOH)2, pyridine, piperidine, 2 h, reflux; (b) 2-aminobenzenethiol, 4 A molecular sieve, 6 h, 180 C; (c) R2 X, X ¼ Cl or Br or I, NaH, DMF, 0.5 h, 10 C. a b Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) conc. HCl, 100 C, 7 h; (b) SOCl2, MeOH, reflux. P. Zhang et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61 (2013) 95e103 97
P Zhang et aL/ European Journal of medicinal Chemistry 61(2013)95-103 Table 2 GSK-3B inhibitory activities of compounds 6a-6y. ry activity ( inhibition) of compound 6v(100 HM)against severa R rosine loh Cdk-1/cyclin B 1.5 EPH-A2 -24.3 GFR-Ba-81.8 PKC 12.0 Erbb Su11248 as reference inhibitor for Flt-1(87.1% inhibition), KDR(89.7% inhibi for EGFR(86.9% inhibition). ErbB2(79.4% 2-Thienyl hibition)and ErbB4(82.8% for EPH-A2(83. 1% inhibition), Abl (90.0% d pD173074 as reference inhibitor for RON(93.4% inhibition). 3-Pyridyl 2.2.5. Molecular docking In order to gain an in-depth understanding on the interaction 2-F-Bn 2-CI-Bn mechanism for BTZs within the non-AtP binding pocket of GSK-3B, docking study of compound 6v was performed utilizing the gold 5.0 [21] software. The GSK-3B crystal structure as PDB ID of 1PYX 4-CH,0- was chosen as the model of receptor because it was lately proven to 3-COOMe-Bn be the best one for the non- atP binding in a docking study with three GSK-3B crystal structures(PDB ID: 1PYX, 1Q41, and 1Q4L [22]. The ligand was prepared by minimizing the energy of compound 6v using Sybyl 6.9 31 with the MMFF94 force, and the CI-Ph 2-NOz-B binding site was defined as a sphere of 10 A radius around the 4-Br-Ph 2-NOz-B 78 TDZD-8 residue arg 209, which is suggested to be a key residue for GSK-3B binding process [22]. The suggested binding mode was shown in value of at least two separate determinations, each determina- Fig. 4 and several key interactions were observed. Compound 6v TDZD-8, the first reported non-ATP competitive GSK-3B inhibitor, was used as was located between residues Arg 209 and Ser 236, and its BTZ ring reference compound in this study. ound with Arg 209 by cation-T interaction In addition, there were two hydrogen bonds formed between 6v and the binding pocket. compounds with methyl moiety or without substituent at C2 did One hydrogen bond was attributed to the oxygen of carbonyl on not show any activities(6h, 6i). However, the inhibition potency BIZ ring with Arg 209, and the other one interacted between nitro as enhanced considerably when aromatic groups, such as thienyl, group of the compound and Ser 236. Finally,, C2-subsitituted group furyl, phenyl and benzyl(6f, 6g 6k and 6v) were introduced to O2, of the inhibitor was extended to the hydrophobic region consisting suggesting favorable hydrophobic interactions with the enzyme. of three amino residues (Leu 169, Pro 331 and Thr 330). This In a summary the presence of both a bulky hydrophobic docking mode can well explain the inhibitory activity of compound substituent at N5 position and an aromatic group at C2 position in 6v to GSK-3B. It is worth to note that this result is also consistent the BTZ scaffold(61, 6t, 6u and 6v)seems favorable to increase the with the recently proposed hypothesis by Martinez et al. 221. GSK-3B inhibitory activity. which assumed that three key residues(Arg 209, Thr 235, Ser 236) A2.5 25μM 1.5 25μM control 1[Gs-2] pre-incubation time E+l (min) Fig 3. Kinetic data determined for the compound 6v. (A)ATP concentrations varied from 0.5 uM to 8 uM in the reaction mixture: GS-2 concentration was kept constant at 6.25 HM epicted in the plot. (B)GS-2 concentrations varied from 0.78 uM to 12.5 M in the reaction mixture: ATP concentration was kept constant at 2 HM; ompound concentrations were depicted in the plot. (C)Time dependent GSK-3B inhibition of 6v. Each point was the mean of two separate experiments and each experiment
compounds with methyl moiety or without substituent at C2 did not show any activities (6h, 6i). However, the inhibition potency was enhanced considerably when aromatic groups, such as thienyl, furyl, phenyl and benzyl (6f, 6g, 6k and 6v) were introduced to C2, suggesting favorable hydrophobic interactions with the enzyme. In a summary, the presence of both a bulky hydrophobic substituent at N5 position and an aromatic group at C2 position in the BTZ scaffold (6l, 6t, 6u and 6v) seems favorable to increase the GSK-3b inhibitory activity. 2.2.5. Molecular docking In order to gain an in-depth understanding on the interaction mechanism for BTZs within the non-ATP binding pocket of GSK-3b, a docking study of compound 6v was performed utilizing the GOLD 5.0 [21] software. The GSK-3b crystal structure as PDB ID of 1PYX was chosen as the model of receptor because it was lately proven to be the best one for the non-ATP binding in a docking study with three GSK-3b crystal structures (PDB ID: 1PYX, 1Q41, and 1Q4L) [22]. The ligand was prepared by minimizing the energy of compound 6v using Sybyl 6.9 [31] with the MMFF94 force, and the binding site was defined as a sphere of 10 A radius around the residue Arg 209, which is suggested to be a key residue for GSK-3b binding process [22]. The suggested binding mode was shown in Fig. 4 and several key interactions were observed. Compound 6v was located between residues Arg 209 and Ser 236, and its BTZ ring bound with Arg 209 by cation-p interaction. In addition, there were two hydrogen bonds formed between 6v and the binding pocket. One hydrogen bond was attributed to the oxygen of carbonyl on BTZ ring with Arg 209, and the other one interacted between nitro group of the compound and Ser 236. Finally, C2-subsitituted group of the inhibitor was extended to the hydrophobic region consisting of three amino residues (Leu 169, Pro 331 and Thr 330). This docking mode can well explain the inhibitory activity of compound 6v to GSK-3b. It is worth to note that this result is also consistent with the recently proposed hypothesis by Martinez et al. [22], which assumed that three key residues (Arg 209, Thr 235, Ser 236) Table 1 GSK-3b inhibitory activities of compounds 6ae6y. Compound R1 R2 IC50 (mM)a 6a 2-Thienyl Et >100 6b 2-Thienyl i Pr >100 6c 2-Thienyl n Bu >100 6d 2-Thienyl Cyclohexthylmethyl >100 6e 2-Thienyl Benzoyl >100 6f 2-Thienyl Bn 47.5 6g 2-Furyl Bn 77.2 6h H Bn >100 6i Me Bn >100 6j 3-Pyridyl Bn >100 6k Ph Bn 42.7 6l Ph 2-NO2eBn 25.0 6m Ph 2-CNeBn >100 6n Ph 2-F-Bn >100 6o Ph 2-Cl-Bn >100 6p Ph 2-Br-Bn 73.9 6q Ph 2-CH3eBn 76.1 6r Ph 4-CH3OeBn 73.7 6s Ph 3-COOHeBn >100 6t Ph 3-COOMeeBn 27.8 6u Ph 3-ClePhCOCH2 37.8 6v PhCH2 2-NO2eBn 23.0 6w 4-FePh 2-NO2eBn 81.5 6x 4-ClePh 2-NO2eBn 71.3 6y 4-BrePh 2-NO2eBn 67.8 TDZD-8b e e 1.4 a IC50, the mean value of at least two separate determinations, each determination was mean of triplicate experiments. b TDZD-8, the first reported non-ATP competitive GSK-3b inhibitor, was used as reference compound in this study. Fig. 3. Kinetic data determined for the compound 6v. (A) ATP concentrations varied from 0.5 mM to 8 mM in the reaction mixture; GS-2 concentration was kept constant at 6.25 mM; compound concentrations were depicted in the plot. (B) GS-2 concentrations varied from 0.78 mM to 12.5 mM in the reaction mixture; ATP concentration was kept constant at 2 mM; compound concentrations were depicted in the plot. (C) Time dependent GSK-3b inhibition of 6v. Each point was the mean of two separate experiments and each experiment performed in triplicate. Table 2 Inhibitory activity (% inhibition) of compound 6v (100 mM) against several protein kinases. Serine/ threonine kinases % Inhibition Tyrosine kinases % Inhibition Tyrosine kinases % Inhibition Cdk-1/cyclin B 1.5 Flt-1a 0.6 ErbB4b 0 CK-II 0 KDRa 5.3 EPH-A2c 24.3 PKA 0 PDGFR-ba 81.8 Ablc 18.1 PKCa 12.0 EGFRb 0 RONd 0 e e ErbB2b 2.7 e e a Su11248 as reference inhibitor for Flt-1 (87.1% inhibition), KDR (89.7% inhibition) and PDGFR-b (82.1% inhibition). b BIBW2992 as reference inhibitor for EGFR (86.9% inhibition), ErbB2 (79.4% inhibition) and ErbB4 (82.8% inhibition). c Dasatinib as reference inhibitor for EPH-A2 (83.1% inhibition), Abl (90.0% inhibition). d PD173074 as reference inhibitor for RON (93.4% inhibition). 98 P. Zhang et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61 (2013) 95e103
