675 Transforming Family Law in Post-Deng China:Marriage,Divorce and Reproduction* Michael Palmer ABSTRACT This article considers the principal changes in family law in the People's Republic of China during the post-Deng period.The developments that have occurred during the period of review have been notable for their pace and their contribution to a growing legal sophistication in China's corpus of family law.They expand on a series of major reforms in family law documented in my earlier China Quarterly article.Overall,it is in the area of divorce that the most dramatic changes have taken place in family law over the past decade. This article examines the continuing evolution of family law in the People's Republic of China (PRC).Since the publication in 1995 of an earlier China Quarterly article on post-Mao Chinese family law,the legal framework for family life has been reformed in order,inter alia,to deal with problems encountered with the regulatory system built up in the 1980s and early 1990s, and to respond to changes taking place in Chinese society.Two legislative developments are highly significant.First,the Marriage Law was revised in 2001,2 and greater judicial attention then given to its implementation,especially I thank participants in the conference on“Developments in Chinese Law:the Past Ten Years'"for their helpful comments on the draft version of this article.Responsibility for any remaining errors is mine alone. 1 Michael Palmer,"The re-emergence of family law in post-Mao China:marriage,divorce and reproduction,"in Stanley Lubman(guest ed.),“Law in China Under Reform,"The China Quarterly. No.141(1995),pp.110-34:republished in Stanley B.Lubman (ed.)China's Legal Reforms (Oxford: Oxford University Press,1996),pp.110-34. 2 For details see,for example,Ma Yinan,Hunyin jiating fa xinlun (New Discussions on Marriage and Family Law )(Beijing:Beijing daxue chubanshe,2002);Liu Shuqiang (ed.),Zhonghua renmin gongheguo hunyin fa tiaowen jieshi (Explanation of the Articles in the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China)(Chengdu:Sichuan renmin chubanshe,2001);Yang Xueming and Qu Zhi,Xin "hunyin fa"redian jujiao (Focus on Controversial Issues in the new Marriage Law)(Shenyang:Liaoning huabao chubanshe,2001);Ma Yuan (ed.),Xin hunyin fa ji sifa jishi shiyong zhinan (Practical Guidance on the New Marriage Law and Judicial Interpretations [on Marriage Law])(Beijing:Renmin fayuan chubanshe,2002);Ma Yuan (ed.),Xin hunyin fa:anli pingxi (The New Marriage Law:Case Analysis) (Beijing:Renmin fayuan chubanshe,2002).Within family law circles in China,the debate on the reform of the Marriage Law amendments is regarded as a significant step forward in public participation in the process of law reform.Nevertheless,a number of the more radical suggestions made were rejected and the extent to which the debate was truly free and open must be doubted,given party-state control of the media. CThe China Quarterly,2007 doi:10.1017/50305741007001658
! " # $ % ! &' ())* + $( % $ $ (),- ())- $ % . $ + / 0--($0 " $ 1 2 % 33 / 4 5 ( + $ 33 + 4 $ $ / & '$ 33/ 6 $ $ 7 (8( &())*'$ ((-9:8; / &' &#!4 #! 6 $ ()) ? @$ & '' & ( ) ' & 4 / $ 0--('; + 5 &'$ & * &$ + , ) " - .' &"4 $ 0--0'; + 5 &'$ & / " & / #' &"4 $ 0--0' A $ + / 7 $ " ! $ !"# !
676 The China Quarterly,191,September 2007,pp.675-695 in relation to divorce.'These changes were followed in 2003 by a further revision of the rules governing marriage (and divorce)registration.Secondly,a synthesizing,national code of family planning was finally introduced,also in 2001,and then extended in 2002 by State Council Measures on the Administration of Social Upbringing Charges.Other notable developments include the 1998 revision of the Adoption Law'and the continuing evolution of a corpus of social protection law(shehui baozhang fa社会保障法)including in particular the introduction of a law protecting the rights and interests of the elderly in 1996 and a revision of the 1992 Women's Protection Law in 2005.8 A number of the changes mentioned above and considered in greater detail below are also related to shifting policies and practices regarding the role of various forms of dispute process-especially“mediation”(tiaojie调节)-in Chinese social life in general and intra-familial disputes in particular. Three specific aspects of family law are focused on:marriage,divorce and reproduction.These are the core of PRC "family law."This focus does not accord exactly,however,with the "official"view in China,which regards rules and issues of family planning as largely falling outside family law,so that,for example,even compendia of rules on family law matters intended for judicial practice omit direct reference to legislation relating to reproduction and associated issues.The present article and its predecessor,however,both assume that planned births and population policies and rules are so critical for 3 That is,the 2001 "Zuigao renmin fayuan guanyu shiyong 'Zonghua renmin gongheguo hunyin fa' ruogan wenti de jieshi [1]"("Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on several problems concerning the application of the Marriage Law of the PRC [1]"),promulgated and in force 24 December 2001,and the 2003"Zuigao renmin fayuan guanyu shiyong 'Zonghua renmin gongheguo hunyin fa'ruogan wenti de jieshi (2)"("Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on several problems concerning the application of the Marriage Law of the PRC [2]")promulgated 25 December 2003 and in force 1 April 2004 in Hunyin fa peitao guiding(A Complete Set of Rules on the Marriage Low)(Beijing:Zhongguo fazhi chubanshe,2006)at pp.14-18 and pp.18-22 respectively.See also Zuigao renmin fayuan minshi shenpan diyi ting(First Civil Trial Chamber of the Supreme People's Court)(ed.).Hunyin fa sifa jieshi ji xiangguan fali guifan (Judicial Interpretations of the Marriage Law and Relevant Legal Provisions)(Beijing:Renmin fayuan chubanshe,2001);Huang Songyou (ed.), Hunyin fa sifa jieshi (2)de lijie yu shiyong (Understanding and Applying The Second Judicial Interpretation of the Marriage Law)(Beijing:Renmin fayuan chubanshe). Marriage Registration Regulations(Hunyin dengji tiaoli),promulgated by the State Council,8 August 2003 and in force 1 October 2003,in A Complete Set of Rules on the Marriage Law.pp.42-48. 