Synthia, the first man-made creature Scientist accused of playing God after creating artificial life by making designer microbe from scratch -but could it wipe out humanity Scientists today lined up to air their fears over a genome pioneer's claims that he has created artificial life in the laboratory. In a world first, which has alarmed many, maverick biologist and billionaire entrepreneur Crai Venter, built a synthetic cell from scratch The creation of the new life form, which has been nicknamed "Synthia, paves the way for customised bugs that could revolutionise healthcare and fuel production, according to its maker But there are fears that the research, detailed in the journal Science, could be abused to create the ultimate biological weapon, or that one mistake in a lab could lead to millions being wiped out by a plague, in scenes reminiscent of the Will Smith film I Am Legend
1 Synthia, the first man-made creature Scientist accused of playing God after creating artificial life by making designer microbe from scratch - but could it wipe out humanity? Scientists today lined up to air their fears over a genome pioneer's claims that he has created artificial life in the laboratory. In a world first, which has alarmed many, maverick biologist and billionaire entrepreneur Craig Venter, built a synthetic cell from scratch. The creation of the new life form, which has been nicknamed 'Synthia', paves the way for customised bugs that could revolutionise healthcare and fuel production, according to its maker. But there are fears that the research, detailed in the journal Science, could be abused to create the ultimate biological weapon, or that one mistake in a lab could lead to millions being wiped out by a plague, in scenes reminiscent of the Will Smith film I Am Legend
HOW TO MAKE ARTIFICIAL LIFE 1 Entire DNA of Mycoplasma mycoides, a bug that usually infects goats, is decoded Synthetic KA DNA code 2 Researchers buy fragments of DNA from a mail order catologue Each of the four bottles of chemicals contains a section of the code 3 The fragments are put into yeast, which stitches them together, gradually building a synthetic copy Maverick of the original DNA. Dr craig Venter Artificial DNA Natur 4 The artificial DNA is put into a recipient bacterium, which then grows and divides. creating two daughter cells. one with the artificial DNA and one with the natural dNA aNtibiotics in the petri dish kill the bacterium with the natural DNA, leaving the one with the synthetic DNA to multiply. 6 within Just a few hours, all traces of 7 Possible uses are bugs the recipient bug capable of producing cleal are wiped out and fuels and sucking carbon bugs with artificial dioxide out of the DNA thrive. New life atmosphere. Also microbe has been created capable of mopping up oil slicks(above)or generating drugs, induding the flu vaccine
2
While some hailed the research as 'a defining moment in the history of biology, others attacked it as 'a shot in the dark, with ' unparalleled risks. The team involved have been accused of playing God and tampering'with the essence of life Dr Venter created the lifeform by synthesising a DNa code and injecting it into a single bacteria cell. The cell containing the man-made dNa then grew and divided, creating a hitherto unseen lifeform Kenneth Oye, a social scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the U.S,said Right now, we are shooting in the dark as to what the long-term benefits and long-term risks will This picture shows the colonies of the artificial lifeform nicknamed'Synthia Pat Mooney, of the ETC group, a technology watchdog with a special interest in synthetic biology, said: This is a Pandora's box moment-like the splitting of the atom or the cloning of Dolly the sheep, we will all have to deal with the fall-out from this alarming experiment Dr David King, of the Human Genetics Alert watchdog, said: What is really dangerous is these scientists'ambitions for total and unrestrained control over nature, which many people describe as playing God Scientists understanding of biology falls far short of their technical capabilities. We have learned to our cost the risks that gap brings, for the environment, animal welfare and human health Professor Julian Savulescu, an Oxford University ethicist, said: ' Venter is creaking open the most profound door in humanity's history, potentially peeking into its destiny He is not merely copying life artificially or modifying it by genetic engineering. He is going towards the role of God creating artificial life that could never have existed He said the creation of the first designer bug was a step towards the creation of living beings with capacities and a nature that could never have naturally evolved. The risks were ' unparalleled, he dded And he warned: This could be used in the future to make the most powerful bioweapons imaginable. The challenge is to eat the fruit without the worm Dr Venter, who was instrumental in sequencing the human genome, had previously succeeded in transplanting one bugs genome- its entire cache of DNA- into another bacterium, effectively changing its species He has taken this one step further, transplanting not a natural genome but a man-made one. To do this, he read the DNA of Mycoplasma mycoides, a bug that infects goats, and recreated it piece by The fragments were then'stitched together and inserted into a bacterium from a different species There, it sprang to life, allowing the bug to grow and multiply, producing generations that were entirely artificial The transferred DNA contained around 850 genes -a fraction of the 20.000 or so contained in a human,s genetic blueprint In future, bacterial factories could be set up to manufacture artificial organisms designed for specific tasks such as medicines or producing clean biofuels The technology could also be harnessed to create environmentally friendly bugs capable of mopping up carbon dioxide or toxic waste