P Zhang er al/ European Joumal of Medicinal Chemistry 61(2013)95-103 ADME properties are difficult to predict accurately just by in silico and so the predicted properties should be used with caution. For our study, more experiments should be done to explore the real 3. Conclusion ARG 209 SER 26 n summary, we have disclosed a novel series of BTZ compounds as non-ATP competitive GSK-3B inhibitors Based on the structure modification of the hits found from a structure-based docking screening, twenty five btz derivatives were successfully synthe- sized and the in vitro luminescent bioassay showed that about half of them can inhibit GSK-3B with ICso values in micromolar level Among them, three compounds 61, 6t and 6v have ICso values of 25.0 uM, 27.8 HM and 23.0 HM respectively. As the representative compound 6v is proved to reversibly inhibit GSK-3B as non-ATP competitive mechanism through kinetic analysis. Moreover, it almost has not shown any inhibitory activity to a whole panel of other 13 protein kinases, which to some extent suggests good Fig 4. Suggested binding mode for compound 6v in GSK-3B(PDB ID: IPYX) specificity of BIZ compounds with respect to GSK-3B. The results of our primary SAR study also remind us that the nature of BTZ moiety In potentially related to the activ and certain substituents would be important for retaining GSK-3B ore, it is hoped that the prese inhibition. The presence of both a bulky hydrophobic substituent at study of more potent Gsk-3B seem crucial to increase the inhibitory activity. Finally, the binding mode of compound 6v to a non-atP binding pocket of GSK-3B was established by molecular docking and several key interactions were Finally, the adme descriptors module available in Discovery bserved. In this binding mode the affinity seems mainly attrib- Studio(DS)3.0[23 was used to predict a range of drug-like ited to the hydrogen-bonds interaction by the carbonyl and nitro properties for the compound 6v. This protocol uses the qsar groups of inhibitor 6v with Arg 209 and Ser 236 respectively, which models and is suitable to estimate the adme related properties for let the compound more closely bind to the pocket of enzyme and small molecules. The following properties, and classes of proper- hoped that the inhibitory potency and specificity of BTZs toward ties, can be computed such as human intestinal absorption( HIA), GSK-3B shou queous solubility, blood-brain barrier penetration(BBB), cyto low them worth to further study as potenti therapeutic candidates for severe unmet human diseases where chrome P450(CYP450)2D6 inhibition and plasma protein binding. GSK-3B is up-regulated. The resulted data were listed in Table 3. It showed compound 6v might have good intestinal absorption after oral administration and nedium ability to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), but its ity predicted was not so good. In addition, 4. Experi compound 6v was likely to inhibit CYP2D6 enzyme, which belongs 4.1. Chemistry to CYP450 enzyme family. The results also showed that the binding between inhibitor and plasma protein is less than 90%, which Reagents were purchased from commercial sources and then proteins in the blood. However, it is a common experience that chromatography was carried out at medium pressure using silica Co. Ltd. All the reactions were monitored by thin layer chroma- 3 tography(TLC)on silica gel. H NMR andC NMR spectra were ADME properties of compound 6v predicted. obtained on Mercury Plus 400 spectrometers working at 400 MHz nd 100 MHz, respectively. Chemical shifts(O)are reported in parts per million(ppm) relative to internal tetramethylsilane(TMs)andJ values are reported in Hertz. MS spectra were recorded on al 00 Agilent LC-MS 1100 instrument with an ESI mass selective detector. Melting points were determined by an SGW X-4 thermometer and AlogP98 were uncorrected(slide method). Level 0 means inhibitor has good human intestinal absorption(HlA)after o 4.1.1. General procedure for the synthesis of 3-substituted acrylic eous solubility of inhibitor is not very good and its drug- A mixture of substituted carbaldehyde(200 mmol), propen dioic acid (20.8 g. 200 mmol) in a solution of pyridin e(10 ml d Level 2 means inhibitor has medium ability to cross the blood-brain barrier 120 mmol )and piperidine(1 ml)was warmed at reflux for 2 h. The e Level 1 means inhibitor likely to inhibit CYP2D6 enzyme. resultant solution was poured into 2 M HCl ag. and then cooled to f Levelo means the binding between inhibitor and plasma protein is less than 90% room temperature. The present solid was collected by filtration, (No markers flagged and Alog P98 4.0). washed with water and recrystallized from ethanol/ water
in an allosteric binding site are potentially related to the active conformation of GSK-3b. Therefore, it is hoped that the present work will be helpful for further study of more potent GSK-3b inhibitors. 2.2.6. Predicting ADME properties Finally, the ADME descriptors module available in Discovery Studio (DS) 3.0 [23] was used to predict a range of drug-like properties for the compound 6v. This protocol uses the QSAR models and is suitable to estimate the ADME related properties for small molecules. The following properties, and classes of properties, can be computed such as human intestinal absorption (HIA), aqueous solubility, bloodebrain barrier penetration (BBB), cytochrome P450 (CYP450) 2D6 inhibition and plasma protein binding. The resulted data were listed in Table 3. It showed compound 6v might have good intestinal absorption after oral administration and medium ability to cross the bloodebrain barrier (BBB), but its aqueous solubility predicted was not so good. In addition, compound 6v was likely to inhibit CYP2D6 enzyme, which belongs to CYP450 enzyme family. The results also showed that the binding between inhibitor and plasma protein is less than 90%, which means the compound is unlikely to be highly bound to carrier proteins in the blood. However, it is a common experience that ADME properties are difficult to predict accurately just by in silico and so the predicted properties should be used with caution. For our study, more experiments should be done to explore the real properties of these compounds. 3. Conclusion In summary, we have disclosed a novel series of BTZ compounds as non-ATP competitive GSK-3b inhibitors. Based on the structure modification of the hits found from a structure-based docking screening, twenty five BTZ derivatives were successfully synthesized and the in vitro luminescent bioassay showed that about half of them can inhibit GSK-3b with IC50 values in micromolar level. Among them, three compounds 6l, 6t and 6v have IC50 values of 25.0 mM, 27.8 mM and 23.0 mM respectively. As the representative, compound 6v is proved to reversibly inhibit GSK-3b as non-ATP competitive mechanism through kinetic analysis. Moreover, it almost has not shown any inhibitory activity to a whole panel of other 13 protein kinases, which to some extent suggests good specificity of BTZ compounds with respect to GSK-3b. The results of our primary SAR study also remind us that the nature of BTZ moiety and certain substituents would be important for retaining GSK-3b inhibition. The presence of both a bulky hydrophobic substituent at N5 position and an aromatic group at C2 position in BTZ scaffold seem crucial to increase the inhibitory activity. Finally, the binding mode of compound 6v to a non-ATP binding pocket of GSK-3b was established by molecular docking and several key interactions were observed. In this binding mode, the affinity seems mainly attributed to the hydrogen-bonds interaction by the carbonyl and nitro groups of inhibitor 6v with Arg 209 and Ser 236 respectively, which let the compound more closely bind to the pocket of enzyme and contributed to the inhibitory activity. According to our work, it is hoped that the inhibitory potency and specificity of BTZs toward GSK-3b should allow them worth to further study as potential therapeutic candidates for severe unmet human diseases where GSK-3b is up-regulated. 4. Experimental 4.1. Chemistry Reagents were purchased from commercial sources and then used without further purification except special case. Flash column chromatography was carried out at medium pressure using silica gel (200e300 mesh) purchased from Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Co. Ltd. All the reactions were monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel. 1 H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were obtained on Mercury Plus 400 spectrometers working at 400 MHz and 100 MHz, respectively. Chemical shifts (d) are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to internal tetramethylsilane (TMS) and J values are reported in Hertz. MS spectra were recorded on an Agilent LC-MS 1100 instrument with an ESI mass selective detector. Melting points were determined by an SGW X-4 thermometer and were uncorrected (slide method). 4.1.1. General procedure for the synthesis of 3-substituted acrylic acid A mixture of substituted carbaldehyde (200 mmol), propenedioic acid (20.8 g, 200 mmol) in a solution of pyridine (10 ml, 120 mmol) and piperidine (1 ml) was warmed at reflux for 2 h. The resultant solution was poured into 2 M HCl aq. and then cooled to room temperature. The present solid was collected by filtration, washed with water and recrystallized from ethanol/water. Fig. 4. Suggested binding mode for compound 6v in GSK-3b (PDB ID: 1PYX). Table 3 ADME properties of compound 6v predicted. Value Level Absorptiona NVb 0 Solubilityc 4.619 2 BBBd 0.06 2 CYP2D6e 0.722 1 PPBf NV 0 AlogP98f 3.733 0 a Level 0 means inhibitor has good human intestinal absorption (HIA) after oral administration. b NV means no value was given. c Level 2 means the aqueous solubility of inhibitor is not very good and its druglikeness properties are low. d Level 2 means inhibitor has medium ability to cross the bloodbrain barrier (BBB). e Level 1 means inhibitor likely to inhibit CYP2D6 enzyme. f Level 0 means the binding between inhibitor and plasma protein is less than 90% (No markers flagged and AlogP98 < 4.0). P. Zhang et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61 (2013) 95e103 99