5 "Zonghua renmin gongheguo renkou yu jihua shengyu fa,"promulgated 29 December 2001 and in force 1 September 2002.in Renkou yu jihua shengyu fa ji qi peitao guiding (The Population and Birth Planning Law and a Complete Set of its Rules)(Beijing.Zhongguo fazhi chubanshe,2003)at pp.1-9. 6 "Shehui fuyang zhengshou guanli banfa,"in ibid.at pp.135-37. 7 "Zhonghua renmin gongheguo shouyang fa,"revised and in force 4 November 1998.in A Complete Set of Rules on the Marriage Law,pp.23-27. 8 See Michael Palmer."Protecting the rights and interests of the elderly:developments in the family law of the People's Republic of China,1996-8."in A.Bainham (ed.).The International Survey of Family Low:1999(Dordrecht:Kluwer (for The International Society on Family Law).1999).pp.95-107,and Michael Palmer,"On China's slow boat to women's rights:revisions to the Women's Protection Law 2005,"in P.W.Chan (ed.).special issue of International Journal of Human Rights on "Equality in the Asia Pacific,"Vol.11,Nos.I and 2 (2007),pp.151-77. 9 See,for example,China Legal System Press.Hunyin jiating ban'an changyong shouce (An Everyday Handbook for Handling Cases of Marriage and Family)(Beijing:Zhongguo fazhi chubanshe,2006).and Huang Songyou (ed.-in-chief).Hunyin jiating sifa jieshi shili shijie (Marriage and Family:Explanation of Judicial Interpretations and Concrete Cases)(Beijing:Renmin fayuan chubanshe,2006)
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
Transforming Family Law 677 family life in contemporary China that their inclusion is essential.The current study therefore examines developments in this area,as well as in another and related mode of reproduction and recruitment to the family,namely adoption.It thus considers the nature and significance of the legal changes that have taken place in these four dimensions of family law since 1995.While highly important changes have occurred in all four areas,it is probably in the law of divorce that the most significant developments have occurred. The Reforms of 2001 The socio-political contexts within which the two most significant statutory developments since 1995 took place offer a strong contrast.On the one hand, much publicity proceeded and accompanied the revision in 2001 of the Marriage Law(hunyin fa婚姻法)I98O,with often heated debate among those doing the revision,and also a considerable degree of openly expressed controversy over some of the key issues.0 These included the nature of marriage,the notion of a “relative'(gingi亲戚),and various aspects of divorce including the grounds for divorce,property and custody rights,compensation for morally blameworthy conduct leading to divorce,and the appropriate responses to domestic violence. Within these discussions,it was possible to discern shifting ideas about appropriate boundaries between the public sphere and private life -in particular,the appropriateness of state intervention in family matters.On the other hand,remarkably little fanfare surrounded the promulgation of the Population and Birth Planning Law(renkou yu jihua shengyu fa人口与计划生育 later the same year.In formal,legal terms this is perhaps best explained by reference to the different legislative tracks that the two developments were apparently assigned.Although both legislative advances were promulgated by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress,the Marriage Law revisions took place within a procedural framework clearly informed by some of the reforms encouraging openness and greater public consultation introduced by the 2000 Law on Legislation.In contrast,the family planning code involved a much more restricted approach,with virtually no public deliberation.This lack of openness reflected the politically-sensitive nature of population control,and such conservatism should be borne in mind,for example,when making judgements about the significance of family law in post-Deng China for an emerging civil society. Marriage As indicated in the earlier China Ouarterly article,in the PRC marriages are concluded in law by registration,not by celebration.The legal requirement of 10 For an admirable analysis of key aspects of the reform of the Marriage Law in 2001 see William Alford and Yuanyuan Shen,"Have you eaten,have you divorced?Debating the meaning of freedom in marriage in China,"in William C.Kirby (ed.),Realms of Freedom in Modern China,Vol.15,"Making of modern freedom"series (Stanford,CA:Stanford University Press,2004)
! $ $ 2 % ())* A $ $%%& ! ())* % # $ 0--( + / & ' (),-$ $ ! % (- $ 33 &77 '$ $ $ $ A $ 9 $ # $ % / & 6 ' 2 $ ! % 7 $ + / % % 0--- / / 2 $ $ % $ $ ! $ % " $ $ = (- . % + / 0--( A 5 $ 33F $ J $ A G &'$ $ I (*$ 33+ % & $ 4 6 $ 0--8' &' ( ) *+ !""