《英语教学》（英文版）Western Blotting

Molecular Biology Problem Solver: A Laboratory Guide. Edited by Alan S Gerstein ISBNS:0-471-37972-7( Paper);0-471 (Electronic) 3 Western Blotting Peter riis Physical Properties of Proteins What do you know about your protein? ..374 What Other Physical Properties Make Your Protein Unusual? ..374 Choosing a Detection Strategy: Overview of Detection Sys 375 What Are the Criteria for Selecting a Detection Method ..377 What Are the Keys to Obtaining High-Quality Results?.. 379 Which Transfer Membrane Is Most Appropriate to our needs Blocking 380 Which Blocking Agent Best Meets Your Needs? Washing ..382 What Composition of Wash Buffer Should You Use? What Are Common Blot Size, Format, and Handling The Primary Antibody Are All Antibodies Suitable for Blotting? How Should antibodies be handled and stored ..384 econdary reagents∴ Secondary Reagent g How Im Is sp Why Are Some Secondary Antibodies Offered as F(ab)2 Amplification ..387 373

373 13 Western Blotting Peter Riis Physical Properties of Proteins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 374 What Do You Know about Your Protein? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 374 What Other Physical Properties Make Your Protein Unusual? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 374 Choosing a Detection Strategy: Overview of Detection Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375 What Are the Criteria for Selecting a Detection Method? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377 What Are the Keys to Obtaining High-Quality Results? . . . 379 Which Transfer Membrane Is Most Appropriate to Your Needs? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379 Blocking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 Which Blocking Agent Best Meets Your Needs? . . . . . . . . . . 381 Washing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 What Composition of Wash Buffer Should You Use? . . . . . 382 What Are Common Blot Size, Format, and Handling Techniques? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 The Primary Antibody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383 Are All Antibodies Suitable for Blotting? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383 How Should Antibodies Be Handled and Stored? . . . . . . . . 384 Secondary Reagents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384 How Important Is Species Specificity in Secondary Reagents? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385 Why Are Some Secondary Antibodies Offered as F(ab’)2 Fragments? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385 Amplification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387 Molecular Biology Problem Solver: A Laboratory Guide. Edited by Alan S. Gerstein Copyright © 2001 by Wiley-Liss, Inc. ISBNs: 0-471-37972-7 (Paper); 0-471-22390-5 (Electronic)

Will the Stripping Procedure Affect the Target Protein ..388 Stripping and Reprobing Can the Same Stripping Protocols Be Used for Membranes from different manufacturers? Is It Always Necessary to Strip a Blot before Troubleshooting 389 Setting Up a New Method Bibliography 397 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF PROTEINS What Do You know about Your protein? In order to make informed choices among the bewildering range of available transfer and detection methods, it is best to have as clear an idea as possible of your own particular requirements. In large part these choices will depend on the nature of your target protein Even limited knowledge can be used to advantage How abundant is your protein? It isnt necessary to answer the question in rigorously quantitative terms: an educated guess is suf ficient. Are your samples easy to obtain and plentiful, or limited and precious? Is the sample likely to be rich in target protein(e. g, if the protein is overexpressed)or poor in target(perhaps a cytokine)? Obviously low protein concentration or severely limited sample size would require a more sensitive detection method What is the molecular weight of your target protein? Low MW proteins(12kDa or less) are retained less efficiently than higher molecular weight proteins. Membranes with a pore size of 0.1 or 0.2 micron are recommended for transfer of these smaller pro teins, and PVDF will tend to retain more low Mw protein than nitrocellulose. The ultimate lower limit for transfer is somewhere around 5kDa, although this depends largely on the proteins shape and charge The transfer of high molecular weight proteins(more than 100kDa)can benefit from the addition of up to 0. 1% SDs to the transfer buffer(Lissilour and Godinot, 1990). Transfer time can also be increased to ensure efficient transfer of high molecular ight proteins. What Other Physical Properties Make Your Protein unusual? In cases where proteins are highly basic(where the pl of the protein is higher than the pH of the transfer buffer) the protein 374 Riis