P Zhang et aL/ European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61(2013)95-103 4.1.1.1. 3-(2-thienyl)acrylic acid (4a). Yield: 85%: mp 158.2- 4.1.2.6. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenmyl-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5HF-one (5n) 596°c(itmp153-154°c[24]) Yield: 25%: mp 177.6-1799C: H NMR(400 MHz, CDCl3)8.30 bd,1H).742-717(m,9H.487-491(m,1H);294-2.79(m.2H) 142.7.C ESI-MS(positive): 256. 1(M+1). 4.1.2.7. 2,3-Dihydro-2-benzyl-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (5g) 4.1.1.3.3-(3-Pyridyl)acrylic acid (4e) Yield: 92%: mp 231.6- Yield: 24% mp 1382-141.3.C: H NMR(400 MHz, CDC13)68.25- 2345c( lit. mp233°c[26]) 59(m9H.4.12-3.85(m,1H).3.72(q,J=7.0Hz,1H),3.14-2.76 m,2H).2.58(dd,J=124,5.7Hz,1H),239(d,J=12588Hz,1H) 411.3- Phenylacrylic acid(4D.Yeld:91%;mp1346-1357c(it1cNMR(1o0MHz,CDCl3)6172.3.1411.1379,1361.130.1294 mp132-133[26]) 1285,126.8,126.6,1264,1230,510,43.4,38.6;ES|-Ms( positive) 270.1(M+1) 4.1.1.5.3-Benzylacrylic acid (4g) Yield: 566; mp 632-64. C(lit. 4.1.2.8. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)- p64-65°[27] one(5h) Yield: 30%: mp 182.9-184.0 oC: H NMR(400 MHz, CDcl)b888(s,1H,793-6.54(m8H)489(d,J=104.6.1Hz, 4.1.1.6.3-(4-Fluorophenyl)acrylic acid (4h). Yield: 88%: mp 205.8- 1H), 3.15-2.53(m, 2H): ESI-MS (positive): 274.1(M+ 1) 4.1.2.9. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-1, 5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)- 4.1.1.7. 3-(4-Chlorophenyl)acrylic acid(4i). Yield: 95%: mp 247.1- one(5i). Yield: 28%: mp 205 4-2079C: H NMR(400 MHZ, CDCl3) 250.5°c(lt.mp248°[29] 8.55(br,1H),7.87-6.80(m8H,506-465(m,1H)310-2.52(m, 2H): ESI-MS(positive ): 289.9(M+1)*. 4.1.1.8. 3-(4-Bromophenyl)acrylic acid(4j). Yield: 85%: mp 255.9- 2576c(itmp253°c[29]) DMSO-d6)b846(br,1H,7.85-683(m,8H,501(dd,J=10 2 5.6 Hz, 1H). 2.63(ddd J=39. 2, 27.9, 19.5 Hz, 2H). ESI-Ms(positive) 3340,3360(M+1) A mixture of 3-substituted-acrylic acid (106 mmol),2- aminobenzenetiol (13.3 g. 106 mmol)and 4 A molecular sieve 4.1.3. General procedure for the synthesis of 2,3-dihydro-2,5 vas heated at 180C under nitrogen atmosphere for 6 h, then disubstituted-1, 5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one cetonitrile(80 ml)was added and the solution was cooled to room A mixture of 2, 3-dihydro-2-substituted-1,5-benzothiazepin- temperature. The resultant solid was collected by filtration and 4(5H)-one(2 mmol)and 80% NaH (0. 18 g, 6 mmol)in anhydrous shed with acetonitrile DMF (8 ml)were stirred at-10Cfor 0.5 h Then alkyl/ acyl chloride (1.2 mmol) was added and the mixture was kept under stirring 4.1.2.1. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(2-thienyl)-1, 5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one at -10oC for 1-20 h. The reaction was quenched by saturated (5a) Yield: 66% mp 172.6-173. 4C: H NMR(400 MHz, CDCl3) aqueous NHCl and the product was extracted by ethyl acetate 8767-7.14(m, 5H). 6.96-691(m, 2H), 5.16(dd, J=5.8 Hz, 11.0 Hz, washed with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4 and then sub- 1H,297-281(m,2H).ES-Ms( positive):2620(M+1) jected to flash chromatograph 4.1.22.2,3- Dihydro-2-(2 4.1.3.1. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-(2-thienyl)-5-ethyl-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)- Yield:60%; mp 162.7-1636C: H NMR(400 MHz, CDCl3)68.19 one(6a) Yield: 65%; mp 1046-105.6.C: H NMR(400 MHz, (bs,1H,759-.15(m5H.6.30(dJ=12H1H.6.16(dJ=31Hz,cDCl3)796-6.53(m,7H,5.0(dJ=125.54Hz,1H,433(d 1H,493(dd,J=63Hz110Hz,1H)293-282(m,2H).ESl-MsJ=142.72Hz,1H).3.56(dq,J=140.70Hz.1H).307-244(m (positive ): 246.1(M+1). 2H), 1.20(dt, J= 14.2, 10.5 Hz, 3H). C NMR(100 MHz, CDCl3) 61699,1478,1461,1369,130.6,1271,1267,124.5,1243.1235 4.1.2.3. 2, 3-Dihydro-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)one(5c). Yield: 31%: 48.5, 43.9, 42.9, 12.9: ESI-MS(positive ) 2900(M+ 1)+. mp2143-2168°C:HNMR(400 MHZ. CDCI3)783(s,1H),762- 758d,J=14Hz1H),738-734(m,1hH,7.19-715(m1H),711-4.32.2,3- Dihydro-2-(2- thiene 15-benzoth 708(J=79Hz,1H.347-343(m2H)265-261(m,2H)ES-45HN6764-74(m.5H.688(d,J=35.51Hz,1H.679d MS(positive ) 1801(M +1)t. J=3Hz,1H,506(d,J=5.5Hz,125Hz,1H).490(m,1H),286 4.1.2.4. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-methyl-1, 5-benzothiazepin-4(5H-one (5d). (m, 1H), 2.63-2.57(m, 1H), 1.45(d, J= 6.7 Hz, 3H), 1.05(d Yed:51%:mp209-2125c:HNMR(400 MHz, CDCI3)6783(s,J=67Hz,3H:1cNMR(100MHz,CDCl3)b169:8,147.1446 1H,7.65-7.52(m,1H,742-730(m,1H.7.21-715(m,H).714-1371,130.1,1281.1277,127.5.126.7.126.5,1260.124.5,123.5,49.3 704(m,1H,392-381(m1H,272-258(m1H)240-226(m48.1.43.3.22.7,200:ESMS( positive:3041(M+1)+ 1H.148-139(d,J=66Hz,3H). ESI-MS( positive:1941(M+1)+. 4.1.3.3. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(2-thienyl)-5-n-butyl-1, 5-benzothiazepin (5e)Yed:25%;mp1882-1903°c;HNMR(400 MHz, CDCI)cDcl3)b7.91-647(m,7H.513(d,J=126,54Hz,1H)424(dd 6871(bs,1H).8.51(dd,J=1.5Hz,5.0Hz,1H),846(d,J=15Hz,J=136,84Hz,1H)331(dd,J=136.60Hz,1H,304-252(m, H,756(d.J=75Hz,1H)732(d,J=80Hz,1H,725-719(m,2H,213-1.58(m,H).122(s,1H,100(d,J=10.9.67H,2H) 2H),7:05(td,J=1.5,8.0Hz,lH,6.88(dJ=1.0Hz80Hz,1H,084(t.J=80Hz,3H) C NMR(100MHz,CDa1)b1700.1479 364(dd,J=5.5Hz,9.5Hz1H,3.31(d,J=5.0Hz,140Hz,1H)1464,137.2,130.5,1268,1267,1245,123.9,1235,55.3,509,48.5 287(ddJ=95Hz140Hz1H)ESMs( positive2571(M+1).431.277,20.7.20.7; ESI-MS( positive):3181(M+1)+
4.1.1.1. 3-(2-thienyl)acrylic acid (4a). Yield: 85%; mp 158.2e 159.6 C (lit. mp 153e154 C [24]). 4.1.1.2. 3-(2-Furyl)acrylic acid (4b). Yield: 69%; mp 138.3e142.7 C (lit. mp 141e143 C [25]). 4.1.1.3. 3-(3-Pyridyl)acrylic acid (4e). Yield: 92%; mp 231.6e 234.5 C (lit. mp 233 C [26]). 4.1.1.4. 3-Phenylacrylic acid (4f). Yield: 91%; mp 134.6e135.7 C (lit. mp 132e133 C [26]). 4.1.1.5. 3-Benzylacrylic acid (4g). Yield: 56%; mp 63.2e64.6 C (lit. mp 64e65 C [27]). 4.1.1.6. 3-(4-Fluorophenyl)acrylic acid (4h). Yield: 88%; mp 205.8e 207.4 C (lit. mp 209e210 C [28]). 4.1.1.7. 3-(4-Chlorophenyl)acrylic acid (4i). Yield: 95%; mp 247.1e 250.5 C (lit. mp 248 C [29]). 4.1.1.8. 3-(4-Bromophenyl)acrylic acid (4j). Yield: 85%; mp 255.9e 257.6 C (lit. mp 253 C [29]). 4.1.2. General procedure for the synthesis of 2,3-dihydro-2- substituted-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one A mixture of 3-substituted-acrylic acid (106 mmol), 2- aminobenzenetiol (13.3 g, 106 mmol) and 4 A molecular sieve was heated at 180 C under nitrogen atmosphere for 6 h, then acetonitrile (80 ml) was added and the solution was cooled to room temperature. The resultant solid was collected by filtration and washed with acetonitrile. 4.1.2.1. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(2-thienyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (5a). Yield: 66%; mp 172.6e173.4 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.67e7.14 (m, 5H), 6.96e6.91 (m, 2H), 5.16 (dd, J ¼ 5.8 Hz, 11.0 Hz, 1H), 2.97e2.81 (m, 2H). ESI-MS (positive): 262.0 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.2.2. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(2-furyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (5b). Yield: 60%; mp 162.7e163.6 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.19 (bs, 1H), 7.59e7.15 (m, 5H), 6.30 (d, J ¼ 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.16 (d, J ¼ 3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.93 (dd, J ¼ 6.3 Hz, 11.0 Hz, 1H), 2.93e2.82 (m, 2H). ESI-MS (positive): 246.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.2.3. 2,3-Dihydro-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (5c). Yield: 31%; mp 214.3e216.8 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.83 (s, 1H), 7.62e 7.58 (d, J ¼ 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.38e7.34 (m, 1H), 7.19e7.15 (m, 1H), 7.11e 7.08 (d, J ¼ 7.9 Hz, 1H), 3.47e3.43 (m, 2H), 2.65e2.61 (m, 2H). ESIMS (positive): 180.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.2.4. 2,3-Dihydro-2-methyl-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (5d). Yield: 51%; mp 209.1e212.5 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.83 (s, 1H), 7.65e7.52 (m, 1H), 7.42e7.30 (m, 1H), 7.21e7.15 (m, 1H), 7.14e 7.04 (m, 1H), 3.92e3.81 (m, 1H), 2.72e2.58 (m, 1H), 2.40e2.26 (m, 1H), 1.48e1.39 (d, J ¼ 6.6 Hz, 3H). ESI-MS (positive): 194.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.2.5. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(3-pyridyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (5e). Yield: 25%; mp 188.2e190.3 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.71 (bs, 1H), 8.51 (dd, J ¼ 1.5 Hz, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 8.46 (d, J ¼ 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.25e7.19 (m, 2H), 7.05 (td, J ¼ 1.5, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.88 (dd, J ¼ 1.0 Hz, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (dd, J ¼ 5.5 Hz, 9.5 Hz, 1H), 3.31 (dd, J ¼ 5.0 Hz, 14.0 Hz, 1H), 2.87 (dd, J ¼ 9.5 Hz, 14.0 Hz, 1H). ESI-MS (positive): 257.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.2.6. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (5f). Yield: 25%; mp 177.6e179.9 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.30 (bd, 1H), 7.42e7.17 (m, 9H), 4.87e4.91 (m, 1H); 2.94e2.79 (m, 2H); ESI-MS (positive): 256.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.2.7. 