3 While some hailed the research as 'a defining moment in the history of biology', others attacked it as 'a shot in the dark', with 'unparalleled risks'. The team involved have been accused of 'playing God' and tampering 'with the essence of life'. Dr Venter created the lifeform by synthesising a DNA code and injecting it into a single bacteria cell. The cell containing the man-made DNA then grew and divided, creating a hitherto unseen lifeform. Kenneth Oye, a social scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the U.S., said: 'Right now, we are shooting in the dark as to what the long-term benefits and long-term risks will be.' This picture shows the colonies of the artificial lifeform nicknamed 'Synthia' Pat Mooney, of the ETC group, a technology watchdog with a special interest in synthetic biology, said: 'This is a Pandora's box moment - like the splitting of the atom or the cloning of Dolly the sheep, we will all have to deal with the fall-out from this alarming experiment.' Dr David King, of the Human Genetics Alert watchdog, said: 'What is really dangerous is these scientists' ambitions for total and unrestrained control over nature, which many people describe as 'playing God'. 'Scientists' understanding of biology falls far short of their technical capabilities. We have learned to our cost the risks that gap brings, for the environment, animal welfare and human health.' Professor Julian Savulescu, an Oxford University ethicist, said: 'Venter is creaking open the most profound door in humanity's history, potentially peeking into its destiny. 'He is not merely copying life artificially or modifying it by genetic engineering. He is going towards the role of God: Creating artificial life that could never have existed.' He said the creation of the first designer bug was a step towards 'the creation of living beings with capacities and a nature that could never have naturally evolved'. The risks were 'unparalleled',' he added. And he warned: 'This could be used in the future to make the most powerful bioweapons imaginable. The challenge is to eat the fruit without the worm.' Dr Venter, who was instrumental in sequencing the human genome, had previously succeeded in transplanting one bug's genome - its entire cache of DNA - into another bacterium, effectively changing its species. He has taken this one step further, transplanting not a natural genome but a man-made one. To do this, he read the DNA of Mycoplasma mycoides, a bug that infects goats, and recreated it piece by piece. The fragments were then 'stitched together' and inserted into a bacterium from a different species. There, it sprang to life, allowing the bug to grow and multiply, producing generations that were entirely artificial. The transferred DNA contained around 850 genes - a fraction of the 20,000 or so contained in a human's genetic blueprint. In future, bacterial 'factories' could be set up to manufacture artificial organisms designed for specific tasks such as medicines or producing clean biofuels. The technology could also be harnessed to create environmentally friendly bugs capable of mopping up carbon dioxide or toxic waste
Dr Venter, a 63-year-old Vietnam War veteran known for his showman tendencies, said last night We are entering a new era where were limited mostly by our imaginations But the breakthrough, which took 15 years and f277million to achieve, opens an ethical Pandora's box. Ethicists said he is 'creaking open the most profound door in humanity s history-with unparalleled risks Dr Venter, whose team of 20 scientists includes a Nobel laureate, likens the process to booting-up Like a program without a hard drive, the dNa doesn't do anything by itself. But, when the software is loaded into the computer- in this case the second bacterium- amazing things are possible, he said Now that the scientist, whose J Craig Venter Institute has labs in California and Maryland, has proved the concept, the path is open for him to alter the recipe to create any sort of organism he At the top of his wishlist are bugs capable of producing clean biofuels and of sucking carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. Other possibilities include designer microbes that can mop up oil slicks or generate huge quantities of drugs, including the flu vaccine Any such organisms would be deliberately 'crippled so that they cannot survive outside the lab, he Brushing aside the ethical concerns of his work, Dr Venter wrote in his autobiography that it would allow 'a new creature to enter the world We have often been asked if this will be a step too far,'he said. 'I always reply that-so far at least we are only reconstructing a diminished version of what is out there in nature. Last night he claimed the breakthrough had changed his views on the definition of life. ' We have ended up with the first synthetic cell powered and controlled by a synthetic chromosome and made from four bottles of chemicals. he said It is pretty stunning when you just replace the DNA software in a cell and the cell instantly starts reading that new software and starts making a whole new set of proteins, and within a short while all the characteristics of the first species disappear and a new species emerges That's a pretty important change in how we approach and think about life. The process was carried out on one of the simplest types of bacteria, under strict ethical guideline The research team insist that they cannot think of a day when the technology could be used to create animals or people from scratch
4 Dr Venter, a 63-year-old Vietnam War veteran known for his showman tendencies, said last night: 'We are entering a new era where we're limited mostly by our imaginations.' But the breakthrough, which took 15 years and £27.7million to achieve, opens an ethical Pandora's box. Ethicists said he is 'creaking open the most profound door in humanity's history' - with unparalleled risks. Dr Venter, whose team of 20 scientists includes a Nobel laureate, likens the process to booting-up a computer. Like a program without a hard drive, the DNA doesn't do anything by itself. But, when the software is loaded into the computer - in this case the second bacterium - amazing things are possible, he said. Now that the scientist, whose J Craig Venter Institute has labs in California and Maryland, has proved the concept, the path is open for him to alter the 'recipe' to create any sort of organism he chooses. At the top of his wishlist are bugs capable of producing clean biofuels and of sucking carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. Other possibilities include designer microbes that can mop up oil slicks or generate huge quantities of drugs, including the flu vaccine. Any such organisms would be deliberately 'crippled' so that they cannot survive outside the lab, he claimed. Brushing aside the ethical concerns of his work, Dr Venter wrote in his autobiography that it would allow 'a new creature to enter the world'. 'We have often been asked if this will be a step too far,' he said. 'I always reply that - so far at least - we are only reconstructing a diminished version of what is out there in nature.' Last night, he claimed the breakthrough had changed his views on the definition of life. 'We have ended up with the first synthetic cell powered and controlled by a synthetic chromosome and made from four bottles of chemicals,' he said. 'It is pretty stunning when you just replace the DNA software in a cell and the cell instantly starts reading that new software and starts making a whole new set of proteins, and within a short while all the characteristics of the first species disappear and a new species emerges. 'That's a pretty important change in how we approach and think about life.' The process was carried out on one of the simplest types of bacteria, under strict ethical guidelines. The research team insist that they cannot think of a day when the technology could be used to create animals or people from scratch