Stripping and Reprobing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388 Will the Stripping Procedure Affect the Target Protein? . . . 388 Can the Same Stripping Protocols Be Used for Membranes from Different Manufacturers? . . . . . . . . . . . 389 Is It Always Necessary to Strip a Blot before Reprobing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389 Troubleshooting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389 Setting Up a New Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 396 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF PROTEINS What Do You Know about Your Protein? In order to make informed choices among the bewildering range of available transfer and detection methods, it is best to have as clear an idea as possible of your own particular requirements. In large part these choices will depend on the nature of your target protein. Even limited knowledge can be used to advantage. How abundant is your protein? It isn’t necessary to answer the question in rigorously quantitative terms: an educated guess is suf- ficient.Are your samples easy to obtain and plentiful,or limited and precious? Is the sample likely to be rich in target protein (e.g., if the protein is overexpressed) or poor in target (perhaps a cytokine)? Obviously low protein concentration or severely limited sample size would require a more sensitive detection method. What is the molecular weight of your target protein? Low MW proteins (12kDa or less) are retained less efficiently than higher molecular weight proteins. Membranes with a pore size of 0.1 or 0.2 micron are recommended for transfer of these smaller pro￾teins, and PVDF will tend to retain more low MW protein than nitrocellulose. The ultimate lower limit for transfer is somewhere around 5kDa, although this depends largely on the protein’s shape and charge. The transfer of high molecular weight proteins (more than 100kDa) can benefit from the addition of up to 0.1% SDS to the transfer buffer (Lissilour and Godinot, 1990). Transfer time can also be increased to ensure efficient transfer of high molecular weight proteins. What Other Physical Properties Make Your Protein Unusual? In cases where proteins are highly basic (where the pI of the protein is higher than the pH of the transfer buffer) the protein 374 Riis

will not be carried toward the anode, since transfer takes place on the basis of charge. In these cases it is best to include SDs in the transfer buffer. Alternatively, the transfer sandwich can be assem bled with membranes on both sides of the gel CHOOSING A DETECTION STRATEGY OVERVIEW OF DETECTION SYSTEMS Detection systems range from the simplest colorimetric systems for use on the benchtop to complex instrument-based systems Table 13. 1). The simplest is radioactive detection: a secondary reagent is labeled with a radioactive isotope, usually the low- energy gamma-emitter iodine-125. After the blot is incubated with the primary antibody, the labeled secondary rotein A, but it can be a secondary antibody) is applied, the blot Table 13.1 Comparison of Detection Methods Method Features Limitations Radioactive Can quantitate Use of radioactive lpg material can be densitometry; difficult and expensive obe bl requ no enzymatic licensing radiat training Colorimetric Easy to perform; Relatively 200pg hard cop entitiy results directly on blot. for facilities and equipment Chemiluminescent Highly sensitive; Requires careful l pg(luminol) an quantitate optimization using film 0.1 pg(acridan) metry, Fluorescent Good linear ange for stringent data stored membrane digit d possible but difficult Western blotting 375

will not be carried toward the anode, since transfer takes place on the basis of charge. In these cases it is best to include SDS in the transfer buffer. Alternatively, the transfer sandwich can be assem￾bled with membranes on both sides of the gel. CHOOSING A DETECTION STRATEGY: OVERVIEW OF DETECTION SYSTEMS Detection systems range from the simplest colorimetric systems for use on the benchtop to complex instrument-based systems (Table 13.1). The simplest is radioactive detection: a secondary reagent is labeled with a radioactive isotope, usually the low￾energy gamma-emitter iodine-125.After the blot is incubated with the primary antibody, the labeled secondary reagent (usually Protein A, but it can be a secondary antibody) is applied, the blot Western Blotting 375 Table 13.1 Comparison of Detection Methods Method Features Limitations Sensitivity Radioactive Can quantitate Use of radioactive 1 pg through film material can be densitometry; difficult and can strip and expensive; reprobe blots; requires no enzymatic licensing and development radiation safety step training Colorimetric Easy to perform; Relatively 200 pg hard copy insensitive results directly on blot; minimal requirements for facilities and equipment Chemiluminescent Highly sensitive; Requires careful 1 pg (luminol) can quantitate optimization using film 0.1 pg (acridan) densitometry; can strip and reprobe Fluorescent Good linear Equipment 1 pg range for expensive; quantitation; stringent data stored membrane digitally requirements; stripping and reprobing possible but difficult