2,3-Dihydro-2-benzyl-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (5g). Yield: 24%; mp 138.2e141.3 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.25e 5.99 (m, 9H), 4.12e3.85 (m, 1H), 3.72 (q, J ¼ 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.14e2.76 (m, 2H), 2.58 (dd, J ¼ 12.4, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 2.39 (dd, J ¼ 12.5, 8.8 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 172.3, 141.4, 137.9, 136.1, 130.0, 129.4, 128.5, 126.8, 126.6, 126.4, 123.0, 51.0, 43.4, 38.6; ESI-MS (positive): 270.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.2.8. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(4-fluorophenyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)- one (5h). Yield: 30%; mp 182.9e184.0 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.88 (s, 1H), 7.93e6.54 (m, 8H), 4.89 (dd, J ¼ 10.4, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 3.15e2.53 (m, 2H); ESI-MS (positive): 274.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.2.9. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)- one (5i). Yield: 28%; mp 205.4e207.9 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.55 (br, 1H), 7.87e6.80 (m, 8H), 5.06e4.65 (m, 1H), 3.10e2.52 (m, 2H); ESI-MS (positive): 289.9 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.2.10. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(4-bromophenyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)- one (5j). Yield: 32%; mp 169.2e170.8 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) d 8.46 (br, 1H), 7.85e6.83 (m, 8H), 5.01 (dd, J ¼ 10.7, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (ddd, J ¼ 39.2, 27.9, 19.5 Hz, 2H). ESI-MS (positive): 334.0, 336.0 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3. General procedure for the synthesis of 2,3-dihydro-2,5- disubstituted-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one A mixture of 2,3-dihydro-2-substituted-1,5-benzothiazepin- 4(5H)-one (2 mmol) and 80% NaH (0.18 g, 6 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (8 ml) were stirred at 10 C for 0.5 h. Then alkyl/acyl chloride (1.2 mmol) was added and the mixture was kept under stirring at 10 C for 1e20 h. The reaction was quenched by saturated aqueous NH4Cl and the product was extracted by ethyl acetate, washed with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4 and then subjected to flash chromatograph. 4.1.3.1. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(2-thienyl)-5-ethyl-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)- one (6a). Yield: 65%; mp 104.6e105.6 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.96e6.53 (m, 7H), 5.10 (dd, J ¼ 12.5, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 4.33 (dq, J ¼ 14.2, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 3.56 (dq, J ¼ 14.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.07e2.44 (m, 2H), 1.20 (dt, J ¼ 14.2, 10.5 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 169.9, 147.8, 146.1, 136.9, 130.6, 127.1, 126.7, 124.5, 124.3, 123.5, 48.5, 43.9, 42.9, 12.9; ESI-MS (positive): 290.0 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.2. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(2-thienyl)-5-isopropyl-1,5-benzothiazepin- 4(5H)-one (6b). Yield: 50%; mp 76.1e78.8 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.64e7.14 (m, 5H), 6.88 (dd, J ¼ 3.5, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (d, J ¼ 3.1 Hz, 1H), 5.06 (dd, J ¼ 5.5 Hz, 12.5 Hz, 1H), 4.90 (m, 1H), 2.86 (m, 1H), 2.63e2.57 (m, 1H), 1.45 (d, J ¼ 6.7 Hz, 3H), 1.05 (d, J ¼ 6.7 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 169.8, 147.7, 144.6, 137.1, 130.1, 128.1, 127.7, 127.5, 126.7, 126.5, 126.0, 124.5, 123.5, 49.3, 48.1, 43.3, 22.7, 20.0; ESI-MS (positive): 304.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.3. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(2-thienyl)-5-n-butyl-1,5-benzothiazepin- 4(5H)-one (6c). Yield: 62%; mp 83.9e84.6 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.91e6.47 (m, 7H), 5.13 (dd, J ¼ 12.6, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 4.24 (dd, J ¼ 13.6, 8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.31 (dd, J ¼ 13.6, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 3.04e2.52 (m, 2H), 2.13e1.58 (m, 1H), 1.22 (s, 1H), 1.00 (dd, J ¼ 10.9, 6.7 Hz, 2H), 0.84 (t, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.0, 147.9, 146.4, 137.2, 130.5, 126.8, 126.7, 124.5, 123.9, 123.5, 55.3, 50.9, 48.5, 43.1, 27.7, 20.7, 20.7; ESI-MS (positive): 318.1 (M þ 1)þ. 100 P. Zhang et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61 (2013) 95e103
P Zhang er al/ European Joumal of Medicinal Chemistry 61(2013)95-103 4.1.3.4. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-(2-thienyl)-5-cyclohexthylmethyl-1,5-4.1.3.12. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(2-nitrobenzyl)-1, 5-benzothiazepin- benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one(6d). Yield: 15%; mp 142.5-1432C H 4(5H)-one(6I). Yield: 75%: mp 186.7-1895C:H NMR(400 MHZ, NMR(100MHz,CDCl3)61706,158.8,1461,1439,136.5,130.1,145.8,1436,1368,133.7,1327,130.7,1296,1288,1280,1278,1274 1294,129.1,128.7,1276,127.5,127.1,1261,1242,552,529.511,1271,1261,1250.1234,529.50.9,49.5,421,29.7;ESl-Ms( positive) 508,421,29.7;ES|Ms( positive):3581(M+1)+ 3909(M+1) 4.1.3.5. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-(2-thienyl)-5-benzoyl-1.5-benzothiazepin- 4.1.3.13. 23-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(2-cyanobenzyl-1, 5-benzothiazepin 4(5H)-one(6e). Yield: 89%6: mp 234.8-2356C: H NMR (400 MH 4(5H)-one(6m) Yield: 88%; mp 148.6-1498: H NMR(400 MHZ. CDCh)b826-6.58(m,12H),5.12(dd,J=11.61Hz,1H.3.01(ddd.cDl)b802-696(m.13H)256(d,J=160H,1H),512(d, 1432,1376,1343,133.1.1309,129.6,1286,1285,1269.1266,9.1H2H;CNMR(100MHz,CDl3)61707,1454,1436,138.3 1250,1242,474,43.5:ESMS( positive):366.1(M+1)+ 1368.1326,1316,131.1,1305,1292,1288,1278,127.6,1260,1239 1187,1124.528,511,41.8,31.9,29.7;ESMs( positive)}3708 4.1.3.6. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(2-thienyl)-5-benzyl-1, 5-benzothiazepin-(M+1) 4(5H)-one(6f). Yield: 86% mp 143.7-1451C:H NMR(400 MHz CDCl3)8758-7.15(m, 10H). 6.90-6.88(m, 1H), 5.99(d, J=3.5 HZ, 4.1.3.14. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(2-flurobenzyl)-1, 5-benzothiazepin H519(d,J=149Hz,1H.5.4(m,1H).501(d,J=149Hz1H).4(5H)-one(6m) Yield:87%;mp1432-1464C:HNMR(400MHz 300(m,1H),285-279(m,1H):1CNMR(100 MHZ. CDCI3)b1701.cDC3)796-657(m,13H,550-495(m,2H),485(d,J=126 1477.14613731370134,13081305,1293,1284,1280,127.3.55H,1H)312-262(m,2H):1CNMR(1o0MHz,CDCl3)d1708, 1271,1267,126.5,1246,123.9,1236.585,51.8,485,429;ESI-MS145.9,143.9,136.5,130.3,130.31,130.27,129.00.128.92,128.76, (positive ) 3521(M+1). 127.69,127.30.127.24,12608,124.13,124.09,12395,123.91,123.76, 11513.11491,5282,44.90.4486,4201.ESMS( positive):3641 4.1.3.7. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(2-furyl)-5-benzyl-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-(M+ 1). one(6g). Yield: 75% mp 1049-1057C: H NMR(400 MHz, CDCl3) 8 7.47-7.14(m, 10H), 6.26(, 1H), 5.99(d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.17(d, 4.1.3.15. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-2-chlorobenzyl) -1,5-benzothiazepin 153H,H.501(dJ=153Hz1H),489(ddJ=59,126Hz,1H.4(5H)one(6o)Yeld:100%;mp1693-1725c;HNMR(400MHz 292-281(m,2H:1CNMR(100 MHz. CDCl3)617041549.1461.CD3)b799-666(m,13H.526(5,2H),489d,J=128,52Hz 1422.137.0,13601303,1284,128012731270,1267,1238,110.3.1H),318-2,74(m,2H;1CMMR(100MHz,CDl3)61709,1460 1053.585,518,459,388;ESl-Ms( positive):336.1(M+1)+ 1438.136.6,1343,1328,130.4,129.3,1290,1288,1284,127.8,1273, 1271,1261,124.5,1236,529.509,49.3,421,297;ESl-Ms( positive) 4.1.3.8. 2, 3-Dihydro-5-benzyl-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (6h). 380.0(M+ 1). Yield:787%;mp1047-1058c:HNMR(400 MHZ. CDC13)6757- 7.55(d, =1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.35-7.19(m, 7H), 7. 16-7.13(m, 1H), 5.18- 4.1.3.16. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-2-bromobenzyl-1, 5-benzothiazepin- 498(m,2H),3.5-3.3(m,2H,27-25(m,2H:1CNMR(100MHz,4(5H)one(6p)Yeld:71%;mp1686-1704°c;HNMR(400MHz CDCl3)d1720,1464,1372,1359,1299,1283,1282,1279,127.2,CDCl)6791-666(m,13H)524(d,J=46Hz,2H.4.91(s1H,293 124.51.8.34.5,34.2;ES-Ms( positive):270.1(M+1) (dd, J=26.2, 8.9 Hz, 2H): C NMR(100 MHZ, CDC13)6170.8. 146.1 1438,1366.1359,1326,1304,129.0,1288,128.7,1278,127.6,127 4.1.3.9. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-methyl-5-benzyl-1, 5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)- 127.1, 126. 1, 123.6, 122.8, 52.9, 51.9, 42.1, 31.4, 29.7: ESI-MS(positive) one(6)Yeld:79.5%;mp115.6-1179°:HNMR(400MHz,4240.4264(M+1)+ CDCl)76-748(dJ=74Hz,1H),741-718(m,7H),718-7.07(m 1H). 5.16-5.06(d, J= 15.3 Hz, 1H), 5.06-4.88(d, J= 15.3 Hz, 1H). 4.1.3.17. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(2-methylbenzyl-1, 5-benzothiazepin- 390-355(m,1H).270-2.55(m,1H,2.36-217(m,1H).132-1,264(5H)-one6q)Yeld:85%;mp1332-1346c:HNMR(400MHz (d,J=66Hz,3H);cNMR(100MHz,CDC2)1714,1463,1372 CDCl3)785-671(m,13H.510(dd,J=632.15.9Hz,2H.487(dd, 136.8,1354,130.4,129.8.128.3,128.0,127.6.1272,1268,123.8,51.7, 12.7.5.1Hz,1H),3.10-2.74(m.2H)2.33(5,3H); 451,42.5,24.3;ES-MS(〔 positive):284.2(M+1)+. 100MHz,CD3)6170.6.1464.1440.1365.135.7,1348,1303.1301, 1288.1277,127.3,127.2,1271,1261,1260,1239.585,529,49.7,422 4.1.3. 10. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-(3-pyridyl)-5-benzyl-1,5-benzothiaze 193,184:ESMs( positive3601(M+1)+ 4(5H)-one(6j). Yield: 60%: mp 178.9-1802C: H NMR(400 MH CDCI3)88.52(d, J=4.7 Hz, 1H), 8.43(5, 1H). 