政治经济学经典导读 Lecture 2 MODERN STATE AND MODERN ECONOMY 上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院 黄琪轩 sjtuhuangqixuan@gmail.com
政治经济学经典导读 Lecture 2 MODERN STATE AND MODERN ECONOMY 上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院 黄琪轩 sjtuhuangqixuan@gmail.com
本周阅读 ·梯利：《发动战争与缔造国家类似于有组 织的犯罪》 答疑时间：上半期周一14：00一15：30 ● 下半期周二14：00一15：30 ·答疑地点：交大闵行校区老行政楼6楼610
本周阅读 • 梯利：《发动战争与缔造国家类似于有组 织的犯罪》 • 答疑时间：上半期 周一 14:00—15:30 • 下半期 周二 14:00—15:30 • 答疑地点：交大闵行校区老行政楼6楼610
1,Causes of War: experimentation ·Q1.Choose between A.An 80%chance to lose $4.000 B.A certain loss of $3,000 ● Q 2.Assume yourself richer by $300 than you are today.You are offered a choice between ·A.A sure gain of$100 B.A 50%chance to gain $200 and a 50% chance to gain nothing
1,Causes of War: experimentation • Q1. Choose between • A. An 80% chance to lose $4,000 • B. A certain loss of $3,000 • • Q 2. Assume yourself richer by $300 than you are today. You are offered a choice between • A. A sure gain of $100 • B. A 50% chance to gain $200 and a 50% chance to gain nothing
1,Causes of War: experimentation Q3.Assume yourself richer by $500 than you are today.You are offered a choice between ·A.A sure loss of$100 B.A 50%chance to lose $200 and a 50% chance to lose nothing Loss Aversion [Source:Tversky and Kahneman,1986]
1,Causes of War: experimentation • Q3. Assume yourself richer by $500 than you are today. You are offered a choice between • A. A sure loss of $100 • B. A 50% chance to lose $200 and a 50% chance to lose nothing Loss Aversion • [Source: Tversky and Kahneman, 1986]
2.War:Good or Bad? Debate:Is war good or bad for economic growth? Affirmative Side:War is good for economic growth. Negative Side:War is bad for economic growth
2, War: Good or Bad? • Debate: Is war good or bad for economic growth? • Affirmative Side: War is good for economic growth. • Negative Side: War is bad for economic growth
2,War:Good or Bad? 。Preparation One group is affirmative sides; Another group is the negative sides. Each group have 2 minutes to discuss
2, War: Good or Bad? • Preparation • One group is affirmative sides; • Another group is the negative sides. • Each group have 2 minutes to discuss
3.War Making and State Making Why do states Exist at all? A.Institutional economics: States exist because they are needed to solve various transaction costs. B,Classical political Theory (Hobbes,Locke, etc): Contractual approach.People "demand' authority for sake of security
3. War Making and State Making Why do States Exist at all? A, Institutional economics: – States exist because they are needed to solve various transaction costs. B, Classical political Theory (Hobbes, Locke, etc): – Contractual approach. People “demand” authority for sake of security
3.War Making and State Making States as organized crime: Tilly,Olson,others Roving bandits>stationary bandit Some degree of consent (implicit contract) Protection implies means to ability to ensure the peace
3. War Making and State Making States as organized crime: – Tilly, Olson, others – Roving bandits stationary bandit • Some degree of consent (implicit contract) • Protection implies means to ability to ensure the peace
3.War Making and State Making 。State activities: ·1)war making: eliminate external rivals to their sovereignty C7702F581/80050200
3. War Making and State Making • State activities: • 1) war making: eliminate external rivals to their sovereignty
3.War Making and State Making 与产阶极革命造 累 毛主席语录 授欲：爱 至元立一这就段 帝国主义和左界上 一切反的派过待一 民事业的现到。山 日次不会背这小 塑峰的
3. War Making and State Making