washed and exposed to film for hours or days. Radioactive blots can more quickly be detected using storage phosphor plates instead of film; the plates are read on a specialized scanning instru- ment. detailed discussions about the features and benefits of detection by film and scanners are included in Chapter 14, Nucleic Acid Hybridization to indicate the presence of bound antibody The simplest st Enzymatic reactions are used in a number of different systems enzymatic detection is chromogenic. Here the secondary reagent is conjugated to an enzyme, either horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or alkaline phosphatase(AP). After incubation with the sec- ondary reagent and washing, the blot is incubated with a substrate. The enzyme catalyzes a reaction in which the substrate is con- verted to a colored precipitate directly on the membrane, essen tially coloring the band on which the primary antibody has bound While not as sensitive as other methods colorimetric detection is fast and simple, and requires no special facilities. Chemiluminescent detection combines characteristics of both radioactive and chromogenic detection. Again, an enzyme label is used(commonly HRP, but there are systems for use with AP as well), but in this case the reaction produces light rather than a colored product as a result of reaction. The light is usually cap tured on X-ray film, just like a radioactive blot. Specialized imaging equipment for chemiluminescent blots is also available Chemiluminescent detection is very sensitive, and the blots are easily stripped for subsequent reprobing There are significant differences in the various available chemi luminescent detection systems. The most widely used are the luminol-based HRP systems. These typically emit usable signals for an hour or two. There are also newer, higher-sensitivity HRP- based systems that emit light for more than 24 hours; however, these substrates are more expensive and require even more careful optimization than the luminol-based systems. AP-based hemiluminescent systems are also available. They are not also emit light for extended periods. Those systems produc- ing extended light output have the advantage that several ex posures can be taken from the same blot With the availability of fluorescence-scanning instruments, new methods for detection have come into use. It may seem at first glance that a secondary antibody could simply be coupled to a flu orescent molecule and the detection performed directly. Although this is possible, this method is not sufficiently sensitive for most purposes. The approach usually taken uses an enzyme-coupled 376 Riis

washed and exposed to film for hours or days. Radioactive blots can more quickly be detected using storage phosphor plates instead of film; the plates are read on a specialized scanning instru￾ment. Detailed discussions about the features and benefits of detection by film and scanners are included in Chapter 14, Nucleic Acid Hybridization. Enzymatic reactions are used in a number of different systems to indicate the presence of bound antibody. The simplest type of enzymatic detection is chromogenic. Here the secondary reagent is conjugated to an enzyme, either horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or alkaline phosphatase (AP). After incubation with the sec￾ondary reagent and washing, the blot is incubated with a substrate. The enzyme catalyzes a reaction in which the substrate is con￾verted to a colored precipitate directly on the membrane, essen￾tially coloring the band on which the primary antibody has bound. While not as sensitive as other methods, colorimetric detection is fast and simple, and requires no special facilities. Chemiluminescent detection combines characteristics of both radioactive and chromogenic detection. Again, an enzyme label is used (commonly HRP, but there are systems for use with AP as well), but in this case the reaction produces light rather than a colored product as a result of reaction. The light is usually cap￾tured on X-ray film, just like a radioactive blot. Specialized imaging equipment for chemiluminescent blots is also available. Chemiluminescent detection is very sensitive, and the blots are easily stripped for subsequent reprobing. There are significant differences in the various available chemi￾luminescent detection systems. The most widely used are the luminol-based HRP systems. These typically emit usable signals for an hour or two. There are also newer, higher-sensitivity HRP￾based systems that emit light for more than 24 hours; however, these substrates are more expensive and require even more careful optimization than the luminol-based systems. AP-based chemiluminescent systems are also available. They are not widely used in Western blotting, but they are highly sensitive and also emit light for extended periods. Those systems produc￾ing extended light output have the advantage that several ex￾posures can be taken from the same blot. With the availability of fluorescence-scanning instruments, new methods for detection have come into use. It may seem at first glance that a secondary antibody could simply be coupled to a flu￾orescent molecule and the detection performed directly.Although this is possible, this method is not sufficiently sensitive for most purposes. The approach usually taken uses an enzyme-coupled 376 Riis