7.57(dd, J=2.0 Hz, 4.1.3.18. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-phenmy-5-4-methoxylbenzyl) -1,5-benzothiazepin 78Hz,1H.7.35-700(m,10H,5.32(d,J=160Hz,1H.5.16(d,4(5H)one(6r)Yed:60%;mp1108-1131°;HNMR(400MHz J=16.0Hz,H,3.71(dd,J=5,9.8Hz,1H,3.36(dd,J=5.1,dcb)6807-650(m.7H.5.12(d,J=126,54Hz1H)423(dd 141Hz,1H,2.86(dd,J=9.8,145HzH);1cNMR(100MHz.J=137,78H1H).375(s3H331(ddJ=137.58Hz1H307-246 CDCl3)6165,1504.1482,139.2.137.1366,1329,1291,1288.(m,2H):1CNMR(100MHCD)b1700,1479.1466,1372.1305 1275,127.3,126.2,1240.1234,121.2,1179,489,44.8,320;ES-MS127.0.1267,1266,1265,124.5,1239,123.5,546,509,489,485,431, (positive): 347.2(M+1)*. 37.0, 31.2: ESI-MS(positive): 3761(M+1)+. 4.1.3.11. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-benzyl-1, 5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-.1.3.19. 23-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-3-carboxylbenzyl-1, 5-benzothiazepin ne(6k) Yield: 89%: mp 146.7-1506C: H NMR(400 MHz, -4(5H-one(6s). A solution of 6m(0. 2 g, 0.54 mmol)in conc. HCI(5 ml) CDCl3)8758-7. 14(m, 14H), 5.23(d,J=15.2 Hz), 1H, 5.01(d, was reflux in a sealed tube at 100Cfor 7 h, and then cooled to room J= 15.2 Hz, 1H), 4.88-4.83(m, 1H), 2.94-2.82(m, 2H): C NMR temperature. The pale-yellow precipitate was collected by filtration and (100MHz,CD3)61707.1462.,144.0,1371.1366,1302.128.8. washed with methanol, yield:.70%mp1864-1887c;HNMR 1284,1280.127.7,127.3,127.2,126.1,1241.529,51.8.421;ESMS(400MHz, DMSO-d6)61289(s,1H),788(s,1H).7.74(d.J=76Hz1H) (positive ): 346. 1(M +1). 762-7.16(m11H.544(d,=156H,1H.44(d,J=156Hz,1H,498
4.1.3.4. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(2-thienyl)-5-cyclohexthylmethyl-1,5- benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (6d). Yield: 15%; mp 142.5e143.2 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.84e6.52 (m, 7H), 5.23 (d, J ¼ 15.0 Hz, 1H), 5.08e4.70 (m, 2H), 3.10e2.60 (m, 2H), 1.98e1.08 (m, 11H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.6, 158.8, 146.1, 143.9, 136.5, 130.1, 129.4, 129.1, 128.7, 127.6, 127.5, 127.1, 126.1, 124.2, 55.2, 52.9, 51.1, 50.8, 42.1, 29.7; ESI-MS (positive): 358.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.5. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(2-thienyl)-5-benzoyl-1,5-benzothiazepin- 4(5H)-one (6e). Yield: 89%; mp 234.8e235.6 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.26e6.58 (m, 12H), 5.12 (dd, J ¼ 11.1, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 3.01 (ddd, J ¼ 23.5, 12.3, 8.7 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 172.3, 170.3, 143.2, 137.6, 134.3, 133.1, 130.9, 129.6, 128.6, 128.5, 126.9, 126.6, 125.0, 124.2, 47.4, 43.5; ESI-MS (positive): 366.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.6. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(2-thienyl)-5-benzyl-1,5-benzothiazepin- 4(5H)-one (6f). Yield: 86%; mp 143.7e145.1 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.58e7.15 (m, 10H), 6.90e6.88 (m, 1H), 5.99 (d, J ¼ 3.5 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (d, J ¼ 14.9 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (m, 1H), 5.01 (d, J ¼ 14.9 Hz, 1H), 3.00 (m, 1H), 2.85e2.79 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.1, 147.7, 146.1, 137.1, 137.0, 133.4, 130.8, 130.5, 129.3, 128.4, 128.0, 127.3, 127.1, 126.7, 126.5, 124.6, 123.9, 123.6, 58.5, 51.8, 48.5, 42.9; ESI-MS (positive): 352.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.7. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(2-furyl)-5-benzyl-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)- one (6g). Yield: 75%; mp 104.9e105.7 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.47e7.14 (m, 10H), 6.26 (s, 1H), 5.99 (d, J ¼ 2.4 Hz, 1H), 5.17 (d, J ¼ 15.3 Hz,1H), 5.01 (d, J ¼ 15.3 Hz,1H), 4.89 (dd, J ¼ 5.9,12.6 Hz,1H), 2.92e2.81 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.4, 154.9, 146.1, 142.2,137.0, 136.0, 130.3, 128.4,128.0, 127.3, 127.0, 126.7,123.8,110.3, 105.3, 58.5, 51.8, 45.9, 38.8; ESI-MS (positive): 336.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.8. 2,3-Dihydro-5-benzyl-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (6h). Yield: 78.7%; mp 104.7e105.8 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.57e 7.55 (d, J ¼ 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.35e7.19 (m, 7H), 7.16e7.13 (m, 1H), 5.18e 4.98 (m, 2H), 3.5e3.3 (m, 2H), 2.7e2.5 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 172.0, 146.4, 137.2, 135.9, 129.9, 128.3, 128.2, 127.9, 127.2, 124.1, 51.8, 34.5, 34.2; ESI-MS (positive): 270.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.9. 2,3-Dihydro-2-methyl-5-benzyl-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)- one (6i). Yield: 79.5%; mp 115.6e117.9 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.6e7.48 (d, J ¼ 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.41e7.18 (m, 7H), 7.18e7.07 (m, 1H), 5.16e5.06 (d, J ¼ 15.3 Hz, 1H), 5.06e4.88 (d, J ¼ 15.3 Hz, 1H), 3.90e3.55 (m, 1H), 2.70e2.55 (m, 1H), 2.36e2.17 (m, 1H), 1.32e1.26 (d, J ¼ 6.6 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 171.4, 146.3, 137.2, 136.8, 135.4, 130.4, 129.8, 128.3, 128.0, 127.6, 127.2, 126.8, 123.8, 51.7, 45.1, 42.5, 24.3; ESI-MS (positive): 284.2 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.10. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(3-pyridyl)-5-benzyl-1,5-benzothiazepin- 4(5H)-one (6j). Yield: 60%; mp 178.9e180.2 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.52 (d, J ¼ 4.7 Hz, 1H), 8.43 (s, 1H), 7.57 (dd, J ¼ 2.0 Hz, 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.35e7.00 (m, 10H), 5.32 (d, J ¼ 16.0 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (d, J ¼ 16.0 Hz, 1H), 3.71 (dd, J ¼ 5.1, 9.8 Hz, 1H), 3.36 (dd, J ¼ 5.1, 14.1 Hz, 1H), 2.86 (dd, J ¼ 9.8, 14.5 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 166.5, 150.4, 148.2, 139.2, 137.1, 136.6, 132.9, 129.1, 128.8, 127.5, 127.3, 126.2, 124.0, 123.4, 121.2, 117.9, 48.9, 44.8, 32.0; ESI-MS (positive): 347.2 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.11. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-benzyl-1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)- one (6k). Yield: 89%; mp 146.7e150.6 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.58e7.14 (m, 14H), 5.23 (d, J ¼ 15.2 Hz), 1H, 5.01 (d, J ¼ 15.2 Hz, 1H), 4.88e4.83 (m, 1H), 2.94e2.82 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.7, 146.2, 144.0, 137.1, 136.6, 130.2, 128.8, 128.4, 128.0, 127.7, 127.3, 127.2, 126.1, 124.1, 52.9, 51.8, 42.1; ESI-MS (positive): 346.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.12. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(2-nitrobenzyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin- 4(5H)-one (6l). Yield: 75%; mp 186.7e189.5 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.24e6.88 (m, 13H), 5.54 (d, J ¼ 25.7 Hz, 2H), 5.06e4.73 (m, 1H), 3.15e2.74 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 171.0, 148.1, 145.8, 143.6, 136.8, 133.7, 132.7, 130.7, 129.6, 128.8, 128.0, 127.8, 127.4, 127.1, 126.1, 125.0, 123.4, 52.9, 50.9, 49.5, 42.1, 29.7; ESI-MS (positive): 390.9 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.13. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(2-cyanobenzyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin- 4(5H)-one (6m). Yield: 88%; mp 148.6e149.8; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.02e6.96 (m, 13H), 5.69 (d, J ¼ 16.0 Hz, 1H), 5.12 (d, J ¼ 16.0 Hz, 1H), 4.87 (dd, J ¼ 12.6, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 2.90 (dd, J ¼ 15.9, 9.1 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.7, 145.4, 143.6, 138.3, 136.8, 132.6, 131.6, 131.1, 130.5, 129.2, 128.8, 127.8, 127.6, 126.0, 123.9, 118.7, 112.4, 52.8, 51.1, 41.8, 31.9, 29.7; ESI-MS (positive): 370.8 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.14. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(2-flurobenzyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin- 4(5H)-one (6n). Yield: 87%; mp 143.2e146.4 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.96e6.57 (m, 13H), 5.50e4.95 (m, 2H), 4.85 (dd, J ¼ 12.6, 5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.12e2.62 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.8, 145.9, 143.9, 136.5, 130.3, 130.31, 130.27, 129.00, 128.92, 128.76, 127.69, 127.30, 127.24, 126.08, 124.13, 124.09, 123.95, 123.91, 123.76, 115.13, 114.91, 52.82, 44.90, 44.86, 42.01. ESI-MS (positive): 364.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.15. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(2-chlorobenzyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin- 4(5H)-one (6o). Yield: 100%; mp 169.3e172.5 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.99e6.66 (m, 13H), 5.26 (s, 2H), 4.89 (dd, J ¼ 12.8, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 3.18e2.74 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.9, 146.0, 143.8, 136.6, 134.3, 132.8, 130.4, 129.3, 129.0, 128.8, 128.4, 127.8, 127.3, 127.1, 126.1, 124.5, 123.6, 52.9, 50.9, 49.3, 42.1, 29.7; ESI-MS (positive): 380.0 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.16. