乙乙HLdVHO HOVNONVI ANV NOILVOINNNNOO
ge Langua and tion Communica 22 Chapter 1 22 Chapter
石dey swajqo1d◇ sIsKjeue onequKs◇ ewwe◇ uoI1 eolunwwo)◇ ourinO
Outline Communication ♦ r Gramma ♦ analysis Syntactic ♦ Problems ♦ 2 22 Chapter
2KqM sov yoaads (696I)aHeas SP.IOM U3IM S3UIUL O03 MOH (796I)unsny suore3sOAuI Teorudosol!ud(ES6I)uI sua3!M uone jo wjoj e s!aBenguel :(EG6I-sod)MaInuapoW,, (1o)asjej/an aue neyl saouanuas jo sisisuoo aenguel :(EG6I-d)MOI esse
unication Comm re-1953): (p view “Classical” logic) (cf. true/false re a that sentences of consists language ost-1953): (p view dern” “Mo action of rm fo a is language estigations v In Philosophical (1953) Wittgenstein ords W with Things Do to w Ho (1962) Austin Acts h eec Sp (1969) rle Sea Why? 3 22 Chapter
p乙z1deuD 2KqM syoy yaads(696I)μeaS SP.IOM U3!M SSUIUL O03 MOH (796I)unsny suore3sOAuI leorydosol!ud(EG6I)uasua3!M uonoe jo wjoy e s!agenguel :(Eg6T-sod)MaI uapoW.. (13o )asjej/an ae ey saouaquas yo sas!suoo a3en3uel :(Eg6I-d)MaI sse, uorjeslunwwo
unication Comm re-1953): (p view “Classical” logic) (cf. true/false re a that sentences of consists language ost-1953): (p view dern” “Mo action of rm fo a is language estigations v In Philosophical (1953) Wittgenstein ords W with Things Do to w Ho (1962) Austin Acts h eec Sp (1969) rle Sea Why? 4 22 Chapter
9de 2KqM sov yoaads (696I)aHeas SP.IOM U3IM S3UIUL O03 MOH (796I)unsny suore3sOAuI Teorudosol!ud(ES6I)uI sua3!M uone jo wjoj e s!agenguel (EG6I-sod)MeInuapow,, (1o)asjej/an aue neyl saouanuas jo sisisuoo aenguel :(EG6I-d)MOI esse
unication Comm re-1953): (p view “Classical” logic) (cf. true/false re a that sentences of consists language ost-1953): (p view dern” “Mo action of rm fo a is language estigations v In Philosophical (1953) Wittgenstein ords W with Things Do to w Ho (1962) Austin Acts h eec Sp (1969) rle Sea Why? 5 22 Chapter
9 deyD squage oylo Jo suoraoe ay?e3uey oL 2KqM saoy ypaads(696T)μeaS SP.IOM U3!M SSUIUL O03 MOH (796I)unsny suore3sOAuI leorydosol!ud(EG6I)uasua3!M uonoe jo wjoy e s!agenguel (Eg6T-sod)MaInuapoW,. (13o)asjey/an ae eyl saouaquas jo sisisuo a3enguel :(Eg6I-d)MaI sse, uorjeslunwwo
unication Comm re-1953): (p view “Classical” logic) (cf. true/false re a that sentences of consists language ost-1953): (p view dern” “Mo action of rm fo a is language estigations v In Philosophical (1953) Wittgenstein ords W with Things Do to w Ho (1962) Austin Acts h eec Sp (1969) rle Sea Why? ts agen other of actions the hange c oT 6 22 Chapter
Keuone pue 'aseq apajMouy 's]eo s aeH- suonuanuoo oneuKs pue onueweS- uonenS go a3pajmouy sauinba Buluuejd ie ypaads MO..5pOIMouoV nok ym plo ay aeys ll.I. asiwoId dn d., puewwoo dPIo员ayHa∂s nok ue), KIan ,nok jo quoyy u!des∂ayLn wiojuI :sjeo8 s ayeads ayn analype sioe ypaads BeaH-ueen、-eyeads NOILVNLIS syoe yooadS