secondary reagent(in this case usually AP) and a substrate that produces an insoluble, fluorescent product. The enzymatic reac tion results in amplification of the signal, giving much better sen sitivity than a fluorescently tagged secondary reagent. The blot is read on a fluorescent scanner and recorded as a digitized image What Are the Criteria for Selecting a Detection Method? There is a natural tendency to choose the most sensitive method available. High-sensitivity systems are desirable for detection of low-abundance proteins, but they are also desirable in cases where primary antibody is expensive or in limited supply, since these systems allow antibodies to be used at high dilutions. On the other hand, low-sensitivity systems, especially chromogenic systems, are easy to work with, require less exacting optimization, and tend to be less prone to background problems. Sensitivity overkill can be more trouble than it is worth What can you conclude from commercial sensitivity data? It can be difficult to compare the claims of sensitivity made by commercial suppliers. Although there is nothing wrong with the way these values are established, comparison between different systems can be difficult because the values depend on the exact conditions under which the determination was made. The primary antibody has a large effect on the overall sensitivity of any system, so comparisons between systems using different primary antibod ies are less meaningful than they may seem at first glance. In order to compare two different detection systems, the target protein, the primary antibody, and, where possible, the secondary reagent should be the same. Such direct comparisons are hard to come by Also sensitivity claims are usually made with purified protein rather than with crude lysate. For these reasons commercial sen sitivity claims should be considered approximate, and it may be unrealistic to expect to attain the same level of sensitivity in your own system as that quoted by the manufacturer. urat Will your research situation require extended signal output in order to prepare several exposures from the same blot? ability to quantitate Film-based systems(chemiluminescent and radioactive)as well as fluorescence-scanning methods, allow quantitation of target proteins. Results on film are quantified by densitometry, while the Western blotting 377

secondary reagent (in this case usually AP) and a substrate that produces an insoluble, fluorescent product. The enzymatic reac￾tion results in amplification of the signal, giving much better sen￾sitivity than a fluorescently tagged secondary reagent. The blot is read on a fluorescent scanner and recorded as a digitized image. What Are the Criteria for Selecting a Detection Method? Sensitivity There is a natural tendency to choose the most sensitive method available. High-sensitivity systems are desirable for detection of low-abundance proteins, but they are also desirable in cases where primary antibody is expensive or in limited supply, since these systems allow antibodies to be used at high dilutions. On the other hand, low-sensitivity systems, especially chromogenic systems, are easy to work with, require less exacting optimization, and tend to be less prone to background problems. Sensitivity overkill can be more trouble than it is worth. What can you conclude from commercial sensitivity data? It can be difficult to compare the claims of sensitivity made by commercial suppliers. Although there is nothing wrong with the way these values are established, comparison between different systems can be difficult because the values depend on the exact conditions under which the determination was made. The primary antibody has a large effect on the overall sensitivity of any system, so comparisons between systems using different primary antibod￾ies are less meaningful than they may seem at first glance. In order to compare two different detection systems, the target protein, the primary antibody, and, where possible, the secondary reagent should be the same. Such direct comparisons are hard to come by. Also sensitivity claims are usually made with purified protein rather than with crude lysate. For these reasons commercial sen￾sitivity claims should be considered approximate, and it may be unrealistic to expect to attain the same level of sensitivity in your own system as that quoted by the manufacturer. Signal Duration Will your research situation require extended signal output in order to prepare several exposures from the same blot? Ability to Quantitate Film-based systems (chemiluminescent and radioactive) as well as fluorescence-scanning methods, allow quantitation of target proteins. Results on film are quantified by densitometry, while the Western Blotting 377

digital raw data from fluorescence scanners (and storag phosphor scanners for radioactive detection) is inherently quan titative. The linear range of film-based systems (limited by the response of the film)is a little better than one order of magnitude hile the manufacturers of fluorescent scanners claim something closer to two orders of magnitude There are several cautions to bear in mind when considering protein blot quantitation Standards(known amounts of purified target protein-not to be confused with molecular weight stan dards)must be run on every blot, since even with the most con- stent technique there can be blot-to-blot variation. The standard should be loaded on the gel, electrophoresed, and transferred in exactly the same way your samples are The determination of quantity can only be made within the ange of standards on the blot: extrapolation beyond the actual standard values is not valid. This together with the limited linear range means that several dilutions of the unknown sample usually must be run on the same blot given all the lanes of standards and sample dilutions, the amount of quantitative data that can be extracted from a single blot is somewhat limited. Protein blot uantitation can be useful, but it is not a substitute for techniques such as elisa or ria Antibody requirements Typically the choice of available primary antibodies is not as vide as that of the other elements of the detection system. Primary antibodies can be obtained from commercial suppliers, non-profit repositories, and even other researchers. Tracking down a primary antibody can be time-consuming, but publications such as Lin- scottsDirectory(linscott,1999,andhttp://www.linscottsdirec tory. com/index2hmD,the“ Antibody Resource Page”(htp∥ www.antibodyresource.com),theUsenetnewsgroup"methods and Reagents"(bionet. molbio. methds-reagnts ), and Stefan Dubel's recombinantantibodypage(www.mgen.uni-heidelberg.de/sd/ SdscFvsite.htmlandwww.antibody.comcanhelp If no antibodies against your target protein exist, your only options are to raise the antibody yourself or to have someone do it. Companies such as Berkeley Antibody Company, Genosys, Rockland, and Zymed(among many others) can do his kind of work on a contract basis. Whichever route you choose, this is a time-consuming and potentially expensive undertaking 378 Riis