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(2-bromobenzyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin- 4(5H)-one (6p). Yield: 71%; mp 168.6e170.4 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.91e6.66 (m, 13H), 5.24 (d, J ¼ 4.6 Hz, 2H), 4.91 (s, 1H), 2.93 (dd, J ¼ 26.2, 8.9 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.8, 146.1, 143.8, 136.6, 135.9, 132.6, 130.4, 129.0, 128.8, 128.7, 127.8, 127.6, 127.2, 127.1, 126.1, 123.6, 122.8, 52.9, 51.9, 42.1, 31.4, 29.7; ESI-MS (positive): 424.0, 426.4 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.17. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(2-methylbenzyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin- 4(5H)-one (6q). Yield: 85%; mp 133.2e134.6 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.85e6.71 (m, 13H), 5.10 (dd, J ¼ 63.2, 15.9 Hz, 2H), 4.87 (dd, J ¼ 12.7, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 3.10e2.74 (m, 2H), 2.33 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.6, 146.4, 144.0, 136.5, 135.7, 134.8, 130.3, 130.1, 128.8, 127.7, 127.3, 127.2, 127.1, 126.1, 126.0, 123.9, 58.5, 52.9, 49.7, 42.2, 19.3, 18.4; ESI-MS (positive): 360.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.18. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(4-methoxylbenzyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin -4(5H)-one (6r). Yield: 60%; mp 110.8e113.1 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.07e6.50 (m, 7H), 5.12 (dd, J ¼ 12.6, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (dd, J ¼ 13.7, 7.8 Hz,1H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 3.31 (dd, J ¼ 13.7, 5.8 Hz,1H), 3.07e2.46 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.0, 147.9, 146.6, 137.2, 130.5, 127.0, 126.7, 126.6, 126.5, 124.5, 123.9, 123.5, 54.6, 50.9, 48.9, 48.5, 43.1, 37.0, 31.2; ESI-MS (positive): 376.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.19. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(3-carboxylbenzyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin -4(5H)-one (6s). A solution of 6m (0.2 g, 0.54 mmol) in conc. HCl (5 ml) was reflux in a sealed tube at 100 C for 7 h, and then cooled to room temperature. The pale-yellow precipitatewas collected byfiltration and washed with methanol, yield: 70%, mp 186.4e188.7 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) d 12.89 (s, 1H), 7.88 (s, 1H), 7.74 (d, J ¼ 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.62e7.16 (m,11H), 5.44 (d, J¼ 15.6 Hz,1H), 4.94 (d, J¼ 15.6 Hz,1H), 4.98 P. Zhang et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61 (2013) 95e103 101
P Zhang et aL/ European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61(2013)95-103 (m, 1H). 2.86-267(m, 2H). C NMR(100 MHz, DMSO-d6)6 170.3, (Dundee, UK). The prephosphorylated polypeptide substrate GS-2 167.6, 145.7, 144.3, 138.2, 136.6, 132.6, 1312, 129.1, 129. 1. 128.9, 128.5, was synthesized by GL Biochem Ltd (Shanghai, China). Kinase-Glo 128.0, 127.6, 126.7, 126.5, 1248, 52.3, 50.3, 41.7: ESI-MS(positive ): 390. 1 Luminescent Kinase Assay(catalog number V6713)was obtained (M+1)+ from Promega Corporation(Madison, WI). ATP 2Na was purchased from Roche. TDZD-8(catalog number 098K4602V)was supplied by 4.1.3.20. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(3-carbomethoxybenzyl)-1. 5- Sigma-Aldrich(St. Louis, MO) Assay buffer contained 50 mM benzothiazepin- 4(5H)-one(6t). To a solution of 6s(0.04 g, 0. 1 mmol) HEPES (pH 7.5). 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, and 15 mM magnesium in methanol (2 ml) was added SoCl2(0.1 ml) dropwise at0Cunder acetate. Glow-type luminescence was recorded by Fluoroskan N2 and the reaction mixture was stirred under reflux for 2 h. Then the Ascent Fl (Thermo Electron, US). mixture was cooled to room temperature. After the organic solvent was evaporated, the residue was purified by chromatography 4.2. 1. Inhibition of GsK-3B (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate/methanol 15: 5.5: 0.6) to give pale- The measurement of GSK-3B inhibition was performed in assay yellow solid, Yield: 89%6; mp 110.9-1122C: H NMR (400 MHz, buffer using black 96-well plates according to the Kinase-Glo assay CDCI)8798(s, 1H). 7.92(d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.60(d, J=6.4 Hz, 2H), method of Baki [20. In a typical assay, 4 Lof interest compound with 7.46-7.16(m, 9H), 5.41(d, J=15.2 Hz, 1H), 5.00(d, J= 15.2 Hz, 1H), different concentration(dissolved in DMSO)was diluted by 14 uL of 4.89(dd,=5.6Hz, 12.4 Hz, 1H),3.91(s, 3H).2.98-2.86(m, 2H);c assay buffer, and 2 uL(20 ng)of enzyme solution were added to each NMR(100 MHZ, CDCI3)8 170.8, 167.0, 145.8, 143.9, 137.4, 136.7, 132.6, well followed by 20 uL of assay buffer containing 12.5 HM substrate 60.3, 130.2, 129.0, 128.8, 128.6, 128.6, 127.7, 127.5, 1273, 126. 1. 124.0, and 4 HM ATP. After 30 min of incubation at 30oC, the enzymatic 529,521,514420:ESMS( positive):4042(M+1)+ reaction was stopped with 40 uL of Kinase-Glo reagent. Glow-type luminescence was recorded after 10 min. The activity is propor- 4.1.3.21. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(2-(3-chlorophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)- tional to the difference of the total and consumed ATP. The inhibitory 1, 5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one(6u). Yield: 65%: mp 60.2-63.9 C: activities were calculated on the basis of maximal activities measured H NMR(400 MHZ, CDCl3)68.01(t,J=1.6 Hz, 1H). 7.91(d, in the absence of inhibitor. The ICso value was defined as the J=7.8 Hz, 1H). 7.65-716(m, 11H), 5.76(d, 17.6 Hz, 1H). 4.61(d, concentration of each compound that reduces 50% the enzymatic Iz, 1H). 4.82(dd, J=5.1 Hz, 12.9 Hz, 1H), 3.05-283(m, 2H): activity with respect to that without inhibitors 13cNMR(100 MHz, CDCl3)d1928,1705,1467,1438,1365,1363 1352,1338,130.6,130.2.1288,1284,127.8,127.5,127.0,126.3,422. Kinetic analysis on GSK-38 1261.1237,559,528,416;ESMS( positive):4081(M+1)+ The protocol of the whole kinetic experiments was much to the one of GSK-3B inhibition tests. The activities of compound 6v 4. 22. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-benzyl-5-(2-nitrobenzyl)-1, 5-benzothiazepin- were measured separately at its two different concentrations as 4 (5H-one( 6v) Yield: 95%: mp 135.0-1369C: H NMR(400 MHz, 25 HM and 50 HM. In the experiments for testing the relationship CDCl)88.37-6.55(m, 12H), 5.86-4.86(m, 2H). 4. 26-3.62(m, 1H). between 6v and ATP, the concentration of substrate GS-2 was kept 2.69(dddd, J=111.3, 95.2, 19.1, 9.8 Hz, 4H): CNMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) unchanged at 6. 25 HM, while the concentration of ATP was set at 61717,1480.1461,1382,1378,1371,1359,1336,133.0,1328,1305,0.5μM,1pM,2pM,4 HM and8 uM separately.Then, in the 129.6, 129.3, 128.5. 1279, 127. 1, 126.8, 126.4, 124.9, 123. 2, 51.2, 49.4, following experiments for testing the relationship between 6v and 441,403,373: ESI-MS( positive)}4052(M+1) GS-2, the concentration of ATP was kept unchanged at 2 uM while GS-2 concentration was set at 0.78 HM, 1.56 HM, 3. 13 HM, 6.25 AM 4.1.3.23. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-(2-nitrobenzyl-1, 5- and 12.5 uM separately. Double-reciprocal plotting of the data was enzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (6w). Yield: 91%: mp 166.5-1688C:H depicted in Fig3 NMR(400MHz,CDCl3)68.37-655(m,12H).5.53(q,J=173H Reversibility of compound 6v was determined by evaluating its 2H). 4.88(dd, J= 12.7, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 3. 13-2.46(m, 2H): C NMr activity to the enzyme at different incubation time. The incubation (100 MHz, CDCl3)8 170.7, 148. 1. 145.8 139.5, 136.8, 133.6, 132.9, time was set at 0 min, 5 min and 10 min while concentration of 130.8,130.0.129,.1288.128.1,127.7,126.8,125.0.1246,123.5, compound6 v was kept unchanged at12.5 HM and25 uM sepa- rately. The inhibition effects of compound 6v in these conditions were shown in Fig 3C. 4. 24. 2, 3-Dihydro-2-(chlorophenyl)-5-(2-nitrobenzyl)-1.5- benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one(6x). Yield: 88%: mp 164.8-1674C:H 4.2.3. Selectivity studies of tyrosine kinases inhibition NMR(400MHz,CDCl3)b8.29-6.77(m,12H.5.53(q,J=172Hz The experimental procedures for the inhibition of nine tyrosine 2H). 4.85(dd, J= 12.7, 5.4 Hz, 1H). 3.15-2.69(m, 2H): C NMR kinases were conducted using ELISA method reported by Geng et al. (100MHz,CDCl)6170.6,148.1,145.8.1421,136.8,1336,1326,[30]20μg/ ml of Poly(Gu,Tyr)4:1( Sigma) was pre- coated as 130.9.129.6,129.0.128.1,1275.1274.1267,125.0.123.5.52.2,49.4, a substrate in96- well plates.50μLof10 M ATP solution diluted 41.9: ESI-MS(positive ) 4250(M+1). with kinase reaction buffer (50 mM HEPES PH 7.4, 50 mM MgCl2. 0.5 mM MnCl, 0. 2 mM Na3VO4 and 1 mM DTT) was added to each 4.1.3.25. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(bromophenyl)-5-(2-nitrobenzyl)-1, 5- well. Various concentrations of compounds diluted in 10 uL of 1% benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one(6y). Yield: 93%: mp 178.0-1815C:H DMsO(v/v)were added to each reaction well, with 1% DMso (v/v) NMR(400 MHZ, CDCI3)88.38-6.78(m, 12H), 5.53(q,= 17.2 Hz, used as the negative control. The kinase reaction was initiated by 2H). 4.84(dd, J=12.7, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 3. 29-2.60(m, 2H): C NMR the addition of purified tyrosine kinase proteins diluted with 40 HL (100 MHz, CDCI3)8 170.6, 148. 1, 145.8, 142. 1, 136.8, 133.6, 132.6, of kinase reaction buffer solution. After incubation for 60 min at 130.9, 129.6, 129.0, 128. 1, 127.5, 127.4, 126.7, 125.0, 123.5, 52.2, 49.4, 37oC, the plate was washed three times with Phosphate Buffered 49:ES-Ms( positive):4690.4710(M+1) Saline(pbs)containing 0. 1% Tween 20(T-PBS). Next, 100 uL of anti phospho tyrosine(PY99 )antibody(1: 500 diluted in 5 mg/mL BSA 4. 2. Biological evaluation T-PBS)was added After 30 min incubation at 37 .C, the plate was washed three times. A solution of 100 uL of horseradish peroxidase- Human recombinant glycogen synthase kinase-3B(catalog conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG(1: 2000 diluted in 5 mg/mL BSAT- number 14-306)was purchased from Millipore Corporation PBS)was added. The plate was reincubated at 37C for 30 min, and