acts h eec Sp SITUATION Hearer Utterance Speaker goals: er’s eak sp the achieve acts eech Sp ou” y of front in pit a “There’s Inform gold?” the see ou y “Can Query up” it “Pick Command ou” y with gold the re sha “I’ll Promise “OK” wledge kno Ac of wledge kno requires planning act eech Sp Situation – conventions syntactic and Semantic – y rationalit and base, wledge kno goals, rer’s Hea – 7 22 Chapter
8 deyD iuom o8 siyn pino MOH gy onu!sanejodjoou!H uorelodIoou Bulueaw papualu!sleju!H uorqensIqwes!I s3ulueaw aq!ssod sju!H sIsAleuy 1xoquo u!M Sanlaad H uondaoIed M spoM sialin S SISayquS nxequoo u!d sseudxe o1 M1 spiom siajas S u04 eloua月 dey H wjoju!o1 squem S uorquoqul (Sulwlojul)uolqeorunwwoo UI sode4S
(informing) unication comm in Stages P that H rm info to ants w S tion ten In C context in P ress exp to W rds ow selects S Generation W rds ow utters S thesis Syn 0 C context in 0 W erceives p H erception P n P. . . , 1 P meanings ossible p infers H Analysis i P meaning intended infers H biguation Disam KB into i P rates o rp inco H oration Incorp wrong? go this could w Ho 8 22 Chapter
(O卡O）X34uo)1u3 un jo 3upue suapun 3uμaq- aouejann snongiquy- aunjlej uonlu8I yoaum yoaads- (d ana!leq 1,usaop S)Kauisul- iuoM o3 slya pino MOH gy ou!sanejodoou!H uorqelod.IoouI Bulueaw papuaqu!saju!H uorgen3qwres!I s3ujueaw alqissod suaju!H sIsKleuy 1xequo u!M Sanlaoued H uorqdaoIod M spIoM sianin S sIsayquS ixequo u!d ssaudxe 01 M spIoM sajes S u04 eloua月 d ley H wjoju!on squem S uorquoqul Sulwojul)uolleslunwwo soBelS
(informing) unication comm in Stages P that H rm info to ants w S tion ten In C context in P ress exp to W rds ow selects S Generation W rds ow utters S thesis Syn 0 C context in 0 W erceives p H erception P n P. . . , 1 P meanings ossible p infers H Analysis i P meaning intended infers H biguation Disam KB into i P rates o rp inco H oration Incorp wrong? go this could w Ho ) P elieve b esn’t do (S y Insincerit – failure ignition wreck eech Sp – utterance Ambiguous – C 6= C( context current of understanding Differing – 0) 9 22 Chapter
012Zdw见D sjeulwanuou ae pue dN 'oqufs auaquas ay1 s!S 3H ·|uD|D|344←-31p4lW dAdN←-S 'sajn aMal jo as e s!Jewweg ay uewwe8 ay Kq panejaua8/pazKjeue aq ueo aengue]ayl u!Buins ype sjoquks jeulwjan yo sBuuns o ias e s!aBenguel jewjol y (euosuaw!p-oM4)Isnu‘(eau）1X31‘(e3u)4p33ds:83 saBessaw xajdwo jo aunonus jeuonisodwo ay sallpads jewwe (saInaonIs o1equS (LG6I)Kyswoy)) Kipedeo anneJaua3 ou 'suonlsodod ajqeolunwwo o 1as paousa saouaquas Joy sjoquks panejos!asn a sadojaque 'sKayuow ae Iewwe
Grammar sentences r fo ols symb isolated use etc. es antelop eys, monk ervet V y capacit generative no ositions, rop p communicable of set restricted ⇒ ) Structures tactic Syn (1957): (Chomsky messages complex of structure ositional comp the ecifies sp r Gramma o-dimensional) w(t music r), (linea text r), (linea eech sp e.g., ols symb terminal of strings of set a is language rmal fo A r gramma the yb analyzed/generated eb can language the in string Each e.g., , rules rewrite of set a is r gramma The VP NP →S . . . | an | a | the → rticle A nonterminals re a VP and NP ol, symb sentence the is S Here 10 22 Chapter