digital raw data from fluorescence scanners (and storage￾phosphor scanners for radioactive detection) is inherently quan￾titative. The linear range of film-based systems (limited by the response of the film) is a little better than one order of magnitude, while the manufacturers of fluorescent scanners claim something closer to two orders of magnitude. There are several cautions to bear in mind when considering protein blot quantitation. Standards (known amounts of purified target protein—not to be confused with molecular weight stan￾dards) must be run on every blot, since even with the most con￾sistent technique there can be blot-to-blot variation. The standard should be loaded on the gel, electrophoresed, and transferred in exactly the same way your samples are. The determination of quantity can only be made within the range of standards on the blot: extrapolation beyond the actual standard values is not valid. This together with the limited linear range means that several dilutions of the unknown sample usually must be run on the same blot. Given all the lanes of standards and sample dilutions, the amount of quantitative data that can be extracted from a single blot is somewhat limited. Protein blot quantitation can be useful, but it is not a substitute for techniques such as ELISA or RIA. Antibody Requirements Typically the choice of available primary antibodies is not as wide as that of the other elements of the detection system. Primary antibodies can be obtained from commercial suppliers, non-profit repositories, and even other researchers. Tracking down a primary antibody can be time-consuming, but publications such as Lin￾scott’s Directory (Linscott, 1999, and http://www.linscottsdirec￾tory.com/index2.html), the “Antibody Resource Page” (http:// www.antibodyresource.com), the Usenet newsgroup “Methods and Reagents” (bionet.molbio.methds-reagnts), and Stefan Dubel’s recombinant antibody page (www.mgen.uni-heidelberg.de/SD/ SDscFvSite.html) and www.antibody.com can help. If no antibodies against your target protein exist, your only options are to raise the antibody yourself or to have someone else do it. Companies such as Berkeley Antibody Company, Genosys, Rockland, and Zymed (among many others) can do this kind of work on a contract basis. Whichever route you choose, this is a time-consuming and potentially expensive undertaking. 378 Riis

Ability to Strip and Reprobe Radioactive and chemiluminescent systems are ideally suited to stripping and reprobing. Other systems(chemifluorescent and chromogenic) leave insoluble precipitates over the bands of inter- est; these precipitates can be removed only with the use of sol vents, which is an unpleasant extra step and can be hard on blots Not all targets survive this treatment. (See below for important cautions regarding stripping.) Equipment and Facility requirements Radioactivity can be used only after fulfilling stringent training nd licensing requirements. Radioactive methods, like chemilumi nescent methods, also require darkroom facilities(unless storage phosphor equipment is available). Fluorescent methods require specialized scanning equipment. Chromogenic methods do not require any specialized facilities or equipment. What Are the Keys to obtaining High-Quality Results? Careful choice of materials, an understanding of the questio your experiments are intended to answer, and an appreciation of the fact that every new system requires optimization are all neces- sary for obtaining good results. Optimization takes time, but it will pay off in the final result. It is also important to develop consistency in technique from day to day, and to keep detailed and accurate records. Consistency and good record-keeping will make it much asier to isolate the source of any problem that may come up later Which Transfer Membrane Is Most Appropriate to Your needs? The same considerations go into the choice of membrane that go into the choice of any other component of your detection strat egy. What is the molecular weight of your protein? What detec tion method will you use, and does this method have special membrane requirements? Do you intend to strip and reprobo your blots? (See Table 13.2.) itrocellulose wets easily and gives clean backgrounds. Unfo tunately, it is physically fragile(liable to tear and crack), especially when dry. This fragility makes nitrocellulose undesirable for use in stripping and reprobing The problem of physical fragility has been overcome with the introduction of supported nitrocellulose, which has surfaces of nitrocellulose over a core or"web"of phys- ically stronger material. The added physical strength comes at the cost of slightly higher background Western blotting 379