(m, 1H), 2.86e2.67 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) d 170.3, 167.6, 145.7, 144.3, 138.2, 136.6, 132.6, 131.2, 129.1, 129.1, 128.9, 128.5, 128.0,127.6,126.7,126.5,124.8, 52.3, 50.3, 41.7; ESI-MS (positive): 390.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.20. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(3-carbomethoxybenzyl)-1,5- benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (6t). To a solution of 6s (0.04 g, 0.1 mmol) in methanol (2 ml) was added SOCl2 (0.1 ml) dropwise at 0 C under N2 and the reaction mixture was stirred under reflux for 2 h. Then the mixture was cooled to room temperature. After the organic solvent was evaporated, the residue was purified by chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate/methanol 15:5.5:0.6) to give paleyellow solid, Yield: 89%; mp 110.9e112.2 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.98 (s, 1H), 7.92 (d, J ¼ 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (d, J ¼ 6.4 Hz, 2H), 7.46e7.16 (m, 9H), 5.41 (d, J ¼ 15.2 Hz, 1H), 5.00 (d, J ¼ 15.2 Hz, 1H), 4.89 (dd, J ¼ 5.6 Hz, 12.4 Hz, 1H), 3.91 (s, 3H), 2.98e2.86 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.8, 167.0, 145.8, 143.9, 137.4, 136.7, 132.6, 130.3, 130.2, 129.0, 128.8, 128.6, 128.6, 127.7, 127.5, 127.3, 126.1, 124.0, 52.9, 52.1, 51.4, 42.0; ESI-MS (positive): 404.2 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.21. 2,3-Dihydro-2-phenyl-5-(2-(3-chlorophenyl)-2-oxoethyl)- 1,5-benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (6u). Yield: 65%; mp 60.2e63.9 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.01 (t, J ¼ 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d, J ¼ 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.65e7.16 (m, 11H), 5.76 (d, J ¼ 17.6 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (d, J ¼ 17.6 Hz, 1H), 4.82 (dd, J ¼ 5.1 Hz, 12.9 Hz, 1H), 3.05e2.83 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 192.8, 170.5, 146.7, 143.8, 136.5, 136.3, 135.2, 133.8, 130.6, 130.2, 128.8, 128.4, 127.8, 127.5, 127.0, 126.3, 126.1, 123.7, 55.9, 52.8, 41.6; ESI-MS (positive): 408.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.22. 2,3-Dihydro-2-benzyl-5-(2-nitrobenzyl)-1,5-benzothiazepin- 4(5H)-one (6v). Yield: 95%; mp 135.0e136.9 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.37e6.55 (m, 12H), 5.86e4.86 (m, 2H), 4.26e3.62 (m, 1H), 2.69 (dddd, J ¼ 111.3, 95.2, 19.1, 9.8 Hz, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 171.7, 148.0, 146.1, 138.2, 137.8, 137.1, 135.9, 133.6, 133.0, 132.8, 130.5, 129.6, 129.3, 128.5, 127.9, 127.1, 126.8, 126.4, 124.9, 123.2, 51.2, 49.4, 44.1, 40.3, 37.3; ESI-MS (positive): 405.2 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.23. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(4-fluorophenyl)-5-(2-nitrobenzyl)-1,5- benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (6w). Yield: 91%; mp 166.5e168.8 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.37e6.55 (m, 12H), 5.53 (q, J ¼ 17.3 Hz, 2H), 4.88 (dd, J ¼ 12.7, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 3.13e2.46 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.7, 148.1, 145.8, 139.5, 136.8, 133.6, 132.9, 130.8, 130.0, 129.1, 128.8, 128.1, 127.7, 126.8, 125.0, 124.6, 123.5, 115.6, 52.2, 49.4, 42.2; ESI-MS (positive): 409.1 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.24. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(chlorophenyl)-5-(2-nitrobenzyl)-1,5- benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (6x). Yield: 88%; mp 164.8e167.4 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.29e6.77 (m, 12H), 5.53 (q, J ¼ 17.2 Hz, 2H), 4.85 (dd, J ¼ 12.7, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 3.15e2.69 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.6, 148.1, 145.8, 142.1, 136.8, 133.6, 132.6, 130.9, 129.6, 129.0, 128.1, 127.5, 127.4, 126.7, 125.0, 123.5, 52.2, 49.4, 41.9; ESI-MS (positive): 425.0 (M þ 1)þ. 4.1.3.25. 2,3-Dihydro-2-(bromophenyl)-5-(2-nitrobenzyl)-1,5- benzothiazepin-4(5H)-one (6y). Yield: 93%; mp 178.0e181.5 C; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d 8.38e6.78 (m, 12H), 5.53 (q, J ¼ 17.2 Hz, 2H), 4.84 (dd, J ¼ 12.7, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 3.29e2.60 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) d 170.6, 148.1, 145.8, 142.1, 136.8, 133.6, 132.6, 130.9, 129.6, 129.0, 128.1, 127.5, 127.4, 126.7, 125.0, 123.5, 52.2, 49.4, 41.9; ESI-MS (positive): 469.0, 471.0 (M þ 1)þ. 4.2. Biological evaluation Human recombinant glycogen synthase kinase-3b (catalog number 14e306) was purchased from Millipore Corporation (Dundee, UK). The prephosphorylated polypeptide substrate GS-2 was synthesized by GL Biochem Ltd (Shanghai, China). Kinase-Glo Luminescent Kinase Assay (catalog number V6713) was obtained from Promega Corporation (Madison, WI). ATP$2Na was purchased from Roche. TDZD-8 (catalog number 098K4602V) was supplied by SigmaeAldrich (St. Louis, MO). Assay buffer contained 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, and 15 mM magnesium acetate. Glow-type luminescence was recorded by Fluoroskan Ascent Fl (Thermo Electron, US). 4.2.1. Inhibition of GSK-3b The measurement of GSK-3b inhibition was performed in assay buffer using black 96-well plates according to the Kinase-Glo assay method of Baki[20]. In a typical assay, 4 mL of interest compound with different concentration (dissolved in DMSO) was diluted by 14 mL of assay buffer, and 2 mL (20 ng) of enzyme solution were added to each well followed by 20 mL of assay buffer containing 12.5 mM substrate and 4 mM ATP. After 30 min of incubation at 30 C, the enzymatic reaction was stopped with 40 mL of Kinase-Glo reagent. Glow-type luminescence was recorded after 10 min. The activity is proportional to the difference of the total and consumed ATP. The inhibitory activities were calculated on the basis of maximal activities measured in the absence of inhibitor. The IC50 value was defined as the concentration of each compound that reduces 50% the enzymatic activity with respect to that without inhibitors. 4.2.2. Kinetic analysis on GSK-3b The protocol of the whole kinetic experiments was much similar to the one of GSK-3b inhibition tests. The activities of compound 6v were measured separately at its two different concentrations as 25 mM and 50 mM. In the experiments for testing the relationship between 6v and ATP, the concentration of substrate GS-2 was kept unchanged at 6.25 mM, while the concentration of ATP was set at 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 2 mM, 4 mM and 8 mM separately. Then, in the following experiments for testing the relationship between 6v and GS-2, the concentration of ATP was kept unchanged at 2 mM while GS-2 concentration was set at 0.78 mM, 1.56 mM, 3.13 mM, 6.25 mM and 12.5 mM separately. Double-reciprocal plotting of the data was depicted in Fig. 3. Reversibility of compound 6v was determined by evaluating its activity to the enzyme at different incubation time. The incubation time was set at 0 min, 5 min and 10 min while concentration of compound 6v was kept unchanged at 12.5 mM and 25 mM separately. The inhibition effects of compound 6v in these conditions were shown in Fig. 3C. 4.2.3. Selectivity studies of tyrosine kinases inhibition The experimental procedures for the inhibition of nine tyrosine kinases were conducted using ELISA method reported by Geng et al. [30]. 20 mg/ml of Poly (Glu, Tyr) 4:1 (Sigma) was pre-coated as a substrate in 96-well plates. 50 mL of 10 mM ATP solution diluted with kinase reaction buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 50 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM MnCl2, 0.2 mM Na3VO4 and 1 mM DTT) was added to each well. Various concentrations of compounds diluted in 10 mL of 1% DMSO (v/v) were added to each reaction well, with 1% DMSO (v/v) used as the negative control. The kinase reaction was initiated by the addition of purified tyrosine kinase proteins diluted with 40 mL of kinase reaction buffer solution. After incubation for 60 min at 37 C, the plate was washed three times with Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) containing 0.1% Tween 20 (T-PBS). Next, 100 mL of antiphospho tyrosine (PY99) antibody (1:500 diluted in 5 mg/mL BSA T-PBS) was added. After 30 min incubation at 37 C, the plate was washed three times. A solution of 100 mL of horseradish peroxidaseconjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:2000 diluted in 5 mg/mL BSA TPBS) was added. The plate was reincubated at 37 C for 30 min, and 102 P. Zhang et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61 (2013) 95e103
