Contents 1 Definition 2 The principle of Deviation 3 Deviation Rhetorical Effects 4 Context-independence 5 Summary Assignments
The principle of Deviation Contents 2 3 Deviation & Rhetorical Effects 4 Context-independence Summary & Assignments 5 1 Definition
1 Definition Deviation is a linguistic phenomenon whereby writers eschew norm for new or unusual ones
1 Definition Deviation is a linguistic phenomenon whereby writers eschew norm for new or unusual ones
1.Definition:Deviation ￥10000>￥230,000 This strange formula passing on strange information caught my attention and in-depth thoughts:deviation produces prominent effects
1. Definition: Deviation ￥10000 > ￥230,000 This strange formula passing on strange information caught my attention and in-depth thoughts: deviation produces prominent effects
2.The principle of Deviation 1)Ineffableness:The quality of signers that fail to convey the meaning.It's said that the best things can't be talked about because no tongue can describe it 2)Paradox Similar to circular reasoning,a paradox is a logical statement or group of statements that lead to a contradiction or a situation which (if true)defies logic or reason
2. The principle of Deviation 1)Ineffableness: The quality of signers that fail to convey the meaning. It's said that the best things can't be talked about because no tongue can describe it 2)Paradox :Similar to circular reasoning, a paradox is a logical statement or group of statements that lead to a contradiction or a situation which (if true) defies logic or reason
Ineffableness A to B:I wouldn't say it for the life of me. C to B:What did A say? B to C:I wouldn't say it for the life of me
Ineffableness A to B: I wouldn’t say it for the life of me. C to B: What did A say? B to C: I wouldn’t say it for the life of me
Paradox Corax and Tissias
Paradox Corax and Tissias
Is Orr crazy?" "He sure is,"Doc Daneeka said. "Can you ground him?" "I sure can.But first he has to ask me to.That's part of the rule." "Then why doesn't he ask you to?" "Because he's crazy,"Doc Daneeka said."He has to be crazy to keep flying combat missions after all the close calls he's had.Sure,I can ground Orr. But first he has to ask me to." "That's all he has to do to be grounded?" "That's all.Let him ask me." "And then you can ground him?"Yossarian asked. "No.Then I can't ground him." "You mean there's a catch?" "Sure there's a catch,"Doc Daneeka replied."Catch-22.Anyone who wants to get out of combat duty isn't really crazy."(quoted from Joseph Heller, 1955,46)
Is Orr crazy?" "He sure is," Doc Daneeka said. "Can you ground him?" "I sure can. But first he has to ask me to. That's part of the rule." "Then why doesn't he ask you to?" "Because he's crazy," Doc Daneeka said. "He has to be crazy to keep flying combat missions after all the close calls he's had. Sure, I can ground Orr. But first he has to ask me to." "That's all he has to do to be grounded?" "That's all. Let him ask me." "And then you can ground him?" Yossarian asked. "No. Then I can't ground him." "You mean there's a catch?" "Sure there's a catch," Doc Daneeka replied. "Catch-22. Anyone who wants to get out of combat duty isn't really crazy." (quoted from Joseph Heller, 1955, 46)
This dialogue is full of oxymoron.If Orr is really crazy,he is not allowed to carry out the mission,but he needs to apply for it,and once he hands in the application,he will be proved not crazy,so he must carry out his mission.So if Orr is really crazy,he would carry out more missions;if he is sober,he will not do so,but he must finish the missions; if he will carry out the mission,it shows that he is crazy,so he doesn't want to finish the mission,if he will not carry out the mission,it shows that he is sober,then he must finish the mission.We see that the logic of the above dialogue is simple but absurd
❖ This dialogue is full of oxymoron. If Orr is really crazy, he is not allowed to carry out the mission, but he needs to apply for it, and once he hands in the application, he will be proved not crazy, so he must carry out his mission. So if Orr is really crazy, he would carry out more missions; if he is sober, he will not do so, but he must finish the missions; if he will carry out the mission, it shows that he is crazy, so he doesn’t want to finish the mission, if he will not carry out the mission, it shows that he is sober, then he must finish the mission. We see that the logic of the above dialogue is simple but absurd
Semantic Triangle The cause of paradox and ineffableness can be explained by Semantic Triangle by Ogden Richards Concept or 、thought a word symbolizes a concept a concept refers to a thing Referent symbol/ 01 word thing a word stands for a referent
Semantic Triangle a word symbolizes a concept a concept refers to a thing a word stands for a referent The cause of paradox and ineffableness can be explained by Semantic Triangle by Ogden & Richards
Interpretation of Triangle Theory 1 2 3 Deviation as a limitedness effective method A dotted linear alignment for limitedless line between V.S.pluralism linear alignment symbol and V.S.pluralism and complexity thing and complexity of the meaning of the meaning
Interpretation of Triangle Theory 1 limitedness linear alignment V.S. pluralism and complexity of the meaning 2 3 A dotted line between symbol and thing Deviation as a effective method for limitedless linear alignment V.S. pluralism and complexity of the meaning