Ability to Strip and Reprobe Radioactive and chemiluminescent systems are ideally suited to stripping and reprobing. Other systems (chemifluorescent and chromogenic) leave insoluble precipitates over the bands of inter￾est; these precipitates can be removed only with the use of sol￾vents, which is an unpleasant extra step and can be hard on blots. Not all targets survive this treatment. (See below for important cautions regarding stripping.) Equipment and Facility Requirements Radioactivity can be used only after fulfilling stringent training and licensing requirements. Radioactive methods, like chemilumi￾nescent methods, also require darkroom facilities (unless storage phosphor equipment is available). Fluorescent methods require specialized scanning equipment. Chromogenic methods do not require any specialized facilities or equipment. What Are the Keys to Obtaining High-Quality Results? Careful choice of materials, an understanding of the questions your experiments are intended to answer, and an appreciation of the fact that every new system requires optimization are all neces￾sary for obtaining good results. Optimization takes time, but it will pay off in the final result.It is also important to develop consistency in technique from day to day, and to keep detailed and accurate records. Consistency and good record-keeping will make it much easier to isolate the source of any problem that may come up later. Which Transfer Membrane Is Most Appropriate to Your Needs? The same considerations go into the choice of membrane that go into the choice of any other component of your detection strat￾egy. What is the molecular weight of your protein? What detec￾tion method will you use, and does this method have special membrane requirements? Do you intend to strip and reprobe your blots? (See Table 13.2.) Nitrocellulose wets easily and gives clean backgrounds. Unfor￾tunately, it is physically fragile (liable to tear and crack), especially when dry. This fragility makes nitrocellulose undesirable for use in stripping and reprobing. The problem of physical fragility has been overcome with the introduction of supported nitrocellulose, which has surfaces of nitrocellulose over a core or “web” of phys￾ically stronger material. The added physical strength comes at the cost of slightly higher background. Western Blotting 379

Table 3.2 Characteristics of transfer membranes Characteristics Nitrocellulose Low background. Easy to block Supported Binding properties similar to nitrocellulose. Higher background than pure nitrocellulose Physically strong Physically strong Highly hydrophobic: requires methanol pre-wetting and dries easily. Good for stripping and reprobir PVDF (polyvinylidene difluoride) membranes are physically ger and have higher protein-binding capacity than lulose. However, they are highly hydrophobic: so much so that hey need to be pre-wetted with methanol before they can be equilibrated with aqueous buffer. When handling PVDF, you should take special care to ensure the membrane does not dry out, since uneven blocking, antibody incubation, washing, or detection can result. If the membrane does dry out, it should be re-equilibrated in methanol and then in aqueous buffer. The high affinity of PVDF for protein gives efficient transfer and high detection efficiency, but it can make background control more difficult. PVDF is the membrane of choice for stripping and reprobing Transfer membranes are available in several pore sizes. The standard pore size, suitable for most applications, is 0. 45 micron Membranes are also commonly available in 0.2 and even 0.1 micron pore size: these smaller pore sizes are suitable for transfer of lower molecular weight proteins, below about 12kDa Transfer efficiency is not good with membranes with a pore size of less than 0.1 micron BLOCKING All transfer membranes have a high affinity for protein. The purpose of blocking is simply to prevent indiscriminate binding of ne detection antibodies by saturating all the remaining binding capacity of the membrane with some irrelevant protein (For a detailed discussion see amersham, n.d. from which much of the following is drawn.) Riis