P Zhang er al/ European Joumal of Medicinal Chemistry 61(2013)95-10 washed as before. Finally, 100 HL of a solution containing 0.03% References H202 and 2 mg/mL O-phenylenediamine in 0.1 mM citrate buffer. [1 P. Cohen, D. Yellowlees, A. A. Donella-Deana, B.A. Hemmings, ture until color emerged. The reaction was terminated by the ddition of 50 HL of 2 M H2S04, and the plate was read using a multi 11(2010)539-551 well spectrophotometer(VERSA maxTM, Molecular Devices, Sun- 14A. Sudher Babu, V.N. Balaji, Expert Opin Ther. Targets yale, CA, USA)at 490 nm. The inhibition rate(%)was calculated [51 D. Alonso, A Martinez, Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3(GSK-3)and Its Inhibitors, using the following equation: [1-(A490A490 control )x 100% howley Sons N.USA2006,pp.307-331 [6] A Martinez, C. Gil. Alzheimers Dis.2011(2011)280502. 图ma 28(2008)773-796. 4.3. Molecular modeling per, G K Smith, K Schneider, J Med. Chem. nan, A. Licht-Murava, S. Pietrokovski, M. Eisenstein, Biochim. The gSK-3B protein-ligand complex crystal structure(PDB IPYX)was chosen as the template for docking analysis, which was [101 A. Martinez, M. Alonso, A Castro, C. Perez, F Moreno, J. Med. Chem. 4. 2002)1292-1299 6.9 with the MMFF94 force field until a 0.01 kcal/mol gradient was reached For enzyme preparation, the hydrogen atoms were added, [13] D.L. Perez, S. Conde, C. Perez, C. Gil, D. Simon, L Gelpi, F Luque, A Martinez, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 17(2009)6914-6925 and all of ligands, metal, water, and cocrystallized phosphates were [14] D 1. Perez, V Palomo, C.P. rez, C. Gil, P D Dans, F.J. Luque onde, A martinez removed. The binding as defined as a sphere of 10 A radius Aed.chem54(2011)4042-4056. around the residue Arg 209. Docking calculations were performed [16jM. Hamann, D. Alonso, E. Martin-Aparicio, A Fuertes, Ml Perez-Puerto, docking complex were extracted for conformational cluster analysis Prod. 70 2007 139,-1405 varro, M. del Mlonte-Millan, M. Medina. J. Nat. in order to find the docking results with the highest probabili [17 JC Lancelot, B. Letois, C. Saturnono, P. De Caprariis, M. Robba, Org. Prep. [18] A Levai, H Duddeck, Pharmazie 38(1983)827-828. S.F. Wnuk, S.M. Chowdhury, P L. Garcia Jr, M.L. Robins, ] Org Chem. 67(2002) 6-1819 [20] A. Baki, A. Bielik, L Molnar, G Szendrei, G M. Keseru, Assay Drug Dev. TechnoL e ully acknowledge the financial support by speci [211Gold.Version5.0,TheCambridgeCrystallographicDataCentrehttp://www. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China(Grant No. 20070246089), the Shanghai Committee of [ V Palomo, L Soteras, Dd Perez, C Perez, C. Gill, NE Campillo, A Martinez. Science and Technology of China(Grant No. 10ZR1401800), and ThanksareduetoProfessorJianzhongLu(departMentofPhar-/24/nccelrYs.com National Drug Innovative Program(Grant No. 2009ZX09301-011) Mouelhi, M. Bellassoued, Synth. Commun. 31(2001)1007-1011 assoued, N. Lensen, M. Bakasse, S. Mouelhi, J. Org. Chem. 63(1998 E.R. Spitzmiller, C.F. Turk, Med Chem. 6 (1963)544-546 Nesmeyanov, LI. Zakharkin, R Kh Freidlina, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 111 Medica) for assistance with the bioassay and biological evaluation Appendix A. Supplementary data hardt, S Dove, M. Zabel, S Elz, R Seifert, A Buschauer, ] Med Chem. (2008)7193-7204. Supplementary data related to this article can be found at [30] YWa http://dx.doinorg/10.1016j.ejmech.2012.09.021. [31] Sybyl Version 6.9, Triops Inc, St. Louis, MO
washed as before. Finally, 100 mL of a solution containing 0.03% H2O2 and 2 mg/mL o-phenylenediamine in 0.1 mM citrate buffer, pH 5.5, was added and samples were incubated at room temperature until color emerged. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 50 mL of 2 M H2SO4, and the plate was read using a multi well spectrophotometer (VERSA max, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) at 490 nm. The inhibition rate (%) was calculated using the following equation: [1(A490/A490 control)] 100%. 4.3. Molecular modeling The GSK-3b proteineligand complex crystal structure (PDB ID: 1PYX) was chosen as the template for docking analysis, which was proceeded using GOLD 5.0 software. For ligand preparation, the structure of compound 6v was generated and minimized using Sybyl 6.9 with the MMFF94 force field until a 0.01 kcal/mol gradient was reached. For enzyme preparation, the hydrogen atoms were added, and all of ligands, metal, water, and cocrystallized phosphates were removed. The binding site was defined as a sphere of 10 A radius around the residue Arg 209. Docking calculations were performed with other parameters set in their default values. Top five scored docking complex were extracted for conformational cluster analysis in order to find the docking results with the highest probability. Acknowledgments We gratefully acknowledge the financial support by Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant No. 20070246089), the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology of China (Grant No.10ZR1401800), and National Drug Innovative Program (Grant No. 2009ZX09301-011). Thanks are due to Professor Jianzhong Lu (Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University) and to Professor Meiyu Geng (Division of Antitumor Pharmacology, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica) for assistance with the bioassay and biological evaluation. Appendix A. Supplementary data Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.09.021. References [1] P. Cohen, D. Yellowlees, A. Aitken, A. Donella-Deana, B.A. Hemmings, P.J. Parker, Eur. J. Biochem. 124 (1982) 21e35. [2] J.R. Woodgett, Sci. STKE 100 (2001) 12. [3] E.M. Hur, F.Q. Zhou, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11 (2010) 539e551. [4] A. Kannoji, S. Phukan, V. Sudher Babu, V.N. Balaji, Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 12 (2008) 1443e1455. [5] D. Alonso, A. Martinez, Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 (GSK-3) and Its Inhibitors, JohnWiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006, pp. 307e331. [6] A. Martinez, C. Gil, D.I. Perez, Int. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2011 (2011) 280502. [7] A. Martinez, Med. Res. Rev. 28 (2008) 773e796. [8] P. Bamborough, D. Drewry, G. Harper, G.K. Smith, K. Schneider, J. Med. Chem. 51 (2008) 7898e7914. [9] H. Eldar-Finkelman, A. Licht-Murava, S. Pietrokovski, M. Eisenstein, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804 (2010) 598e603. [10] A. Martinez, M. Alonso, A. Castro, C. Pérez, F.J. Moreno, J. Med. Chem. 45 (2002) 1292e1299. [11] T. del Ser, Alzheimer’s Dementia 6 (2010) S147. [12] S. Conde, D.I. Pérez, A. Martínez, C. Perez, F.J. Moreno, J. Med. Chem. 46 (2003) 4631e4633. [13] D.I. Perez, S. Conde, C. Pérez, C. Gil, D. Simon, F. Wandosell, F.J. Moreno, J.L. Gelpí, F.J. Luque, A. Martínez, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 17 (2009) 6914e6925. [14] D.I. Perez, V. Palomo, C.P. rez, C. Gil, P.D. Dans, F.J. Luque, S. Conde, A. Martinez, J. Med. Chem. 54 (2011) 4042e4056. [15] H. Eldar-Finkelman, M. Eisenstein, Curr. Pharm. Des. 15 (2009) 2463e2470. [16] M. Hamann, D. Alonso, E. Martín-Aparicio, A. Fuertes, M.J. Pérez-Puerto, A. Castro, S. Morales, M.L. Navarro, M. del Monte-Millán, M. Medina, J. Nat. Prod. 70 (2007) 1397e1405. [17] J.C. Lancelot, B. Letois, C. Saturnono, P. De Caprariis, M. Robba, Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 24 (1992) 204e208. [18] A. Levai, H. Duddeck, Pharmazie 38 (1983) 827e828. [19] S.F. Wnuk, S.M. Chowdhury, P.I. Garcia Jr., M.J. Robins, J. Org. Chem. 67 (2002) 1816e1819. [20] A. Baki, A. Bielik, L. Molnar, G. Szendrei, G.M. Keseru, Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 5 (2007) 75e83. [21] GOLD, Version 5.0, The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, http://www. ccdc.cam.ac.uk. [22] V. Palomo, I. Soteras, D.I. Perez, C. Perez, C. Gil, N.E. Campillo, A. Martinez, J. Med. Chem. 54 (2011) 8461e8470. [23] Discovery Studio, Version 3.0, Accelrys Software Inc., http://www. accelrys.com. [24] N. Lensen, S. Mouelhi, M. Bellassoued, Synth. Commun. 31 (2001) 1007e1011. [25] M. Bellassoued, N. Lensen, M. Bakasse, S. Mouelhi, J. Org. Chem. 63 (1998) 8785e8789. [26] J. Krapcho, E.R. Spitzmiller, C.F. Turk, J. Med. Chem. 6 (1963) 544e546. [27] A.N. Nesmeyanov, L.I. Zakharkin, R. Kh Freidlina, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 111 (1956) 114e116. [28] A. Lebedev, A. Lebedeva, V. Sheludyakov, E. Kovaleva, O. Ustinova, I. Kozhevnikov, Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 75 (2005) 1113e1124. [29] P. Ghorai, A. Kraus, M. Keller, C. Gotte, P. Igel, E. Schneider, D. Schnell, G.n. Bernhardt, S. Dove, M. Zabel, S. Elz, R. Seifert, A. Buschauer, J. Med. Chem. 51 (2008) 7193e7204. [30] Y. Wang, J. Ai, Y. Chen, L. Wang, G. Liu, M. Geng, A. Zhang, J. Med. Chem. 54 (2011) 2127e2142. [31] Sybyl Version 6.9, Triops Inc, St. Louis, MO. P. Zhang et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 61 (2013) 95e103 103