PVDF (polyvinylidene difluoride) membranes are physically stronger and have higher protein-binding capacity than nitrocel￾lulose. However, they are highly hydrophobic: so much so that they need to be pre-wetted with methanol before they can be equilibrated with aqueous buffer. When handling PVDF, you should take special care to ensure the membrane does not dry out, since uneven blocking, antibody incubation, washing, or detection can result. If the membrane does dry out, it should be re-equilibrated in methanol and then in aqueous buffer. The high affinity of PVDF for protein gives efficient transfer and high detection efficiency, but it can make background control more difficult. PVDF is the membrane of choice for stripping and reprobing. Transfer membranes are available in several pore sizes. The standard pore size, suitable for most applications, is 0.45 micron. Membranes are also commonly available in 0.2 and even 0.1 micron pore size: these smaller pore sizes are suitable for transfer of lower molecular weight proteins, below about 12 kDa. Transfer efficiency is not good with membranes with a pore size of less than 0.1 micron. BLOCKING All transfer membranes have a high affinity for protein. The purpose of blocking is simply to prevent indiscriminate binding of the detection antibodies by saturating all the remaining binding capacity of the membrane with some irrelevant protein. (For a detailed discussion, see Amersham, n.d., from which much of the following is drawn.) 380 Riis Table 13.2 Characteristics of Transfer Membranes Membrane Characteristics Nitrocellulose Low background. Easy to block. Physically fragile. Supported Binding properties similar to nitrocellulose. nitrocellulose Higher background than pure nitrocellulose. Physically strong. PVDF High protein binding capacity. Physically strong. Highly hydrophobic: requires methanol pre-wetting and dries easily. Good for stripping and reprobing

Which Blocking Agent Best Meets Your Needs? The protein most commonly used for the purpose is nonfat dry milk. often referred to as "blotto. used at 0.5% in Pbs contain ing 0.1%Tween-20. Any grocery-store brand of nonfat dry milk can be used Gelatin is isolated from a number of species, but fish skin gelatin is usually considered the best for Western blotting. Fish gelatin is usually used at a concentration of 2%. It is an effective blocker ll not gel at this concentration at 4oC. Bovine serum albumin(BSa)is available in a wide range of grades. Usually a blotting or immunological grade of BsA is appropriate. It is less expensive than fish skin gelatin, and can be used at 2% Normal serum(fetal calf or horse) is used sometimes, at a con- centration of 10%. It can be an effective blocking agent, but is quite expensive. Since serum contains immunoglobulins, it is not compatible with Protein A and some secondary antibodies. Casein can be used at 1%, but it is very difficult to get dry casein into solution. Casein and casein hydrolysate are the basis of some commercial blocking agents Different primary antibodies work better with different block ing agents: nonfat dry milk is usually a good first choice, but when setting up a new method, it is a good idea to evaluate different blockers It has been claimed that some blocking agents, nonfat dry milk particular, can hide or"mask"certain antigens Of course, there must be no component of the blocking agent that the primary or secondary antibodies can specifically react with Some researchers include a second blocking step prior to sec- ondary antibody incubation. However, if the initial blocking is suf ficient and reagent dilutions are optimal, this should not be A more specific kind of blocking may be needed when avidin or streptavidin is used as a detection reagent and the sample con tains biotin-bearing proteins Because of this"endogenous biotin the avidin or streptavidin will pick up these undesired proteins directly. If you suspect this may be a problem, a control reaction can be run with no primary antibody but with the avidin or strep- tavidin detection. The presence of bands in this control reaction will indicate that the avidin or streptavidin is binding to the endogenous biotin The remedy for such a situation is to treat the blot prior to anti- dy incubation first with avidin (to bind all the endogenous Western blotting 38

Which Blocking Agent Best Meets Your Needs? The protein most commonly used for the purpose is nonfat dry milk, often referred to as “blotto,” used at 0.5% in PBS contain￾ing 0.1% Tween-20. Any grocery-store brand of nonfat dry milk can be used. Gelatin is isolated from a number of species, but fish skin gelatin is usually considered the best for Western blotting. Fish gelatin is usually used at a concentration of 2%. It is an effective blocker, and will not gel at this concentration at 4°C. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) is available in a wide range of grades. Usually a blotting or immunological grade of BSA is appropriate. It is less expensive than fish skin gelatin, and can be used at 2%. Normal serum (fetal calf or horse) is used sometimes, at a con￾centration of 10%. It can be an effective blocking agent, but is quite expensive. Since serum contains immunoglobulins, it is not compatible with Protein A and some secondary antibodies. Casein can be used at 1%, but it is very difficult to get dry casein into solution. Casein and casein hydrolysate are the basis of some commercial blocking agents. Different primary antibodies work better with different block￾ing agents: nonfat dry milk is usually a good first choice, but when setting up a new method, it is a good idea to evaluate different blockers. It has been claimed that some blocking agents, nonfat dry milk in particular, can hide or “mask” certain antigens. Of course, there must be no component of the blocking agent that the primary or secondary antibodies can specifically react with. Some researchers include a second blocking step prior to sec￾ondary antibody incubation. However, if the initial blocking is suf- ficient and reagent dilutions are optimal, this should not be necessary. A more specific kind of blocking may be needed when avidin or streptavidin is used as a detection reagent and the sample con￾tains biotin-bearing proteins. Because of this “endogenous biotin” the avidin or streptavidin will pick up these undesired proteins directly. If you suspect this may be a problem, a control reaction can be run with no primary antibody but with the avidin or strep￾tavidin detection. The presence of bands in this control reaction will indicate that the avidin or streptavidin is binding to the endogenous biotin. The remedy for such a situation is to treat the blot prior to anti￾body incubation first with avidin (to bind all the endogenous Western Blotting 381

biotin) and then with free biotin(to block all remaining free binding sites on the added avidin). The free biotin is washed away and antibody detection can proceed(Lydan and O'Day, 1991) WASHING Thorough washing is critical to obtaining clean blots, so washing imes and solution volumes should always be generous. It is impor- tant to realize that protein binding and antibody interactions do not all occur at the surface but rather throughout the entire hickness of the membrane. For this reason, thorough soaking and luilibration of the membrane is critical at every step Washing should always be performed at room temperature and with thorough agitation. The exact volume of wash buffer will depend on the container used for washing, but the depth of the solution should be about 1 cm. When protocols call for changing wash solution, this should not be ignored. The higher the sensitiv ity of the detection method, the more important is scrupulous washing technique What Composition of wash Buffer Should You Use Standard wash buffer simply consists of PBs or TBs with added detergent: Tween-20 is routinely used at 0. 1%, although Tween concentrations can be raised to as high as 0.3% to help reduce background. Concentrations higher than this tend to disrupt anti body binding. Triton, NP-40 and SDs should not be used, as they may strip off bound antibodies or target proteins Another method sometimes used to increase the effectiveness of washing is increasing the concentration of salt in the wash solu- tion. High salt reduces charge-mediated effects, which tend to be less specific, and favors hydrophobic interactions, which are more specific. The usual upper limit for NaCl concentration in wash buffers is 500mM. (Standard PBS and TBS contain 130mM NaCl) What Are Common blot size Format. and Handling Techniques? Small blots, or larger blots cut into strips for analysis with several different antibodies, can be incubated in large centrifuge tubes or specialized strip-incubation trays. Larger blots should be incubated in trays. Centrifuge tubes are convenient and allow small reagent volumes to be used. Even with trays, there only needs to be sufficient blocking or antibody solution to submerge Riis

biotin) and then with free biotin (to block all remaining free binding sites on the added avidin). The free biotin is washed away, and antibody detection can proceed (Lydan and O’Day, 1991). WASHING Thorough washing is critical to obtaining clean blots, so washing times and solution volumes should always be generous. It is impor￾tant to realize that protein binding and antibody interactions do not all occur at the surface but rather throughout the entire thickness of the membrane. For this reason, thorough soaking and equilibration of the membrane is critical at every step. Washing should always be performed at room temperature and with thorough agitation. The exact volume of wash buffer will depend on the container used for washing, but the depth of the solution should be about 1cm. When protocols call for changing wash solution, this should not be ignored. The higher the sensitiv￾ity of the detection method, the more important is scrupulous washing technique. What Composition of Wash Buffer Should You Use? Standard wash buffer simply consists of PBS or TBS with added detergent: Tween-20 is routinely used at 0.1%, although Tween concentrations can be raised to as high as 0.3% to help reduce background. Concentrations higher than this tend to disrupt anti￾body binding. Triton, NP-40 and SDS should not be used, as they may strip off bound antibodies or target proteins. Another method sometimes used to increase the effectiveness of washing is increasing the concentration of salt in the wash solu￾tion. High salt reduces charge-mediated effects, which tend to be less specific, and favors hydrophobic interactions, which are more specific. The usual upper limit for NaCl concentration in wash buffers is 500 mM. (Standard PBS and TBS contain 130 mM NaCl.) What Are Common Blot Size, Format, and Handling Techniques? Small blots, or larger blots cut into strips for analysis with several different antibodies, can be incubated in large centrifuge tubes or specialized strip-incubation trays. Larger blots should be incubated in trays. Centrifuge tubes are convenient and allow small reagent volumes to be used. Even with trays, there only needs to be sufficient blocking or antibody solution to submerge 382 Riis